BoxRec

Posted: **09 Jun 2018, 18:15**

Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.

Posted: **09 Jun 2018, 18:16**

BitPlayer wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:11 Looked rusty, especially early, and needs to get the flab off. But great to see him back

Yeah. Still have things to fix after such terribly long time off. Well, he warmed up a bit, probably he'll come back in a better shape in august.

Posted: **09 Jun 2018, 18:37**

Now that's over let's see Fury v Price

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 06:21**

mickey1975 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 14:58
Taansend wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 14:57
mickey1975 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 14:36 3 cousins in top ten.
Is that the new England World Cup song?
No mate, Tyson, Hughie and Nathan. You'll catch up when you get home....

Top 10 of what? None of them are in any of the sanctioning bodies top 10s at the moment.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 10:32**

I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 10:55**

confused wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.

I'm a Fury fan but he has been built up a bit much during his absence. His win over Klitschko was fantastic but it could have been a matter of styles plus Wlad thinking Tyson was a clown (in that case, brilliant kidology Fury

).

Or Fury could truly be amazing. Time will tell & I hope he stays dedicated & that W@rren delivers rather than go safety first.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 11:36**

confused wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.

Me too,just don't get the hype that he put on some masterclass boxing display against Wlad,Joshua and Wilder won't hold back because of 7 jabs a round being thrown at them.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 11:38**

Taansend wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:55
confused wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
I'm a Fury fan but he has been built up a bit much during his absence. His win over Klitschko was fantastic but it could have been a matter of styles plus Wlad thinking Tyson was a clown (in that case, brilliant kidology Fury ).

Or Fury could truly be amazing. Time will tell & I hope he stays dedicated & that W@rren delivers rather than go safety first.

Wazza is always safety first unless it's a title fight,the one time he well and truly cocked up was Prescott v Khan,even then he claimed it was the trainers call.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 11:44**

in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 12:56**

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:15 Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.

It's still convulsing from the Wilder $50m offer

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 13:07**

BigDoofus wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 12:56
Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:15 Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.
It's still convulsing from the Wilder $50m offer

It's a done deal, but Wilder has to come to the UK as he's the B side

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 13:25**

Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 13:47**

Sklar wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM

Ronal Looks quite a bit taller on that clip, Ronal is closer to the camera and maybe wearing 3 inch heeled shoes?

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 13:48**

Tyson is back and will go from strength to strength, last night just a little warm up after losing all the weight and that there

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 14:16**

martinmrts wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?

I've never understood that either. I always thought I was missing something.

Sklar wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM

Eagle eyed boxrecers may have noticed that Tyson was billed as 6'8.5" last night. He must have shrunk.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 14:58**

Big Ron is about 7 foot+ if Tyson is 6'9"

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:00**

martinmrts wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?

I know, what the fck is that about?

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:06**

ShadrachSimmo wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 15:00
martinmrts wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
I know, what the fck is that about?

Return of the Mack??

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:07**

Sklar wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM

Tyson does appear to be looking up at him at times,difficult to say for sure though.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:13**

Fun fight, went pretty much as expected. Shame he picked such a weak comeback opponent but at least Seferi is more competent than Peter McNeeley or Conor McGregor. The clowning around tickled me--reminded me of Ali's antics in his less important fights. Which I suppose means that last night there was... Shades of Ali.

Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:14**

samwbr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 14:58 Big Ron is about 7 foot+ if Tyson is 6'9"

Or the canvas doesn't sink so much under Ron's weight

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:32**

Fury against Klitschko was far from a boxing masterclass but he did win the fight and it was quite clear cut. Joshua went life and death with him albeit in a completely different manner, and some say That makes Joshua the man. Let’s see what Tyson is like in 12 months time and then these 2 can settle it. That’s if Joshua has still got them belts and wilder hasn’t gatecrasged the party

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:36**

Tuan_Jim wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 15:13 Fun fight, went pretty much as expected. Shame he picked such a weak comeback opponent but at least Seferi is more competent than Peter McNeeley or Conor McGregor. The clowning around tickled me--reminded me of Ali's antics in his less important fights. Which I suppose means that last night there was... Shades of Ali.

Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.

Bad form, that.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 15:58**

Didn't realise you were a Ron Mac fan, Mickey. In fact I didn't realise Ron had fans at all.

Posted: **10 Jun 2018, 16:58**

Taansend wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 11:36 Dear Deirdre

I am a 43 year old man from Oop North who is obsessed with a giant who lives in a tiny caravan.

It's affecting my personal life to such a degree that I can't stop thinking or talking about him.

Please help!

Michael.

Hahahaha! Cruel but hilarious, im cackling like a witch who just spoilt her neighbours milk.

BoxRec

The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back

Re: The Mack is Back