BoxRec

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑10 Apr 2017, 14:08 What a f*cking idiot. Canelo skills, especially footwork and jab are nowhere near Golovkin's. Every time he has a good boxer in front of him (Trout, Mayweather, Lara), his lack of skill shows.

Hight/reach wise, Canelo is a midget compared to Jacobs. I doubt that his jabs will be reaching the target. Getting close and going to the body is his only hope, but will Jacobs let him get close? I doubt.

Remember how Canelo was following Lara like a confused puppy. The difference is that Jacobs will be countering harder than Lara.

Mexi-Box wrote: ↑09 Apr 2017, 13:34 You really think Canelo will be able to overcome the gigantic reach and height advantage? Also, I'm laughing at you thinking Jacobs will sit in the pocket. Canelo will get jabbed to death. Canelo didn't even hurt tiny Cotto. Put whatever your smoking down, man.

GBP has been matching Canelo very well post-Lara/Trout. This is all hype. Jacobs is too much for him. Stylistically, it's a horrific fight for Canelo.

Honestly, I wouldn't put it past Monroe Jr. to dominate Canelo either. Monroe Jr. and Jacobs are just stylistic nightmares for Canelo.

oogiebe wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 13:06 He's back on the canelo round by round calling out Boxing_rocks. EO is relentless. At least you guys had him off the boards for a day or so! LMAO~

I knew he won't resist to hide under his clones and he's gonna show up.

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑10 Apr 2017, 14:08 What a f*cking idiot. Canelo skills, especially footwork and jab are nowhere near Golovkin's. Every time he has a good boxer in front of him (Trout, Mayweather, Lara), his lack of skill shows.

Hight/reach wise, Canelo is a midget compared to Jacobs. I doubt that his jabs will be reaching the target. Getting close and going to the body is his only hope, but will Jacobs let him get close? I doubt.

Remember how Canelo was following Lara like a confused puppy. The difference is that Jacobs will be countering harder than Lara.

Mexi-Box wrote: ↑09 Apr 2017, 13:34 You really think Canelo will be able to overcome the gigantic reach and height advantage? Also, I'm laughing at you thinking Jacobs will sit in the pocket. Canelo will get jabbed to death. Canelo didn't even hurt tiny Cotto. Put whatever your smoking down, man.

GBP has been matching Canelo very well post-Lara/Trout. This is all hype. Jacobs is too much for him. Stylistically, it's a horrific fight for Canelo.

Honestly, I wouldn't put it past Monroe Jr. to dominate Canelo either. Monroe Jr. and Jacobs are just stylistic nightmares for Canelo.

paddy chavez wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 05:10 Or canelo's failed drugs test and new body he's had more juice than the the man from delmonte.

I suppose that you can supply us with the drug test results that you personally performed on Canelo?

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑10 Apr 2017, 14:08 What a f*cking idiot. Canelo skills, especially footwork and jab are nowhere near Golovkin's. Every time he has a good boxer in front of him (Trout, Mayweather, Lara), his lack of skill shows.

Hight/reach wise, Canelo is a midget compared to Jacobs. I doubt that his jabs will be reaching the target. Getting close and going to the body is his only hope, but will Jacobs let him get close? I doubt.

Remember how Canelo was following Lara like a confused puppy. The difference is that Jacobs will be countering harder than Lara.

Mexi-Box wrote: ↑09 Apr 2017, 13:34 You really think Canelo will be able to overcome the gigantic reach and height advantage? Also, I'm laughing at you thinking Jacobs will sit in the pocket. Canelo will get jabbed to death. Canelo didn't even hurt tiny Cotto. Put whatever your smoking down, man.

GBP has been matching Canelo very well post-Lara/Trout. This is all hype. Jacobs is too much for him. Stylistically, it's a horrific fight for Canelo.

Honestly, I wouldn't put it past Monroe Jr. to dominate Canelo either. Monroe Jr. and Jacobs are just stylistic nightmares for Canelo.

..EO, are we having a glitch in the matrix?

greg wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 15:27 ..EO, are we having a glitch in the matrix?

I just feel that those that possess particularly harsh derogatory opinions, whilst aggressively criticising others for their thoughts they passionately disagree with, often choose to remain strangely silent when the cold harsh truths of reality ultimately prove them wrong.

I wanted to encourage those that previously articulated bizarrely abusive opinions to admit to being forced to revise their thoughts.

If I can admit to being wrong on certain occasions, then I see no reason why others can’t do the same.

The thing is though, those that hate Canelo flatly-refuse to recognise his pugilistic talents, which seems to be a preposterously obscene thing to do.

Why do you think Boxing_rocks refuses to address his own comments?

apollo creed wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 13:16 I knew he won't resist to hide under his clones and he's gonna show up.

He digged out posts of mine and another guy from 2+ years ago What a f*cking lunatic.

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 17:00 He digged out posts of mine and another guy from 2+ years ago What a f*cking lunatic.

Deeply, deeply disturbed. Can't imagine how much time the kid took to dig them up.

oogiebe wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 17:05 Deeply, deeply disturbed. Can't imagine how much time the kid took to dig them up.

20 seconds.

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 17:00 He digged out posts of mine and another guy from 2+ years ago What a f*cking lunatic.

