Page 2 of 13

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 18:24
by world ranked
margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:21
world ranked wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:18 He personally don't rate Floyd better than Leonard but his point does make sense. Floyd never loss to lightweight at a higher weight. Fair play.
Why don't you rate Floyd better than Ray?
Better prime wins at welterweight for me. I also think Floyd only gripe is Leonard lost to blown up lightweight (fair point) and undefeated record.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 18:37
by jamesmcdonnell
Floyd doesn't have the quality of opponents to suggest that he was better than Leonard at WW.

As for the loss to Duran, Duran is one of the greatest fighters than ever lived, end of, and fought as high as MW, - the fornicator held his own with Hagler for christsakes.

There's a bunch of guys I'd have favoured or given a very good shot of beating Mayweather at WW
Leonard - Aside from defence, better than Mayweather in every department.
Armstrong - phenomenal engine - power in both hands, absolutely relentless in his prime
Hearns - Reach, boxing ability and power - this is the one guy I think may have actually given floyd a proper beating
Prime Mosley - the younger, faster version would have given Floyd far more problems.
Prime ODLH - even the past it version was doing very well - it would have been very tight, but Oscar would have had a great shot.


Floyd is an ATG, that's obvious, but that doesn't make him the greatest WW that ever lived.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 18:50
by H8Usernames
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:37 Floyd doesn't have the quality of opponents to suggest that he was better than Leonard at WW.

As for the loss to Duran, Duran is one of the greatest fighters than ever lived, end of, and fought as high as MW, - the fornicator held his own with Hagler for christsakes.

There's a bunch of guys I'd have favoured or given a very good shot of beating Mayweather at WW
Leonard - Aside from defence, better than Mayweather in every department.
Armstrong - phenomenal engine - power in both hands, absolutely relentless in his prime
Hearns - Reach, boxing ability and power - this is the one guy I think may have actually given floyd a proper beating
Prime Mosley - the younger, faster version would have given Floyd far more problems.
Prime ODLH - even the past it version was doing very well - it would have been very tight, but Oscar would have had a great shot.


Floyd is an ATG, that's obvious, but that doesn't make him the greatest WW that ever lived.
Prime Mosley would have slaughtered Mayweather. But I can't see any version of ODLH beating Floyd.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 18:52
by oogiebe
H8Usernames wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:50
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:37 Floyd doesn't have the quality of opponents to suggest that he was better than Leonard at WW.

As for the loss to Duran, Duran is one of the greatest fighters than ever lived, end of, and fought as high as MW, - the fornicator held his own with Hagler for christsakes.

There's a bunch of guys I'd have favoured or given a very good shot of beating Mayweather at WW
Leonard - Aside from defence, better than Mayweather in every department.
Armstrong - phenomenal engine - power in both hands, absolutely relentless in his prime
Hearns - Reach, boxing ability and power - this is the one guy I think may have actually given floyd a proper beating
Prime Mosley - the younger, faster version would have given Floyd far more problems.
Prime ODLH - even the past it version was doing very well - it would have been very tight, but Oscar would have had a great shot.


Floyd is an ATG, that's obvious, but that doesn't make him the greatest WW that ever lived.
Prime Mosley would have slaughtered Mayweather. But I can't see any version of ODLH beating Floyd.
I can't see anyone 'slaughtering' Mayweather. :lol:

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:06
by jamesmcdonnell
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:52
H8Usernames wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:50

Prime Mosley would have slaughtered Mayweather. But I can't see any version of ODLH beating Floyd.
I can't see anyone 'slaughtering' Mayweather. :lol:
I can see hearns slaughtering him..im not saying its a certainty, but he had the tools.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:07
by margaret thatcher
Floyd is in with a real shot of beating anyone in history up to 154

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:11
by jamesmcdonnell
I'd agree with that too.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:21
by world ranked
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:37 Floyd doesn't have the quality of opponents to suggest that he was better than Leonard at WW.

