BoxRec

DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:49

gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:45 Eh whatever. Enjoy your poorly thought out opinion.

Alpy will approve this kind of a conclusion you've made.

My conclusion is that you don't know what you're talking about, and it's a waste of my time to try educate someone on something that's obvious to absolutely everyone else on Earth that watches Boxing.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:59

DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:49

gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:45 Eh whatever. Enjoy your poorly thought out opinion.

Alpy will approve this kind of a conclusion you've made.

My conclusion is that you don't know what you're talking about, and it's a waste of my time to try educate someone on something that's obvious to absolutely everyone else on Earth that watches Boxing.

Your arguments were mostly over with phrases like "boxing fans, boxing critics know it", "no one said what you are talking about" and "that's obvious to absolutely everyone", so it doesn't seem, that your were working on them too hard.

DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 15:07

gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:59

DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:49

Alpy will approve this kind of a conclusion you've made.

My conclusion is that you don't know what you're talking about, and it's a waste of my time to try educate someone on something that's obvious to absolutely everyone else on Earth that watches Boxing.

Your arguments were mostly over with phrases like "boxing fans, boxing critics know it", "no one said what you are talking about" and "that's obvious to absolutely everyone", so it doesn't seem, that your were working on them too hard.

I gave my own thoughts on it too. I am a Boxing expert. I'm just not the only one.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 15:08

DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 15:07

gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 14:59

My conclusion is that you don't know what you're talking about, and it's a waste of my time to try educate someone on something that's obvious to absolutely everyone else on Earth that watches Boxing.

Your arguments were mostly over with phrases like "boxing fans, boxing critics know it", "no one said what you are talking about" and "that's obvious to absolutely everyone", so it doesn't seem, that your were working on them too hard.

I gave my own thoughts on it too. I am a Boxing expert. I'm just not the only one.

I've done a research via Google to prove your theory about using Gene Fullmer and John Ruiz in the same sentence. As far as I progressed, I can only make a conclusion, that I pioneered that phenomenon. Google proves it right with the first link. The next two links point at threads "Ugliest fighter to watch?" and "the 10 worst skilled boxers" on the other boxing forum, where Gene Fullmer and John Ruiz are only in the nearby posts. So far your theory remains accurate, fellow expert.

"10 worst skilled boxers"? Weird wording on that one. I'm not sure what that's even supposed to mean.