Re: Why No 185ish pound class?
Posted: 09 Jan 2020, 13:39
I think that what you’re asking for is unrealistic and will never happen.1okstcsb wrote: ↑09 Jan 2020, 12:43Enlightened-One wrote: ↑09 Jan 2020, 11:43
I just think that we shouldn’t demand fewer weight classes based solely on the boxing landscape from 80+ years ago, because I strongly-suspect you’re like me, in that you know very little about the sport during that era.
And that’s not a criticism, by the way, very little is actually known about the sport of boxing 80+ years ago.
None of us should be nostalgic about an era we know almost nothing about, as illustrated by your response.
When I was in Elementary school I knew who ALL the Champions were off the top of my head, now they have 4 plus Champions per weight class and they keep adding more, Franchise, Recess, Gold, Super, Regular etc. I wonder if even boxing analyst's or writers can name them ALL off the top of their head now, much less the average person, that is NOT good when people don't even know the Champions, I do know Fighters in the old days, like Armstrong had BRUTAL 15 round fights and often fought a week or 2 later, now we have Eddie Hearn saying Joshua will have to vacate, because he cant fight BOTH Usyk and Pulev in a 6 month Period, which is BS, he could probably fight them a couple of weeks apart as is proven by old time fighters who fought 15 brutal hard fought rounds and had either a rematch or another MAJOR opponent a few weeks later.