Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑16 Feb 2021, 05:23Since Porter-Thurman, which was 5 years ago. The figures haven't been that fight.. He's been on par or slightly lower than Crawford.
In 2019, Shawn Porter generated more PPV buys than Crawford did (i.e. 300K vs. 150K). And he also generated more non-PPV views during the same calendar year (i.e. peaks: 2.197m vs. 1.512m).
Shawn Porter received $1.2m for the Sebastian Formella fight.
And let's not forget that Kell Brook (a weight-drained opponent that hadn't defeated a universally recognised top-ten world-rated fighter for more than 6½ years & hadn't won single a bout at 147lbs for 4½ years) was rewarded with a $2m payday for his willingness to engage in last November's mismatch against Terence Crawford.
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑16 Feb 2021, 05:23Don't see why you're always using alias'..
Because it's poor grammar to persistently repeat the same terminology/names within the same sentence or a short paragraph.
And fighter's have nickname's for a reason, don't they? So why not use them?
Why don't you just admit you had this automatic knee-jerk compulsion to criticise my words, without bothering to read them properly?
You didn't realise I was referring to Shawn Porter when I mentioned viewing figures. Even though he's the topic of this thread.
And you even pretended I didn't have any facts to back up my claims, despite you quoting my post that contained a hyperlink to a separate thread listing factually-accurate viewing figures on the same landing page, based on numbers you had previously supplied the forum with.