BoxRec

Maybe the potential hughie fury has?

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 11:55 Maybe the potential hughie fury has?

A year or so ago, if you said anything minutely negative about Efe Ajagba used to cause hideous outrage, even if you were discussing his painfully obvious stylistic flaws.

But I don’t think anyone’s as keen on Hughie Fury as they once were about Ajagba.

I’m sure I’ll accidentally tread on a landmine at some point, whereby someone will blow up on me for stating the obvious about something I previously considered an innocuous topic.

hughie's just a wee lad of 27, hasnt gotten his man strength yet. when he grows up he'll be next level

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 15:04 hughie's just a wee lad of 27, hasnt gotten his man strength yet. when he grows up he'll be next level

That was being said 5 years ago. Shame it never happened. He had the size and a reasonable skill set back then. Just never improved or got any more entertaining. We have had more fun on here discussing his bacne than his fights

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 07:54 The Crawford-Porter bout is basically between two inactive 34-year-old past-their-prime fighters, with neither man considered commercially big draws.

One of them hasn’t faced credible opposition for 4½ years and the other one has arguably won only one fight within the last 39 months.

This isn't 2018 - we're almost in 2022.

Your hard on for inactivity statistics are really only applicable in the case of inactivity as a result of injury. Terrance Crawford is one of the world’s greatest athletes PERIOD. Do you think he’s not working just as hard week in and week out regardless of fight dates?

Those fighters suffering from timing and cardio issues really only apply to the injured boxers unable to consistently train inside the ropes. Not guys like TC who could have been a pro athlete in 3 sports.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 15:04 hughie's just a wee lad of 27, hasnt gotten his man strength yet. when he grows up he'll be next level

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 07:54 The Crawford-Porter bout is basically between two inactive 34-year-old past-their-prime fighters, with neither man considered commercially big draws.

One of them hasn’t faced credible opposition for 4½ years and the other one has arguably won only one fight within the last 39 months.

This isn't 2018 - we're almost in 2022.

Right on point from a well known Troll.

Bandog wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 20:19

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 07:54 The Crawford-Porter bout is basically between two inactive 34-year-old past-their-prime fighters, with neither man considered commercially big draws.

One of them hasn’t faced credible opposition for 4½ years and the other one has arguably won only one fight within the last 39 months.

This isn't 2018 - we're almost in 2022.

Right on point from a well known Troll.

Pick a sentence, any sentence, and highlight any inaccuracies?

if we are going by 'arguably'', ive seen cards with porter beating spence, thurman, and brook........therefore porter is arguably undefeated his entire career, with several wins over top welters and p4p recognizable names!

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:35 if we are going by 'arguably'', ive seen cards with porter beating spence, thurman, and brook........therefore porter is arguably undefeated his entire career, with several wins over top welters and p4p recognizable names!

Here's what you said about the Porter-Ugas bout:

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Oct 2019, 14:36I mean I just thought Porter lost to Ugas one fight before Spence and looked pretty humdrum.

Here's your scorecards for the Spence Jr.-Porter bout:

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 20:05115-112 Spence

And here's what you wrote about Spence Jr. beating Porter:

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:52Of course Spence beat Porter clear too and beat Brook as well as the superior fighter...

Therefore, you 100% wholeheartedly agree with everything I previously said.

So what’s it to be, did you previously lie, or you lying right now?

im just one opinion bruh, others had porter winning each of those fights, therefore it's debatable

i know you've dedicated plenty of time to brook-porter!

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:49 im just one opinion bruh, others had porter winning each of those fights, therefore it's debatable

i know you've dedicated plenty of time to brook-porter!

So you agree with me.

You literally submitted posts word-for-word that accurately reflected my opinion, as well as the majority of those who watched both of those bouts.

Isn't it rather painful for you to attack my claims, only for them to be exposed to accurately reflect your actual opinion?

yep, porter is 'arguably' an unbeaten p4p beast and 'arguably' took dat L against Ugas and has only won 1 fight in 2.5 yearss or whatever it is

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:52 yep, porter is 'arguably' an unbeaten p4p beast and 'arguably' took dat L against Ugas and has only won 1 fight in 2.5 yearss or whatever it is

Isn't it rather painful for you to attack my claims, only for them to be exposed to accurately reflect your actual opinion?

So you agree with me!