As for the loss to Duran, Duran is one of the greatest fighters than ever lived, end of, and fought as high as MW, - the fornicator held his own with Hagler for christsakes.

There's a bunch of guys I'd have favoured or given a very good shot of beating Mayweather at WW
Leonard - Aside from defence, better than Mayweather in every department.
Armstrong - phenomenal engine - power in both hands, absolutely relentless in his prime
Hearns - Reach, boxing ability and power - this is the one guy I think may have actually given floyd a proper beating
Prime Mosley - the younger, faster version would have given Floyd far more problems.
Prime ODLH - even the past it version was doing very well - it would have been very tight, but Oscar would have had a great shot.


Floyd is an ATG, that's obvious, but that doesn't make him the greatest WW that ever lived.
Agree he's ATG but not the best welterweight ever or TBE.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:24
by IKSRTFO
world ranked wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:24
margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:21

Why don't you rate Floyd better than Ray?
Better prime wins at welterweight for me. I also think Floyd only gripe is Leonard lost to blown up lightweight (fair point) and undefeated record.
That's a myth. How is that true, when:
1, Duran was at welter for two years, 8 fights BEFORE fighting Leonard.
2. He was naturally heavier than Leonard

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:26
by IKSRTFO
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:52
H8Usernames wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:50

Prime Mosley would have slaughtered Mayweather. But I can't see any version of ODLH beating Floyd.
I can't see anyone 'slaughtering' Mayweather. :lol:
Not even Tommy Hearns? Sugar Ray Robinson?

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:27
by oogiebe
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:26
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 18:52
I can't see anyone 'slaughtering' Mayweather. :lol:
Not even Tommy Hearns? Sugar Ray Robinson?
Slaughter? nah.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:28
by margaret thatcher
SMW RJ?

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:31
by IKSRTFO
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:27
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:26

Not even Tommy Hearns? Sugar Ray Robinson?
Slaughter? nah.
I think both waxes him. Hearns might catch him within 8 rounds. Not a knock on Floyd, I just stylewise, he would have to at some point attempt to fight Hearns to win when he's down on points and that's where it could end. Either that or use his defense to lose a wide decision.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
by oogiebe
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:31
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:27
Slaughter? nah.
I think both waxes him. Hearns might catch him within 8 rounds. Not a knock on Floyd, I just stylewise, he would have to at some point attempt to fight Hearns to win when he's down on points and that's where it could end. Either that or use his defense to lose a wide decision.
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:39
by margaret thatcher
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:31

I think both waxes him. Hearns might catch him within 8 rounds. Not a knock on Floyd, I just stylewise, he would have to at some point attempt to fight Hearns to win when he's down on points and that's where it could end. Either that or use his defense to lose a wide decision.
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?
Who you got in Floyd vs Tommy?

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:44
by IKSRTFO
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:31

I think both waxes him. Hearns might catch him within 8 rounds. Not a knock on Floyd, I just stylewise, he would have to at some point attempt to fight Hearns to win when he's down on points and that's where it could end. Either that or use his defense to lose a wide decision.
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?
Maybe the fact that hardly anyone has ever out boxed Hearns, especially below 154. The ones who beat him, either made a decision to fight him, or happened to catch him. I can't see Floyd doing neither. Doesn't mean he isn't amazing BOXER. Just means, he doesn't line up with what it takes to beat someone like Hearns.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 19:50
by oogiebe
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:44
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?
Maybe the fact that hardly anyone has ever out boxed Hearns, especially below 154. The ones who beat him, either made a decision to fight him, or happened to catch him. I can't see Floyd doing neither. Doesn't mean he isn't amazing BOXER. Just means, he doesn't line up with what it takes to beat someone like Hearns.
Again, I'm addressing the comment made that Hearns and SRR would "slaughter" floyd. I don't see it that way.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 20:39
by Bujia
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
IKSRTFO wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:31

I think both waxes him. Hearns might catch him within 8 rounds. Not a knock on Floyd, I just stylewise, he would have to at some point attempt to fight Hearns to win when he's down on points and that's where it could end. Either that or use his defense to lose a wide decision.
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?
Hearns was about the toughest fighter ever to outbox. That height, reach, speed, and elite jab/straight right were pretty much impossible to get the better of. The guy out-jabbed and out-boxed Virgil Hill at Lt. Heavyweight, for God's sake.

