BoxRec

G.McClellan wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 03:05 Lets assume there was nothing to provoke the situation.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 19:18

candyslim wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 16:52 Yeaaah Perhaps she was a North Korean spy and Jermell went for her throat to stop her yelling secret information to her contact hiding the other side of the fence that he would have reported back to little rocket man. Jermell could be a national hero but there you go jumping to conclusions and assuming he's the bad guy.

Never thought of that did ya?

Nah, I leave that to the conspiracy theorists. CNN.

For all we know, Jermell might be taking the rap for Jermall.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 16:26

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:53

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:33

She may have attacked him with some sort of weapon.

Then it's self defense. And self defense is justifiable no matter what the gender.

Ah, you think he was the one calling police to arrest the armed female aggressor?

I don't know who called the police.

Sometimes the perp does it as a way to look like the innocent victim.

Or the woman may have started the whole incident and then called the police for protection once Charlo got the upper hand.

Honestly, i don't know. I never said that Charlo was innocent. He may be guilty as hell.

I'm just defending him until the entire story comes out. And reminding everyone that just because a woman is involved, it doesn't mean she has a free pass to do whatever she wants while the man has to suck it up.

Male or female, you gotta pay your dues.

Datsue wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 14:44

G.McClellan wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 03:05 Lets assume there was nothing to provoke the situation.

Provoke the situation... of choking a woman?

The only time such behaviour is acceptable is if someone's asked you to do it for mutually consensual kinky sexy-time reasons, which as this was outside against a fence it's obviously not the case.

Whether he did it or not, I can see someone digging for that angle, maybe even I'd let it go without saying anything. But implying that there is a situation where the alleged offence is justifiable means that you, sir, are a complete & total fuckwit.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 16:26

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:53

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:33

She may have attacked him with some sort of weapon.

Then it's self defense. And self defense is justifiable no matter what the gender.

Ah, you think he was the one calling police to arrest the armed female aggressor?

I don't know who called the police.

Sometimes the perp does it as a way to look like the innocent victim.

Or the woman may have started the whole incident and then called the police for protection once Charlo got the upper hand.

Honestly, i don't know. I never said that Charlo was innocent. He may be guilty as hell.

I'm just defending him until the entire story comes out. And reminding everyone that just because a woman is involved, it doesn't mean she has a free pass to do whatever she wants while the man has to suck it up.

Male or female, you gotta pay your dues.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑11 Aug 2018, 20:30 Too many guys have been brainwashed by our PC culture.

Even if a woman is assaulting you with weapons and murder in their eyes, men today are supposed to refrain from any sort of self defense.

God forbid we should punch them and disarm them and save our own skin.

Like we're at fault.

Again, I have no idea if Charlo is guilty or not. But to blanket argue that we must never smack a woman is imbecilic nonsense.

Good for you Gilgamesh. Some here would prefer you showed honor and let the whacko stab you psycho style.

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 02:07 Classy dude