Re: Do you think Beterbiev vs Bivol fight will happen in 2022 or both fighters are gonna wait for Canelo's payday?
Posted: 31 Oct 2021, 23:50
Got it!margaret thatcher wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 23:46 bivol, canelo, bjs, kovalev, plant, wives, couches, bruhs![]()
The fight wasn't at short-notice.apollo creed wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 06:18 Kovalev was washed up, old , fought Canelo on short notice but he had a title, so Canelo capitalized on. Smart move.
You accused Kovalev of taking the Canelo bout at short-notice.apollo creed wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 06:58 lol , son, what a disingenuous troll you are:
“I was tired after round six, because I had my last fight very close to this one, but it’s okay, it’s a new experience for me, I didn’t recover from my last fight. But it’s okay. ” said Kovalev
Kovalev was in rush but money was too damn good!
"SERGEY KOVALEV manager Egis Kilmas NOT surprised CANELO didn't ask for rehydration clause!"The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 07:21 Kov was probably weakened by the weight stipulations ie rehydration clause, versus Canelo.
Sorry, the video's not playing on my phone. Can you do me a favour please buddy and quote what's said in it regarding the rehydration clause? ThanxEnlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 07:23"SERGEY KOVALEV manager Egis Kilmas NOT surprised CANELO didn't ask for rehydration clause!"The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 07:21 Kov was probably weakened by the weight stipulations ie rehydration clause, versus Canelo.
OK, I'll bite.
Don't be rude now. Can you please answer my previous question first? You very good at quoting directly from the Mayweather fingernails video the other day, so this one shouldn't be a problem, no?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:14OK, I'll bite.
What was the terms of the rehydration clause and who confirmed its existence?![]()
Let's also forget about the lack of credible sources confirming the existence of the rehydration clause... so you don't even need to perform any research and cite evidence.The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:23Don't be rude now. Can you please answer my previous question first?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:14OK, I'll bite.
What was the terms of the rehydration clause and who confirmed its existence?![]()
I can't see the video on my phone buddy, hence the request for you to please quote the words. So you haven't answered my question yet. I bet I know why!Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:29My video has already answered your question.The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:23Don't be rude now. Can you please answer my previous question first? You very good at quoting directly from the Mayweather fingernails video the other day, so this one shouldn't be a problem, no?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:14
OK, I'll bite.
What was the terms of the rehydration clause and who confirmed its existence?![]()
![]()
OK, I'll make it easier on you.
Let's also forget about the lack of credible sources confirming the existence of the rehydration clause... so you don't even need to perform any research and cite evidence.
What was Kovalev's maximum rehydration weight for the Canelo fight?
If you feel it exists, you must surely know the terms of the rehydration clause, especially if you claim Krusher was weakened because of it!
Forget about the video!The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:32I can't see the video on my phone buddy, hence the request for you to please quote the words. So you haven't answered my question yet. I bet I know why!Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:29My video has already answered your question.The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:23
Don't be rude now. Can you please answer my previous question first? You very good at quoting directly from the Mayweather fingernails video the other day, so this one shouldn't be a problem, no?![]()
OK, I'll make it easier on you.
Let's also forget about the lack of credible sources confirming the existence of the rehydration clause... so you don't even need to perform any research and cite evidence.
What was Kovalev's maximum rehydration weight for the Canelo fight?
If you feel it exists, you must surely know the terms of the rehydration clause, especially if you claim Krusher was weakened because of it!![]()
![]()
Still unable to quote? Are you only able to do direct quotes from videos that don't backfire and mess up your false claims? OK, no worries.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:36Forget about the video!The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:32I can't see the video on my phone buddy, hence the request for you to please quote the words. So you haven't answered my question yet. I bet I know why!Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:29
My video has already answered your question.
OK, I'll make it easier on you.
Let's also forget about the lack of credible sources confirming the existence of the rehydration clause... so you don't even need to perform any research and cite evidence.
What was Kovalev's maximum rehydration weight for the Canelo fight?
If you feel it exists, you must surely know the terms of the rehydration clause, especially if you claim Krusher was weakened because of it!![]()
![]()
You claimed that Canelo insisted that Kovalev sign a rehydration clause.
You also claimed that Krusher was "weakened by the weight stipulations ie rehydration clause".
What was its terms? What is a 10lbs limit? 12lbs limit? 15lbs limit?
I provided a video, which you've seen before.The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:43Still unable to quote? Are you only able to do direct quotes from videos that don't backfire and mess up your false claims? OK, no worries.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:36Forget about the video!The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:32
I can't see the video on my phone buddy, hence the request for you to please quote the words. So you haven't answered my question yet. I bet I know why!![]()
![]()
You claimed that Canelo insisted that Kovalev sign a rehydration clause.
You also claimed that Krusher was "weakened by the weight stipulations ie rehydration clause".
What was its terms? What is a 10lbs limit? 12lbs limit? 15lbs limit?
Just a guess here but I'm thinking the reason you're not quoting is because you've once again posted up that video with the misleading title and Egis Klimas being asked about the rehydration clause and he replies (direct quote) "Aeeei..it's...you know..it's it's...they..I don't know..ww..wwww.."?
If it is then, woohooooo! I win again!![]()
![]()
You've still not answered.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:53I provided a video, which you've seen before.The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:43Still unable to quote? Are you only able to do direct quotes from videos that don't backfire and mess up your false claims? OK, no worries.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:36
Forget about the video!
You claimed that Canelo insisted that Kovalev sign a rehydration clause.
You also claimed that Krusher was "weakened by the weight stipulations ie rehydration clause".
What was its terms? What is a 10lbs limit? 12lbs limit? 15lbs limit?
Just a guess here but I'm thinking the reason you're not quoting is because you've once again posted up that video with the misleading title and Egis Klimas being asked about the rehydration clause and he replies (direct quote) "Aeeei..it's...you know..it's it's...they..I don't know..ww..wwww.."?
If it is then, woohooooo! I win again!![]()
![]()
You claimed the Canelo-Kovalev bout included a rehydration clause, which weakened Krusher.
Why won't you quote its terms? Is it because you realise it either doesn't exist or that it couldn't have affected Kovalev?
It's OK for you to be wrong sometimes.
So you can't prove that there was a rehydration clause for the Canelo-Kovalev bout.
I'm not transcribing a video I've already posted, which you've already watched.
Yeah, EO should provide the quote or he is a tosser !The Gratest wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:23Don't be rude now. Can you please answer my previous question first? You very good at quoting directly from the Mayweather fingernails video the other day, so this one shouldn't be a problem, no?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 08:14OK, I'll bite.
What was the terms of the rehydration clause and who confirmed its existence?![]()
![]()