BoxRec

HomicideHenry wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 19:53 I don't like naming names. However, my source is Brad Goodman's assistant. Go figure it out for yourself.

Word is that there's a renewed push for Fury vs Whyte. Being reported by multiple sites. So tell Brad's assistant to get better intel.

oogiebe wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 19:56 Word is that there's a renewed push for Fury vs Whyte. Being reported by multiple sites. So tell Brad's assistant to get better intel.

Considering there's 7 months left, you could "in theory" have Whyte & Miller, however, it sounds like to me a bullshit proposition because the WBC isn't going to bend to Fury's will for a diamond belt nor are they going to continue ignoring Whyte who is Wilder's most likely opponent. They'll turn a blind eye for Wilder/Joshua to happen but not Fury/Whyte.

If it's the same sources that told u pulev was next I'd question them.

HomicideHenry wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 20:00 Considering there's 7 months left, you could "in theory" have Whyte & Miller, however, it sounds like to me a bullshit proposition because the WBC isn't going to bend to Fury's will for a diamond belt nor are they going to continue ignoring Whyte who is Wilder's most likely opponent. They'll turn a blind eye for Wilder/Joshua to happen but not Fury/Whyte.

We'll see homi.

HomicideHenry wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 19:53 I don't like naming names. However, my source is Brad Goodman's assistant. Go figure it out for yourself.

You shouldn't name names. You could get someone fired.

HomicideHenry wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 20:00 Considering there's 7 months left, you could "in theory" have Whyte & Miller, however, it sounds like to me a bullshit proposition because the WBC isn't going to bend to Fury's will for a diamond belt nor are they going to continue ignoring Whyte who is Wilder's most likely opponent. They'll turn a blind eye for Wilder/Joshua to happen but not Fury/Whyte.

Wilder just satisfied his mandatory, why wouldn't the wbc allow fury to pay sanctioning fees for a bullshit belt? My suspicion is Bob wants Josh/fury.

He does. It makes more sense strategically to get Miller than it does Whyte. A certain part of the public wants the Wilder rematch, but it's Joshua Fury wants. If Miller was "the man", and Fury beats him--- as well as Schwarz the pretend top ten contender, and maybe one other person--- it'll be unavailable for Joshua not to fight Fury.

He'll fight less than that. No reason to fight Miller. He's dangerous for fury and a no win situation. He'll fight another safe one, pulev if Bob can pull it off to snag the mandatory, and then gauge wilder or Josh. Miller makes no sense whatsoever.

I actually think Whyte v Miller is the better fight. Would be fun and games with those two.

Although personally I would prefer if Miller was banned for 2 years.

ewenhay wrote: ↑25 May 2019, 00:20 I actually think Whyte v Miller is the better fight. Would be fun and games with those two.

Although personally I would prefer if Miller was banned for 2 years.

Agree , Miller should be banned a minimum of 2 years , , If he's not Whyte -Miller good fight ,, I suspect Hearn will want Whyte -Fury , it ties Fury up from pushing for an AJ fight ,

Steveh583 wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 20:01 If it's the same sources that told u pulev was next I'd question them.

Pulev got cut and then that Jenny Sushe bullshit happened. Anyways.... Now the talks are heating up about Miller being the guy.

HomicideHenry wrote: ↑23 May 2019, 18:30 My source at TopRank told me yesterday that after this Schwarz fight that they're not necessarily looking at Wilder but rather Miller. I suppose the logic is that it'll pave the way for Wilder/Joshua, and then Fury takes on the winner.

MY source hmm

so this would mean miller hasnt fought since last November - another easy option methinks for fury

HomicideHenry wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 19:53 I don't like naming names. However, my source is Brad Goodman's assistant. Go figure it out for yourself.

'God is angry. We've made a false idol of this Brad Goodman'