Page 2 of 2
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 17 Oct 2020, 14:36
by Onetimeonly
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:51
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:07
He ain't in the top 100 greats and you know that.
Who cares? He might be, if not is #110 useless? Damn Elmer, you gotta grow up at some point and recognize fighters you don't like. He's definitely greater than Pascal Perez.
No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 17 Oct 2020, 18:23
by elmersalsa
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:51
Who cares? He might be, if not is #110 useless? Damn Elmer, you gotta grow up at some point and recognize fighters you don't like. He's definitely greater than Pascal Perez.
No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
That is the way you measure greatness. Greatness comes in degrees.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 17 Oct 2020, 18:27
by Onetimeonly
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:23
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11
No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
That is the way you measure greatness. Greatness comes in degrees.
You couldn't measure greatness with a ruler. Your methods are to change the degree and reasoning to suit your argument.
You screamed for pages about the great Perez's gold medal being a reason to counter his weak opposition.
Anyway, I'm bored with you.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 17 Oct 2020, 18:32
by gilgamesh
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:51
Who cares? He might be, if not is #110 useless? Damn Elmer, you gotta grow up at some point and recognize fighters you don't like. He's definitely greater than Pascal Perez.
No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 17 Oct 2020, 18:40
by Onetimeonly
gilgamesh wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:32
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36
elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11
No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there
He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 18 Oct 2020, 12:55
by elmersalsa
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:40
gilgamesh wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:32
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there
He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.
Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 18 Oct 2020, 14:18
by Onetimeonly
elmersalsa wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 12:55
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:40
gilgamesh wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:32
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there
He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.
Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 23 Oct 2020, 17:07
by elmersalsa
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:18
elmersalsa wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 12:55
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:40
He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.
Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.
His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 23 Oct 2020, 17:12
by Onetimeonly
elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:07
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:18
elmersalsa wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 12:55
Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.
His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.
You're a moron.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 24 Oct 2020, 08:35
by elmersalsa
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:12
elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:07
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:18
The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.
His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.
You're a moron.
Just like you, right? Assholes like you never change.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 24 Oct 2020, 09:58
by Onetimeonly
elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 08:35
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:12
elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:07
His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.
You're a moron.
Just like you, right? Assholes like you never change.
No, I'm highly intelligent. Nobody has ever mistaken you for having a brain. As for changing you're more stubborn than a 5 year old. All in all, you're a vile creature.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 24 Oct 2020, 12:32
by prewarboxing
This whole thread is pathetic.
I sometimes wonder why I bother with this forum
Miles Templeton
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 26 Oct 2020, 12:26
by elmersalsa
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 09:58
elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 08:35
Just like you, right? Assholes like you never change.
No, I'm highly intelligent. Nobody has ever mistaken you for having a brain. As for changing you're more stubborn than a 5 year old. All in all, you're a vile creature.
Highly intelligent, my ass!
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 26 Oct 2020, 12:30
by elmersalsa
prewarboxing wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 12:32
This whole thread is pathetic.
I sometimes wonder why I bother with this forum
Miles Templeton
Yeah, because of assholes like Onetimeonly that dare to disrespect people or other one's opinions.
And he calls himself highly intelligent. Intelligent my ass! He's a fool according to his folly.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Posted: 26 Oct 2020, 14:31
by Onetimeonly
Yes, all my fault.
