BoxRec

jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 08:40 I remember reading about his two fights with Mcgirt in a ring magazine write up.

A truly great fighter.

Can only imagine how many titles hed have racked up in this era.

Whitaker is the guy who wisely said in the 90s "It's not about championships anymore. It's about proving who's the best pound for pound."

Whitaker saw that the proliferation of belts made them rather meaningless and instead began concentrating on showing that he was the best in the world at any weight.

squiggy wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 07:21

Roars Like Me wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 05:22 https://gfycat.com/shockeddeliriouscap ... l-whitaker

Hitting air for DLH

Judges: "Looks like a De la Hoya round to me."

haha yes no doubt, just raising his arm at the end of the round was enough.

Roars Like Me wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 09:21

squiggy wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 07:21

Judges: "Looks like a De la Hoya round to me."

haha yes no doubt, just raising his arm at the end of the round was enough.

On the other hand, is slipping punches enough to win a round?

It's what you do in return on the offensive end that detetmines who won that round.

I would never judge who won that round based on a 15 second segment.

Oscar did a lot of good work in that fight. Whitaker was his usual brilliant defensive self, but his offense that night was primarily a jab.

I didn't mean to suggest that you could judge the round off of that clip. I agree that a defensive fighter, fun to watch or not, also has to accomplish enough offense to deserve to win a round. And I haven't watched that fight recently enough to comment specifically. My recollection is that it was a questionable win for Oscar, but not outrageously so.

one of the biggest legends of all time.
it was pure joy to watch him do what he
did.