As I thought he needs medical help. His posts sound like a broken Android type them.

oogiebe wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 17:05 Deeply, deeply disturbed. Can't imagine how much time the kid took to dig them up.

true

There is no doubt that Jacobs was by far the bigger man and it reflects well on Canelo that he was able to win against a bigger man of Jacobs' quality. It would have been even more impressive without the rehydration restrictions.

It's a shame that the controversy over the judging (Golovkin was clearly robbed first fight, and had a right to feel hard done by in the second) and the beef has prejudiced the opinion of a lot of people, myself included, against a really good fighter.

I'm warming to him but I'd like to see him fight away from Vegas. It must be a huge psychological advantage to know that you almost can't lose provided you are still standing at the end. Nothing wrong with this latest win though, let's be clear about that.

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑10 Apr 2017, 14:08 What a f*cking idiot. Canelo skills, especially footwork and jab are nowhere near Golovkin's. Every time he has a good boxer in front of him (Trout, Mayweather, Lara), his lack of skill shows.

Hight/reach wise, Canelo is a midget compared to Jacobs. I doubt that his jabs will be reaching the target. Getting close and going to the body is his only hope, but will Jacobs let him get close? I doubt.

Remember how Canelo was following Lara like a confused puppy. The difference is that Jacobs will be countering harder than Lara.

Mexi-Box wrote: ↑09 Apr 2017, 13:34 You really think Canelo will be able to overcome the gigantic reach and height advantage? Also, I'm laughing at you thinking Jacobs will sit in the pocket. Canelo will get jabbed to death. Canelo didn't even hurt tiny Cotto. Put whatever your smoking down, man.

GBP has been matching Canelo very well post-Lara/Trout. This is all hype. Jacobs is too much for him. Stylistically, it's a horrific fight for Canelo.

Honestly, I wouldn't put it past Monroe Jr. to dominate Canelo either. Monroe Jr. and Jacobs are just stylistic nightmares for Canelo.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑05 May 2019, 13:39 I suppose that you can supply us with the drug test results that you personally performed on Canelo?

He was banned for 6 months .,.....this isn't an opinion it's a fact

paddy chavez wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 15:12 He was banned for 6 months .,.....this isn't an opinion it's a fact

Big deal. An infinitesimal amount of a substance that was so trace that the Nevada Commission ruled it was consistent with accidentally eating tainted meat.

The same amount of the drug found in millions of everyday Mexicans.

Absolutely nothing there. No evidence whatsoever that Canelo was juicing at the time of his fights. None.

Canelo didn't become the Face of Boxing and handed a record sports contract because anyone with a clear mind believed for a second that he was dirty.

Trying to falsely discredit Canelo is a fruitless endeavor. No one really pays attention any longer. The story is as stale as yesterday's leftover oatmeal.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 16:47 Big deal. An infinitesimal amount of a substance that was so trace that the Nevada Commission ruled it was consistent with accidentally eating tainted meat.

The same amount of the drug found in millions of everyday Mexicans.

Absolutely nothing there. No evidence whatsoever that Canelo was juicing at the time of his fights. None.

Canelo didn't become the Face of Boxing and handed a record sports contract because anyone with a clear mind believed for a second that he was dirty.

Trying to falsely discredit Canelo is a fruitless endeavor. No one really pays attention any longer. The story is as stale as yesterday's leftover oatmeal.

Dooooooood! C'mon mate. He's been under so much scrutiny since. Is Canelo paying you by the post???

lol this guy actually said canelo moves him to tears , surely hes on the wind up

jamamb wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 16:53 lol this guy actually said canelo moves him to tears , surely hes on the wind up

Has to be. His posts are great except when it involves Alvarez.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 16:47 ......

Trying to falsely discredit Canelo is a fruitless endeavor. No one really pays attention any longer. The story is as stale as yesterday's leftover oatmeal.

..I don't think so...

jamamb wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 16:53 lol this guy actually said canelo moves him to tears , surely hes on the wind up

What does that mean? He's "on the windup?"

And for your information, I wasn't the only one shedding tears over Canelo's stylistic greatness.

A gentleman sitting near me at the Mexican sports book Saturday was actually sobbing and shaking as he watched Canelo's defensive masterpiece.

He said he hadn't seen such artistry since the days of his beloved Miguel Canto.

I agreed through my own tears and we shared a Negra Modelo in tribute to two Mexican icons.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 17:13 What does that mean? He's "on the windup?"

And for your information, I wasn't the only one shedding tears over Canelo's stylistic greatness.

A gentleman sitting near me at the Mexican sports book Saturday was actually sobbing and shaking as he watched Canelo's defensive masterpiece.

He said he hadn't seen such artistry since the days of his beloved Miguel Canto.

I agreed through my own tears and we shared a Negra Modelo in tribute to two Mexican icons.

LMFAO!!! You are a rocker!

greg wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 17:05 ..I don't think so...

I do.

Exactly what has it accomplished? He's the biggest star in the sport and the richest. Wildly successful.

Attempting to discredit Canelo Alvarez is like shooting spitwads at a battleship.

A fruitless endeavor.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 17:13
A gentleman sitting near me at the Mexican sports book Saturday was actually sobbing and shaking


I agreed through my own tears

Hahahahaha

SenorPipino wrote: ↑06 May 2019, 17:16 I do.

Exactly what has it accomplished? He's the biggest star in the sport and the richest. Wildly successful.

Attempting to discredit Canelo Alvarez is like shooting spitwads at a battleship.

A fruitless endeavor.

..within a certain area, he's soooo unwilling to leave, I wonder why?