Page 2 of 2

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 08:29
by CaptainSpacerod
I don’t think Jack deliberately coasted through the last few rounds I think he was running on empty after dominating the first half of the fight. That said I thought he was still competitive in the last third and definitely won the 11th.

Regardless, he shouldnt need to dominate the whole fight to be given the decision, he just needs to clearly be the better man over the whole piece which he definitely was.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 09:00
by margaret thatcher
:TU: :salut:

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 09:12
by dookus
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 08:29 I don’t think Jack deliberately coasted through the last few rounds I think he was running on empty after dominating the first half of the fight. That said I thought he was still competitive in the last third and definitely won the 11th.

Regardless, he shouldnt need to dominate the whole fight to be given the decision, he just needs to clearly be the better man over the whole piece which he definitely was.
Absolutely. I get so sick of these comments from Flat Earth et al about "championship rounds" and "have to rip the belt from the champion". Those aren't the fornicating rules.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 09:43
by Frostieballs
dookus wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 09:12
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 08:29 I don’t think Jack deliberately coasted through the last few rounds I think he was running on empty after dominating the first half of the fight. That said I thought he was still competitive in the last third and definitely won the 11th.

Regardless, he shouldnt need to dominate the whole fight to be given the decision, he just needs to clearly be the better man over the whole piece which he definitely was.
Absolutely. I get so sick of these comments from Flat Earth et al about "championship rounds" and "have to rip the belt from the champion". Those aren't the fornicating rules.
It really should be so simple shouldn’t it?

- Did Catterall get more points that Taylor?
- If yes, he wins!

It doesn’t matter when they are scored!!

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 12:02
by TheGman
forcefraser wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 07:50
TheGman wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 06:51
forcefraser wrote: 27 Feb 2022, 09:16 Jack should have closed out the show.

Knowing how crooked boxing is, why give the last 4 rounds away, including a 10-8?

Asking for trouble and that's what he got.

We all know he won the fight, but going missing for the last third has bitten him on the arse.

Poor sod must be gutted
The last 4 rounds? Taylor got a point deducted in one of them rounds so that's a 10-9 to Jack isn't it?
Why should it be 10-9 to Jack?

If Taylor won the round, which he clearly did, then it's 9-9
10 point must?

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 12:06
by Nightmare Roy
mickey1975 wrote: 27 Feb 2022, 11:24
Dioufy wrote: 27 Feb 2022, 11:16 The WBO will become vacant soon and looking at their rankings I’ll guess Jack’s next fight will be world title fight.
Their number 2 is Liam Paro.
I’d fancy Jack there.
Probably 100k max compared to a couple of million for defending the unified belts.....
exactly those fcukers have done him out of millions and they'll do it again in a few weeks and nothing will be done about it

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 12:07
by TheGman
margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 07:59 these late rounds taylor could still barely land a clean shot, it was hardly like he was putting it on cat hard, you could easily give some of these to catt too.

taylor just could not solve cat's defense, the low southpaw crouch totally befuddled him
Exactly,Taylor is the champion yet he got a boxing lesson and dropped in his own back yard,surely this counts for more than "He didn't go and tear the belts from the champion" if someone gets beat they get beat regardless of champion or challenger.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 12:46
by garethhop
TheGman wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 12:02
forcefraser wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 07:50
TheGman wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 06:51
The last 4 rounds? Taylor got a point deducted in one of them rounds so that's a 10-9 to Jack isn't it?
Why should it be 10-9 to Jack?

If Taylor won the round, which he clearly did, then it's 9-9
10 point must?
That's before deductions for fouls.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 13:31
by TheGman
garethhop wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 12:46
TheGman wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 12:02
forcefraser wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 07:50

Why should it be 10-9 to Jack?

If Taylor won the round, which he clearly did, then it's 9-9
10 point must?
That's before deductions for fouls.
:TU:

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 15:27
by richie bee

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 15:50
by mickey1975
garethhop wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 12:46
TheGman wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 12:02
forcefraser wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 07:50

Why should it be 10-9 to Jack?

If Taylor won the round, which he clearly did, then it's 9-9
10 point must?
That's before deductions for fouls.
You take that off at the end.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 16:10
by Coco
If you win the round but lose a point for a foul it's 10-10

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 16:51
by TheLeprechaun
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 08:29 I don’t think Jack deliberately coasted through the last few rounds I think he was running on empty after dominating the first half of the fight. That said I thought he was still competitive in the last third and definitely won the 11th.

Regardless, he shouldnt need to dominate the whole fight to be given the decision, he just needs to clearly be the better man over the whole piece which he definitely was.

He's coasted in all of his previous fights. It was a terrible habit that he developed there.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 16:55
by Dioufy
Coco wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 16:10 If you win the round but lose a point for a foul it's 10-10
Is the 10 point must system just an American thing? I don’t know if I’m honest. I scored the 11th 9-9 as it seems like a more natural thing to do.
My card would change from 114-111 to 115-112.
Doesn’t matter but good to actually know the regulations on this.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 17:38
by Coco
Dioufy wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 16:55
Coco wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 16:10 If you win the round but lose a point for a foul it's 10-10
Is the 10 point must system just an American thing? I don’t know if I’m honest. I scored the 11th 9-9 as it seems like a more natural thing to do.
My card would change from 114-111 to 115-112.
Doesn’t matter but good to actually know the regulations on this.
You are making me doubt myself now! But I reckon that is the British system, but I suppose that could change for different bodies for world titles.
I would be interested to know what others reckon

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 17:44
by liamlion
forcefraser wrote: 27 Feb 2022, 10:27
high tower 1 wrote: 27 Feb 2022, 09:40
forcefraser wrote: 27 Feb 2022, 09:16 Jack should have closed out the show.

Knowing how crooked boxing is, why give the last 4 rounds away, including a 10-8?

Asking for trouble and that's what he got.

We all know he won the fight, but going missing for the last third has bitten him on the arse.

Poor sod must be gutted
Stop victim blaming.

He easily won that fight and got ripped.
Dont know what victim blaming means.

Bottom line, if Catterall hadnt been holding and doing very little else in the last third he wins the fight.

Catterall threw this away.
He really didnt. He was robbed.

Catterall gave a boxing lesson to Taylor, bust him up and dropped him. it was a convincing win.

Taylor out-landed Catterall in only one round in the entire fight.

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 20:32
by blanca
Cant believe this is even up for debate. So clear that taylor got his arse handed to him and was gifted a win. Not even close ffs 🤣🤣

Re: Jack Catterall

Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 20:36
by margaret thatcher
richie bee wrote: 28 Feb 2022, 15:27
dude on the right is like dave coldwell's more generously haired brother