In order to beat him, you had to absorb the damage necessary (which is far easier said than done) to take him inside and turn it into a fire fight. Floyd didn't have the size, power, or combination punching Leonard possessed to make that route work for him.

Best case scenario is he loses a wide UD a la Benitez. Worst case is he goes for broke and gets KO'd.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 20:45
by oogiebe
Bujia wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 20:39
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?
Hearns was about the toughest fighter ever to outbox. That height, reach, speed, and elite jab/straight right were pretty much impossible to get the better of. The guy out-jabbed and out-boxed Virgil Hill at Lt. Heavyweight, for God's sake.

In order to beat him, you had to absorb the damage necessary (which is far easier said than done) to take him inside and turn it into a fire fight. Floyd didn't have the size, power, or combination punching Leonard possessed to make that route work for him.

Best case scenario is he loses a wide UD a la Benitez. Worst case is he goes for broke and gets KO'd.
So you say that Hearns would slaughter FMJ?

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 21:05
by IKSRTFO
Bujia wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 20:39
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 19:37
Floyd could lose to Hearns or SRR ,but he won't get "slaughtered," which is what I've been saying in response. All three are an elite level that makes it too hard to predict. to say 'stylewise' is a bit foolish. Floyd is an amazing fighter. What in his career shows you that Hearns would be able to outbox him in the first place?
Hearns was about the toughest fighter ever to outbox. That height, reach, speed, and elite jab/straight right were pretty much impossible to get the better of. The guy out-jabbed and out-boxed Virgil Hill at Lt. Heavyweight, for God's sake.

In order to beat him, you had to absorb the damage necessary (which is far easier said than done) to take him inside and turn it into a fire fight. Floyd didn't have the size, power, or combination punching Leonard possessed to make that route work for him.

Best case scenario is he loses a wide UD a la Benitez. Worst case is he goes for broke and gets KO'd.
:TU:

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 21:06
by IKSRTFO
oogiebe wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 20:45
Bujia wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 20:39
Hearns was about the toughest fighter ever to outbox. That height, reach, speed, and elite jab/straight right were pretty much impossible to get the better of. The guy out-jabbed and out-boxed Virgil Hill at Lt. Heavyweight, for God's sake.

In order to beat him, you had to absorb the damage necessary (which is far easier said than done) to take him inside and turn it into a fire fight. Floyd didn't have the size, power, or combination punching Leonard possessed to make that route work for him.

Best case scenario is he loses a wide UD a la Benitez. Worst case is he goes for broke and gets KO'd.
So you say that Hearns would slaughter FMJ?
He would. Again, not a knock on Floyd's greatness. Hearns also slaughtered Duran, who is just as great as Floyd.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 21:08
by margaret thatcher
Don't see a slaughter. If Floyd really is that totally outgunned he was still great enough defensively to see it out and lose a wide decision.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 21:17
by Bujia
margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 21:08 Don't see a slaughter. If Floyd really is that totally outgunned he was still great enough defensively to see it out and lose a wide decision.
That's pretty much how I see it. I don't think Floyd would risk getting KO'd. It would be one sided, but I think he'd last the distance.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 21:25
by IKSRTFO
margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 21:08 Don't see a slaughter. If Floyd really is that totally outgunned he was still great enough defensively to see it out and lose a wide decision.
He could. But also, pride would kick in if he feels he's getting tagged and embarrased. I also can't see any reason that Hearns couldn't catch Floyd with the same right hand that Mosley did.

Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights

Posted: 03 Jul 2020, 21:46
by oogiebe
margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Jul 2020, 21:08 Don't see a slaughter. If Floyd really is that totally outgunned he was still great enough defensively to see it out and lose a wide decision.
:TU:Finally!