BoxRec

jenko21 wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 14:14

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 13:15

It's a pile on! EO may not recover from this!

He deserves all he gets, I hope he has a mental breakdown and goes full ggg hater, I'm waiting for the YouTube videos that back his claims up

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 14:49 I’m loving all this attention and the fact that people have resorted to criticising me personally fills me with pride & joy, because it proves they cannot possibly challenge any of my arguments head on.

I’m assuming you guys don’t know what “ad hominem” means?

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 May 2020, 18:36 He's a 40 year old virgin.

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 12:06

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 10:20

Myself and others, such as Ruthless-RKO, have been doing this for years, why has this suddenly become so objectionable?

you're not at all comparable, because Ruthless isn't a complete pudendum constantly looking for validation of his opinion by posting a subject, then saying 'thoughts?' (as though you're actually in the slightest bit interested in what other people say or somehow open to other opinions than your own) and then vehemently and endlessly disagreeing with anyone who doesn't just say 'yeah, EO, you're amazing and I totally agree'

IE, one of the several reasons people find you objectionable is the pose you assume of looking for debate and discussion, when what you really wish for is both (a) a pulpit to lecture people from and (b) a willing, acquiescent (and preferably entirely supine) audience whom will simply nod like sheep and agree with every single thing you say

it's that fundamental disingenuousness- that artful pose, aping a desire for discussion but constantly belying your own pose, with almost every post you make- that is, as I say, among the several things that people find objectionable about you.

i could go on, if you'd like a longer list of your objectionable traits, seeing as you asked?

lazboy wrote: ↑14 May 2020, 20:51 LET'S PLEASE REFRAIN FROM ENCOURAGING EO TO SEEK RELIEF FROM A PROSTITUTE. HAVE WE LEARNT NOTHING FROM JACK THE RIPPER?

lazboy wrote: ↑14 May 2020, 20:55

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 12:06

you're not at all comparable, because Ruthless isn't a complete pudendum constantly looking for validation of his opinion by posting a subject, then saying 'thoughts?' (as though you're actually in the slightest bit interested in what other people say or somehow open to other opinions than your own) and then vehemently and endlessly disagreeing with anyone who doesn't just say 'yeah, EO, you're amazing and I totally agree'

IE, one of the several reasons people find you objectionable is the pose you assume of looking for debate and discussion, when what you really wish for is both (a) a pulpit to lecture people from and (b) a willing, acquiescent (and preferably entirely supine) audience whom will simply nod like sheep and agree with every single thing you say

it's that fundamental disingenuousness- that artful pose, aping a desire for discussion but constantly belying your own pose, with almost every post you make- that is, as I say, among the several things that people find objectionable about you.

i could go on, if you'd like a longer list of your objectionable traits, seeing as you asked?

Without cradling your balls too much....you have an impressive writing style. Well done.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑14 May 2020, 21:16 That's pure opinion, back it up with cold hard facts please

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 13:15 [It's a pile on! EO may not recover from this!

Riddick Blowe wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 13:23

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 13:15 [It's a pile on! EO may not recover from this!

Rain Man has been caught in a tsunami

Nevertheless he gamely battles on through the storm, wading through flush power shots that ping like hailstones off his massively inflated skull. We need to appoint a referee to put an end to this rinsing.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 14:49 I’m loving all this attention and the fact that people have resorted to criticising me personally fills me with pride & joy, because it proves they cannot possibly challenge any of my arguments head on.

I’m assuming you guys don’t know what “ad hominem” means?

Bandog wrote: ↑28 May 2020, 21:37 Has anyone heard why Jermall Charlo turned down $7 million to fight Andrade?

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑28 May 2020, 22:12 He said it's because Andrade is a time wasting bitch who will just pull out of the fight to face an easier opponent, like he did vs Mell