Page 2 of 3

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 11:45
by oogiebe
I absolutely underestimated him. I doubted him vs Wlad and even more so, doubted him vs Wilder.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 11:55
by Tony1244
Not in my case. I always thought he was very good. Not just because he's big, but his size certainly does help. But because of his ability to fight orthodox and southpaw. He's also a good body puncher.

His Jesus-coke-back to Jesus persona is a bit irritating, not to mention some of his tweets and statements. I was following him even before his first McDermott fight. This guy is a serious HW.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 11:56
by verlichte
.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57
by oogiebe
I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
by SenorPipino
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:14
by SenorPipino
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.
Sometimes that's the wisest move.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:16
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:14
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.
Sometimes that's the wisest move.
Seriously. Some posters use 2,000 words in their posts when 20 could be used to make the same point. Can't stand 'wordsmiths' on forums. There are exceptions though.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:34
by Tony1244
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:16
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:14
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.
Sometimes that's the wisest move.
Seriously. Some posters use 2,000 words in their posts when 20 could be used to make the same point. Can't stand 'wordsmiths' on forums. There are exceptions though.
I'm way too lazy and ADD to be a wordsmith. :OhYes:

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:39
by oogiebe
Tony1244 wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:34
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:16
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:14
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.
Sometimes that's the wisest move.
Seriously. Some posters use 2,000 words in their posts when 20 could be used to make the same point. Can't stand 'wordsmiths' on forums. There are exceptions though.
I'm way too lazy and ADD to be a wordsmith. :OhYes:
That's why I read your posts! :lol:

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:48
by Tony1244
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:39
Tony1244 wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:34
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:16
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:14
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.
Sometimes that's the wisest move.
Seriously. Some posters use 2,000 words in their posts when 20 could be used to make the same point. Can't stand 'wordsmiths' on forums. There are exceptions though.
I'm way too lazy and ADD to be a wordsmith. :OhYes:
That's why I read your posts! :lol:

I read your posts too. We're both postal. :oo

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 12:52
by oogiebe
Tony1244 wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:48
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:39
Tony1244 wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:34
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:16
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:14
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:11
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 12:08
oogiebe wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 11:57 I see paragraphs like those EO/Verlichte posts and I just skip to the next one.
The next paragraph or the next post???
Lol! To the next poster.
Sometimes that's the wisest move.
Seriously. Some posters use 2,000 words in their posts when 20 could be used to make the same point. Can't stand 'wordsmiths' on forums. There are exceptions though.
I'm way too lazy and ADD to be a wordsmith. :OhYes:
That's why I read your posts! :lol:

I read your posts too. We're both postal. :oo
That was bad... :KO:

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 13:29
by SenorPipino
Okay guys, I get your point. :twisted:

I'll try to keep it shorter. Less thinking involved anyways.

Maybe everything should just be a tweet.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 13:30
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 13:29 Okay guys, I get your point. :twisted:

I'll try to keep it shorter. Less thinking involved anyways.

Maybe everything should just be a tweet.
Yours are not the issue, Senor. Keep up the good work.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 13:32
by caldo2025
I am raising my hand as one that underestimated him. I had only seen his fight with Wlad, which I still say was the worst 12 rounds for the HW Belt in history. He tapped so much and never fought so I just thought he was a typical blowhard who loves attention.

Proved me completely wrong. Now I can’t wait for his next fight.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 13:40
by godosin
I've seen people compare him to a living god, so I think some may have overestimated him.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 14:53
by Verdi
I knew he was good, but didn't realise how good untill he fought Klit. I wouldn't have thought the same Fury who struggled at British level in 09 would go on to dominate the longterm world champion.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 14:56
by oogiebe
Verdi wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 14:53 I knew he was good, but didn't realise how good untill he fought Klit. I wouldn't have thought the same Fury who struggled at British level in 09 would go on to dominate the longterm world champion.
I'm not sure the bout with Wlad showed how good TF is, or must maybe just how freakin' smart and disciplined in the ring he is. Maybe I'm splitting hairs.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 15:18
by Tony1244
SenorPipino wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 13:29 Okay guys, I get your point. :twisted:

I'll try to keep it shorter. Less thinking involved anyways.

Maybe everything should just be a tweet.
It's not you.
It's those other kids. :OhYes:

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 15:52
by lillywhite14
tigermoth87 wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 08:33
lazboy wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 05:45 I did. I didn’t think he would have the fitness and will to be on for 12 rounds against an elite athlete like Wilder.

What he did was beyond amazing. His getting up in round 12 was something I will never forget and is truly the most memorable boxing thing I have seen in recent years. Almost shed tears watching replays.

He’s proved he’s the top dog. He’s a bonafide champion.

It's one of those sporting moments that will be replaced in years to come.

If I saw it in a Rocky film I'd think it's daft and unrealistic. Out cold, sitting up like the Undertaker, Wilders dancing and then just stopping and looking shocked and then coming back and finishing the round stronger.
It made the fight. Without that, nobody is talking that enthusiastically about any rematch.
Incredible drama

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 16:25
by littlepug
I absolutely underestimated him, I just didn’t think he was good enough, he has a far better skill set and ring IQ than I had previously thought

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 17:02
by Duran1970
Verdi wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 14:53 I knew he was good, but didn't realise how good untill he fought Klit. I wouldn't have thought the same Fury who struggled at British level in 09 would go on to dominate the longterm world champion.
Dominate Wladimir? Did you watch that fight?

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 17:07
by oogiebe
Duran1970 wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 17:02
Verdi wrote: 12 Feb 2019, 14:53 I knew he was good, but didn't realise how good untill he fought Klit. I wouldn't have thought the same Fury who struggled at British level in 09 would go on to dominate the longterm world champion.
Dominate Wladimir? Did you watch that fight?
Apparently not the close one or two round differential that I saw... :o

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 12 Feb 2019, 19:44
by ewenhay
I think just about everyone will have underestimated him at some point.

Whether that be seeing his potential to be a world champion in the early part of his career

Or his ability to beat Klitschko in that fight

Or whether he had the condition to go 12 rounds with Wilder last time out.

And completely understandably too. Most of what Fury does flies in the face of common convention.

Re: Tyson Fury ... Did we underestimate him ?

Posted: 13 Feb 2019, 09:39
by RScarf1
If Klitschko was able to fight Fury in a rematch, Klitschko would have won. The fight was close with Fury rabbit punching and only had one point deducted by the ref.