I imagine it would be around the ring flicking out jabs.Kilburn wrote:Yeah and by jesus didn't he send shockwaves around the globe. Cory Spinks doesn't know where to run to.tea wrote:Hare beat the best Aussie,Pole,Russian,Hungarian and African
Home advantage for James Hare...
-
DIRT SUGAR
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48
Okay, I'll be brutally honest...
Hare's a quick-handed but puffed-up 10stoner with a porous defence, an average chin and who does not have the power to trouble quality fighters at welter.
In fact he reminds me of Rhyan Rhodes and I'm sorry, but I think he'll go the same way once he steps up to world level.
Barnes, while not world-class, has the ability to beat him He's technically superior, better defensively and will box Hare to death from the outside.
Hare's a quick-handed but puffed-up 10stoner with a porous defence, an average chin and who does not have the power to trouble quality fighters at welter.
In fact he reminds me of Rhyan Rhodes and I'm sorry, but I think he'll go the same way once he steps up to world level.
Barnes, while not world-class, has the ability to beat him He's technically superior, better defensively and will box Hare to death from the outside.
-
richter-scale
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 27 Feb 2004, 15:06
I take it your some comedian? porous defence and average chin???? 100plus amatures, 30plus pros and stopped once! MUPPET!DIRT SUGAR wrote:Okay, I'll be brutally honest...
Hare's a quick-handed but puffed-up 10stoner with a porous defence, an average chin and who does not have the power to trouble quality fighters at welter.
In fact he reminds me of Rhyan Rhodes and I'm sorry, but I think he'll go the same way once he steps up to world level.
Barnes, while not world-class, has the ability to beat him He's technically superior, better defensively and will box Hare to death from the outside.