Brook: Smith not big enough star for me

[Syntax Error]

EO sometimes feels the need to post patronising replies telling folk what is obvious, presumably because none of us have ever watched any boxing matches before.

Well what do you expect?

When you post shït like this, it really does make you look as though you haven’t “watched any boxing matches before.”

Amir had a monumental TWO fights in one year last year and even though one of them was an unofficial exhibition, he might need about 17 years to recover.

Kell Brook has engaged in only one bout within the last fourteen months (against Mark DeLuca).

Over the same time period, Amir Khan has faced Terence Crawford and Billy Dib, with the former considered amongst the top three pound-for-pound elite, with the latter being a former world champion that had previously engaged in seven world title bouts.

Why are you so offended about the truth anyway? It’s not as if my words aren’t factually accurate!

What on Earth are you talking about?

You're so up your own arse that you can't even see the sh!,t.

I am fully aware of Kell Brook's inactivity: I alluded to it earlier in the thread and dug Kell out over it, but for some reason, I never got a patronising response telling me what I already know.

I was having a light hearted dig at Amir Khan about his lack of activity in recent years, something a pseudo intellectual must have realised.

No doubt you'll respond by telling me it's Saturday, or the Earth is round, or water is wet, or some other patronisingly obvious 'fact'.

[Enlightened-One]

I was having a light hearted dig at Amir Khan about his lack of activity in recent years, something a pseudo intellectual must have realised.

No doubt you'll respond by telling me it's Saturday, or the Earth is round, or water is wet, or some other patronisingly obvious 'fact'.

Amir Khan has competed in four fights over the last two years, which is the same number of bouts the likes of Terence Crawford, Danny Garcia, Kudratillo Abdukakhorov, Sergey Lipinets and Jamal James have competed in over the equivalent time period.

Over the last couple of years, Manny Pacquiao, Shawn Porter, Keith Thurman and Errol Spence Jr. have all been less active than Amir Khan, since they competed in fewer bouts than the Brit did over the same timeframe.

Therefore, there’s no valid reason to accuse Amir Khan of being inactive during recent years, unless you’re also willing to criticise nine of today’s top world-rated welterweights of committing the very same proverbial “crime”.

In terms of Kell Brook, you didn’t actually criticise his inactivity, instead you simply stated that he didn’t compete at all during 2018, but you did mock Amir Khan, hence the reason why I stated the following:

Kell Brook has engaged in only one bout since the last fourteen months (against Mark DeLuca).

Over the same time period, Amir Khan has faced Terence Crawford and Billy Dib, with the former considered amongst the top three pound-for-pound elite, with the latter being a former world champion that had previously engaged in seven world title bouts.

None of my posts in this thread contain opinions.

[Counter-puncher]

all these years on boxrec and still you haven't got a blowjob.

it would really help, EO, trust me, your world would feel different.

[Syntax Error]

all these years on boxrec and still you haven't got a blowjob.

it would really help, EO, trust me, your world would feel different.

[Counter-puncher]

except EO is there saying "why are you sucking? i believe this is called a 'blow job', which should clearly indicate to you that blowing is required at the moment, if you don't start blowing very quickly I will be forced to question you on the veracity of your claim that you were 'going to give me the best blowjob ever', it is farcical that you should make that claim and proceed to suck instead of blowing, this is clearly a breach of your marketing and currently I am considering my legal options"

hooker:

[Counter-puncher]

"I demand you blow my appendage this instant, I wish for you to engorge my penis to its full tumescent height and to ply your trade with great effect"

[Counter-puncher]

"this really isn't working, it seems that my organ is still flaccid, currently you are failing to deliver on your bold claims of sexual competence, I am only pointing out the facts here that my already-small penis is simply not aroused to any degree and is to all intents and purposes currently useless, my tiny, shrunken nubbin is devoid of any sexual competence and you, young lady, are to blame for this, once again I must return to the subject of your abject 'suck rather than blow' technique, a technique which, as I say, is entirely in contravention of your stated task as advertised and constitutes both a breach of contract and false advertising, for all of which you will find yourself in communication with my lawyers, forthwith"

[tiny_acres]

except EO is there saying "why are you sucking? i believe this is called a 'blow job', which should clearly indicate to you that blowing is required at the moment, if you don't start blowing very quickly I will be forced to question you on the veracity of your claim that you were 'going to give me the best blowjob ever', it is farcical that you should make that claim and proceed to suck instead of blowing, this is clearly a breach of your marketing and currently I am considering my legal options"

hooker:

I seriously could see this happening.
I laughed too hard reading it

[Counter-puncher]

“Furthermore young lady I have no idea why you keep asking me if I am ready to ‘bust a nut yet’, my purpose here was to attain sexual release by way of the practise known as a ‘blow job’, a category which you have already egregiously misunderstood, now you keep adverting to the busting of nuts when in actual fact I have no desire to break open walnuts or pralines with you, a task for which I have a perfectly adequate nutcracker in my kitchen draw at home, so rather than your constant references to the ‘busting of nuts’ which is, as I say, very far divorced from my core desire of attaining sexual release by way of what is called an ‘orgasm’, and if you insist on continually distracting me with talk of nuts I will be forced once again to take recourse in legal action, a course which you must admit my reliance on purely factual, real world sources would stand me in good legal stead, therefore I must ask you for the final time to use a blowing action on my tiny, flaccid sex organ in order to stimulate the responses of, first, something approximating an erection, and then forthwith onto the aforementioned orgasm”

[ewenhay]

“Furthermore young lady I have no idea why you keep asking me if I am ready to ‘bust a nut yet’, my purpose here was to attain sexual release by way of the practise known as a ‘blow job’, a category which you have already egregiously misunderstood, now you keep adverting to the busting of nuts when in actual fact I have no desire to break open walnuts or pralines with you, a task for which I have a perfectly adequate nutcracker in my kitchen draw at home, so rather than your constant references to the ‘busting of nuts’ which is, as I say, very far divorced from my core desire of attaining sexual release by way of what is called an ‘orgasm’, and if you insist on continually distracting me with talk of nuts I will be forced once again to take recourse in legal action, a course which you must admit my reliance on purely factual, real world sources would stand me in good legal stead, therefore I must ask you for the final time to use a blowing action on my tiny, flaccid sex organ in order to stimulate the responses of, first, something approximating an erection, and then forthwith onto the aforementioned orgasm”

Bravo

[lazboy]