BoxRec

ESPN Must have a lot of faith in Arum's ability to sell . spend all that money for what , to see Fury and Wilder , spank hand picked opponents , before they clash again , .

Aj should really now just tell them to fight each other and sit there with the one belt , in the meantime just give everyone who's a mandatory a go and stuff em . Let them 2 stagnate , and wait till someone else beats them , someone who will want a life changing money payday . , Fook em , AJ has 3 belts Wilder has one , Fury has non , put them in there place , tell them to get stuffed , fight each other or fight Whyte or Ortiz .

This is all hearsay without any written evidence. The actual offer could be half of what is speculated or tied to too many covenants.

sturm vogel wrote: ↑14 Mar 2019, 22:44 This is all hearsay without any written evidence. The actual offer could be half of what is speculated or tied to too many covenants.

I agree with you. None of us will ever know the real truth

What happens if breazrle beats wilder?

forcefraser wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 01:05 What happens if breazrle beats wilder?

Then Joshua’s people make Breazele a very rich man, then Joshua holds all the belts.

That would fvck them all up then! They’d be told best deal they will get is mandatory money and to earn the shot.

lillywhite14 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 01:48

forcefraser wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 01:05 What happens if breazrle beats wilder?

Then Joshua’s people make Breazele a very rich man, then Joshua holds all the belts.

That would fvck them all up then! They’d be told best deal they will get is mandatory money and to earn the shot.

And that would make my day , early birthday present .

Unless you see the contracts you don’t know enough to have a clue what you’re talking about to be honest. Boxing, like business, is full of liars and it’s in the favour of individuals on each side of the negotiations to imbelish details in their favour. There are people on here who seem to think they have the same information as some of these boxers/promotors accountants ffs

fizzjambo wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 02:53 Unless you see the contracts you don’t know enough to have a clue what you’re talking about to be honest. Boxing, like business, is full of liars and it’s in the favour of individuals on each side of the negotiations to imbelish details in their favour. There are people on here who seem to think they have the same information as some of these boxers/promotors accountants ffs

It's true, for example I would imagine he would need to win all 3 fights, they would have to be within a certain timeframe, maybe he would have to fight Joshua in London.

The really crazy guy not to sign for Daz was Broner

You have to question if Finkel + Al really do have Wilders best interests if they don't go with DAZN he is reportedly getting paid x4 with them vs SHOWtime

kbackup408 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:52 You have to question if Finkel + Al really do have Wilders best interests if they don't go with DAZN he is reportedly getting paid x4 with them vs SHOWtime

You would think that they get their cut too so why wouldn't they want the highest paying gig?

Coco wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:54

kbackup408 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:52 You have to question if Finkel + Al really do have Wilders best interests if they don't go with DAZN he is reportedly getting paid x4 with them vs SHOWtime

You would think that they get their cut too so why wouldn't they want the highest paying gig?

Al doesn't get a kick out of taking cuts pal - he likes control of fighters + networks

Never heard any fighter talk bad of Al - guessing because they aspire to make "mayweather money"

kbackup408 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 08:05

Coco wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:54

kbackup408 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:52 You have to question if Finkel + Al really do have Wilders best interests if they don't go with DAZN he is reportedly getting paid x4 with them vs SHOWtime

You would think that they get their cut too so why wouldn't they want the highest paying gig?

Al doesn't get a kick out of taking cuts pal - he likes control of fighters + networks

Never heard any fighter talk bad of Al - guessing because they aspire to make "mayweather money"

I’ve never heard a fighter leaving Al either even if they’re not getting fights. Think of that what you may.

black panther wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 11:53

kbackup408 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 08:05

Coco wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:54

kbackup408 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 07:52 You have to question if Finkel + Al really do have Wilders best interests if they don't go with DAZN he is reportedly getting paid x4 with them vs SHOWtime

You would think that they get their cut too so why wouldn't they want the highest paying gig?

Al doesn't get a kick out of taking cuts pal - he likes control of fighters + networks

Never heard any fighter talk bad of Al - guessing because they aspire to make "mayweather money"

I’ve never heard a fighter leaving Al either even if they’re not getting fights. Think of that what you may.

we call that prison pal but in all fariness Al pays the fighters well but think he has totally abused the Ali Act !

Wilder not going to accept DAZN deal.

he turned down the offer and is now fighting dom breazelae on showtime on may 18

jamamb wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 12:50 he turned down the offer and is now fighting dom breazelae on showtime on may 18

With a proposed fight with Wlad later in 2019. While he re-upped with Showtime, the numbers haven't yet been disclosed, but reports say it's the most lucrative for Wilder.

oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 12:56

jamamb wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 12:50 he turned down the offer and is now fighting dom breazelae on showtime on may 18

With a proposed fight with Wlad later in 2019. While he re-upped with Showtime, the numbers haven't yet been disclosed, but reports say it's the most lucrative for Wilder.

which reports say that? hard for me to think showtime would pay him more then 100m , his next fight isnt even ppv

jamamb wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 12:58

oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 12:56

jamamb wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 12:50 he turned down the offer and is now fighting dom breazelae on showtime on may 18

With a proposed fight with Wlad later in 2019. While he re-upped with Showtime, the numbers haven't yet been disclosed, but reports say it's the most lucrative for Wilder.

which reports say that? hard for me to think showtime would pay him more then 100m , his next fight isnt even ppv

https://www.mmamania.com/2019/3/19/1827 ... e-2019-mma

that just sounds like speculation

Would have lost his last fight if he was with Dazn and knows it.

Wilder's deal with Showtime:

Three fight deal:
-Breazeale
-Wlad Klitchko
-(maybe) Ortiz rematch

No dollar terms have been disclosed yet.

http://www.fightsports.tv/wilder-signs- ... this-year/

oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Mar 2019, 13:04 Wilder's deal with Showtime:

Three fight deal:
-Breazeale
-Wlad Klitchko
-(maybe) Ortiz rematch

No dollar terms have been disclosed yet.

http://www.fightsports.tv/wilder-signs- ... this-year/

awful

he turned down aj after breazeale for this, i dont want to hear again that its aj ducking somehow

All of the big three are to blame. The good news is that Wilder's three fights are all in 2019, so maybe we can get AJ/Wilder early 2020, which was the DAZN deal anyway. Wilder not a fool if the money on this deal makes sense. I'm surprised nothing has been disclosed.

My personal feelings are that this is all bvllshvt and once again we have to wait for HW title unification. All three (Fury/Wilder/Joshua) can go to hell! Can't wait for the prospects to mature and make moves.

Makes me want to pull out what's left of my hair!!!!

It’s so obvious Wilder & Fury are ducking AJ, it’s pretty pathetic. He’d make them both more money than they’ve ever seen, and they’re still doing everything they can to avoid him.

Anyone think that Vlad could take Wilders head off?