BoxRec

squiggy wrote: ↑06 Jun 2020, 20:48

Cap wrote: ↑05 Jun 2020, 13:05 Says something about Fury.... The win over Wilder was one over a guy fans had been making fun of for years and he had to fight him twice to get a win.

I mean, it took Lennox Lewis two fights to get a win over Holyfield, know what I'm saying?

....and Wilder is easily better than Holyfield. I mean, look how tall he is by comparison.....and so much heavier too.

The Klitschko win was for the universally recognised heavyweight title. So it's bigger & better I'm afraid.
Even though the Wilder fights we're obviously more exciting.

for me fury beating Klitschko was the best and how he beat him pure boxing and never even took a real dig,against 10 year world champion in germany, when even most the people in the uk didnt want him to win , that was against all odds , the wilder fights he won easy though he was robbed of the first one,

gilgamesh wrote: ↑02 Jun 2020, 19:58 Deontay Wilder, and it's not even debatable.

Klitschko was a more decorated Champion to hold a win over, but the fight was such a stinker that it sullied the accomplishment of beating him.

in that case fury beating chiora 2 was better then

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:11

gilgamesh wrote: ↑02 Jun 2020, 19:58 Deontay Wilder, and it's not even debatable.

Klitschko was a more decorated Champion to hold a win over, but the fight was such a stinker that it sullied the accomplishment of beating him.

in that case fury beating chiora 2 was better then

To me it was yes.

Klitschko is the biggest name on his record as far as having an official win over. I don't think it ranks in the Top 5 for him though as far as impressive performances.

The result he'd want people to remember. The fight, he'd rather people forget.

Lololol if you rate Chisora 2 higher than Klit

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:14

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:11

in that case fury beating chiora 2 was better then

To me it was yes.

Klitschko is the biggest name on his record as far as having an official win over. I don't think it ranks in the Top 5 for him though as far as impressive performances.

The result he'd want people to remember. The fight, he'd rather people forget.

come on gil you know styles make fights, you cant go by that,also its boxing not pub fighting

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:15 Lololol if you rate Chisora 2 higher than Klit

Better performance.

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:20

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:14

To me it was yes.

Klitschko is the biggest name on his record as far as having an official win over. I don't think it ranks in the Top 5 for him though as far as impressive performances.

The result he'd want people to remember. The fight, he'd rather people forget.

come on gil you know styles make fights, you cant go by that

Of course styles make fights.

Wlad and Fury's styles made one of the worst fights in the history of Heavyweight Boxing, and it lowered both of them.

That's why it took Fury another 3 and a half years or so before anybody really gave a sh*t to see him again.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:20

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:15 Lololol if you rate Chisora 2 higher than Klit

Better performance.

it was a great performance

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:20

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:15 Lololol if you rate Chisora 2 higher than Klit

Better performance.

His 2nd win over your 'loser to the stars' was an even worse fight than Klit was, not even considering that Klit is a miles superior opponent and more significant fight

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:21

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:20

Better performance.

it was a great performance

Chisora 2? I agree. He blanked him. Was a competitive fight the first time.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:21

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:20

come on gil you know styles make fights, you cant go by that

Of course styles make fights.

Wlad and Fury's styles made one of the worst fights in the history of Heavyweight Boxing, and it lowered both of them.

That's why it took Fury another 3 and a half years or so before anybody really gave a sh*t to see him again.

its funny my old man has your simalar boxing thought

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:22

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:21

it was a great performance

Chisora 2? I agree. He blanked him. Was a competitive fight the first time.

Lol it was like a 10-2 fight the first time, did you even watch it?

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:21

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:20

Better performance.

His 2nd win over your 'loser to the stars' was an even worse fight than Klit was, not even considering that Klit is a miles superior opponent and more significant fight

It was nothing to write home about.

The Klitschko fight was a disgrace to Boxing.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:23

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:22

Chisora 2? I agree. He blanked him. Was a competitive fight the first time.

Lol it was like a 10-2 fight the first time, did you even watch it?

The 1st fight? No I don't think I did actually, I just assumed it was competitive seeing as how they had a rematch.

A rematch don't even make sense for a lopsided win in the first place.

Lol try watching the fights, Fury beat him up

The rematch was even more boring than the Klit fight

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:25 Lol try watching the fights, Fury beat him up

The rematch was even more boring than the Klit fight

I did see Chisora vs Fury 2.

Basically Fury's last 3 fights have been his most exciting bouts ever. Those, and the Steve Cunningham fight.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:28

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:25 Lol try watching the fights, Fury beat him up

The rematch was even more boring than the Klit fight

I did see Chisora vs Fury 2.

Basically Fury's last 3 fights have been his most exciting bouts ever. Those, and the Steve Cunningham fight.

but how many of mike tysons fights
that good though?

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:30

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:28

I did see Chisora vs Fury 2.

Basically Fury's last 3 fights have been his most exciting bouts ever. Those, and the Steve Cunningham fight.

but how many of mike tysons
that good though?

I don't get what you're asking.

Fury had fun fights early in his career. McDermott 1, Pajkic, Firtha

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:31

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:30
but how many of mike tysons
that good though?

I don't get what you're asking.

boxing at the top leavel aint that excting

mostly mean heavy weight

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:32

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:31

I don't get what you're asking.

boxing at the top leavel aint that excting

I still don't get what you're trying to say or what it had to do with Mike Tyson.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:39

brilo33 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2020, 14:32

boxing at the top leavel aint that excting

I still don't get what you're trying to say or what it had to do with Mike Tyson.

well most people think mike is the best because of his finishes, but alot of his fights could be boring, fighters clinching and holding, like lewis too, so i was using mike as an example. but look back in the days of braddock fighters they had purses held back, so what i was getting at is boxing i find at the top can be boring, like i said as well my old man said simalar to you and he has been watching boxing for 70 years