Page 2 of 2

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 13:48
by tiny_acres
stevec@france wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 12:52 if people want to pay a lot of money for boxing then top rank is the answer .

if people want to see a lot of fights for less money then dazn is the answer duh :brick:
Top Rank is signed with ESPN plus. It's only 4.95 a month. Considerably cheaper than even DAZN

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 14:05
by cormack
but dont you have to pay extra for ppv fights on top ?

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 14:12
by ironbeard
tiny_acres wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 13:48
stevec@france wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 12:52 if people want to pay a lot of money for boxing then top rank is the answer .

if people want to see a lot of fights for less money then dazn is the answer duh :brick:
Top Rank is signed with ESPN plus. It's only 4.95 a month. Considerably cheaper than even DAZN
I have both. Approx $160 for the year. Combined with Kartina TV, it is all the combat sports that I can handle.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 14:34
by Perseus
DAZN isn't just about the boxing.
The streaming service is still new and still adding new content.

I like ChangeUp a baseball show that is on every night during the week. I'm a baseball fan but since my Tigers are unwatchable ChangeUp satisfies my baseball fix
I've also gained an interest in Bellator since I picked up DAZN. I wouldn't describe myself as a big fan but I do watch it.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 14:37
by Ruthless-RKO
Perseus wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 14:34 DAZN isn't just about the boxing.
The streaming service is still new and still adding new content.
Just like ESPN+ isn't just boxing either. Majority of ESPN+ subscribers probably subscribe to it for content other than boxing.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 14:40
by Ruthless-RKO
stevec@france wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 14:05 but dont you have to pay extra for ppv fights on top ?
ESPN have only produced one ppv, the way that went, I think they want to save that for MAJOR fights...

Most Lomachenko, Crawford fights are on the app. I recall Crawford has been on regular ESPN. Does good numbers for them.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 19:38
by Jeff_lacy_ko
Better deal than the pbc ppv's

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 15:03
by victor-romeo
I love DAZN since DAZN and ESPN+ have come into being they have gone back and forth in who I think is in the lead they are both awesome. I have ESPN+ in the lead for the moment. Some of the fights I have seen I will list some not sure what streaming app I saw them on if you know please tell me.

Kovalev vs Yard = ESPN+ = great fight

Kovalev vs Alvarez II = ESPN+= great fight

Gvozdyzk vs Stevenson = watched at work on my phone don't know what app I used great fight.

Joshua vs Ruiz =DAZN= Great fight historical fight watched on phone DAZN worth it right there.

GGG vs Rolls=DAZN = Great to watch aged GGG operate against inferior opponent .

Lomachenko vs Linares = Regular ESPN I believe

Lomachenko vs Campbell = ESPN+

Lomachenko vs Rigondeux? HBO, ESPN, ESPN+?

Lomachenko vs Predaza = ESPN Regular?

Lomachenko vs Crolla = ESPN regular or +?

Teofimo lopez vs Japanese opponent = ESPN+

Fury vs Wallin = ESPN+

Fury vs Schwarz = ESPN+

Hrgovic vs Corbin = DAZN

Hrgovic vs Heredia = DAZN

Taylor vs Barnychyk=DAZN

Raimerz vs Hooker = DAZN

Doriticos vs Tabiti=DAZN

Bredis vs Glowacki = DAZN

Australian Moloney Brothers = ESPN+

Paul Kroll vs Shinard Bunch ESPN+ Great fight.

Haney vs Abdullev = DAZN

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 15:14
by jujigatame
The really good fights are too infrequent. I haven't had a subscription since Ramirez vs. Hooker. Not sure when I'll renew.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 16:44
by Onetimeonly
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 14:37
Perseus wrote: 20 Sep 2019, 14:34 DAZN isn't just about the boxing.
The streaming service is still new and still adding new content.
Just like ESPN+ isn't just boxing either. Majority of ESPN+ subscribers probably subscribe to it for content other than boxing.
Definitely

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 16:46
by margaret thatcher
jujigatame wrote: 21 Sep 2019, 15:14 The really good fights are too infrequent. I haven't had a subscription since Ramirez vs. Hooker. Not sure when I'll renew.
What do you recommend getting for boxing

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 18:19
by ironbeard
jujigatame wrote: 21 Sep 2019, 15:14 The really good fights are too infrequent. I haven't had a subscription since Ramirez vs. Hooker. Not sure when I'll renew.
There’s a critical mass of really good fights coming up, but I also love it for the extensive undercards. Lots of good up and comers on display.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 22 Sep 2019, 00:22
by jujigatame
margaret thatcher wrote: 21 Sep 2019, 16:46
jujigatame wrote: 21 Sep 2019, 15:14 The really good fights are too infrequent. I haven't had a subscription since Ramirez vs. Hooker. Not sure when I'll renew.
What do you recommend getting for boxing
Personally I keep ESPN+ around just because it's dirt cheap and as a UFC fan it's a necessity. The boxing cards are icing on the cake.

DAZN is not a bad buy when there's a big fight on but that's only every few months.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 22 Sep 2019, 20:22
by Evander
So far so good.
A few glitches crop up no question about it but not too many complaints here.
Today's San Francisco v Pittsburgh NFL game stalled but all of the others I checked on worked well.
Content is right up my street, Boxing, Football, NFL ... I'm a happy camper.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 30 Sep 2019, 16:48
by jewboypgh
i dont have the duckets for DAZN,

We need to bring back Tuesday Night Fights on USA Network.

Re: DAZN?

Posted: 30 Sep 2019, 21:21
by Evander
This weekend was fine.
It staggered during certain games but once you backed it up it was ok.
Replays are very good.
You just find yourself having to refresh or back up the live programs some time, watched Man Utd v Arsenal with no problem the quality was good.