I quoted your words.

Did you lie back then, or are you lying now?

at no point did i attack your claims bruh, just showing how they co-exist with other claims. in fact, my argument is to show both can be true, which is the opposite of trying to undermine you

if something garcia-porter is an arguable loss for showtime shawn, all his losses are arguable wins too

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:54 at no point did i attack your claims bruh, just showing how they co-exist with other claims. in fact, my argument is to show both can be true, which is the opposite of trying to undermine you

You did, but you're backtracking, because I used your own words against you.

Lesson learned for you, I guess.

I pay attention to what you say. Apparently you don't recall your own words.

Remember the sentences I actually wrote. Remember your actual posts. They both agree.

not backtracking at all my man, absolutely 0

by the same standard that some of SP's wins couldve gone against him (i.e. some ppl scored them for the opponent), so too could his losses be wins. im sorry if saying that makes you feel 'attacked' yet again

i actually wasnt disagreeing with your original point at all, so you seem kinda lost about what im suggesting my bruh

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:56 not backtracking at all my man, absolutely 0

by the same standard that some of SP's wins couldve gone against him, so too could his losses be wins. im sorry if saying that makes you feel 'attacked' yet again

You challenged my post.

But your own sentiments were 100% the same as my own.

You can't deny that.

You submitted posts that 100% reflected my claims.

If you've changed your mind, then own it, and also denounce what you previously wrote.

Make your mind up. You either agree with me or you don't, but don't pretend your previous posts don't 100% accurately reflect my own.

i didn't challenge your post at all, merely showing how another truth could co-exist with it using the same standards

in other words, some people thought sean lost fights that went his way. and so to did some ppl have him winning the fights he lost. making both positions 'arguable'

that really makes you feel 'attacked' and 'challenged'? jesus my man, what is with the persecution complex

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 22:01 i didn't challenge your post at all, merely showing how another truth could co-exist with it using the same standards

in other words, some people thought sean lost fights that went his way. and so to did some ppl have him winning the fights he lost. making both positions 'arguable'

that really makes you feel 'attacked' and 'challenged'? jesus my man, what is with the persecution complex

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 07:54 The Crawford-Porter bout is basically between two inactive 34-year-old past-their-prime fighters, with neither man considered commercially big draws.

One of them hasn’t faced credible opposition for 4½ years and the other one has arguably won only one fight within the last 39 months.

This isn't 2018 - we're almost in 2022.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Oct 2019, 14:36I mean I just thought Porter lost to Ugas one fight before Spence and looked pretty humdrum.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:52Of course Spence beat Porter clear too (115-112) and beat Brook as well as the superior fighter...

Someone forgot to take their pills today.

some people had porter losing ssome fights that went his way, therefore he arguably lost them

some people had porter winning the fights that went against him, therefore he arguably won them


same thing, if porter arguably hasnt won in 3.5 years then he's also arguably an undefeated beast, an absolute animal

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 22:03 some people had porter losing ssome fights that went his way, therefore he arguably lost them

some people had porter winning the fights that went against him, therefore he arguably won them


same thing, if porter arguably hasnt won in 3.5 years then he's also arguably an undefeated beast, an absolute animal

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:35if we are going by 'arguably'', ive seen cards with porter beating spence, thurman, and brook........therefore porter is arguably undefeated his entire career, with several wins over top welters and p4p recognizable names!

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Oct 2019, 14:36I mean I just thought Porter lost to Ugas one fight before Spence and looked pretty humdrum.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:52Of course Spence beat Porter clear too (115-112) and beat Brook as well as the superior fighter...

oogiebe wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 22:03 Someone forgot to take their pills today.

im just sorry that i've made him feel 'attacked' and 'challenged', i didnt mean to scare him like that

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 22:04

oogiebe wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 22:03 Someone forgot to take their pills today.

im just sorry that i've made him feel 'attacked' and 'challenged', i didnt mean to scare him like that

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021, 21:35if we are going by 'arguably'', ive seen cards with porter beating spence, thurman, and brook........therefore porter is arguably undefeated his entire career, with several wins over top welters and p4p recognizable names!

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑03 Oct 2019, 14:36I mean I just thought Porter lost to Ugas one fight before Spence and looked pretty humdrum.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:52Of course Spence beat Porter clear too (115-112) and beat Brook as well as the superior fighter...