Re: Who is Dr. Usman Sajjad...?
Posted: 07 Oct 2022, 04:42
I've heard Felix Cash bandied about a lot too. What's the story with him in regards to rumours of doping?
Anyone heard?
Anyone heard?
ThereByTheGrace wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 04:46 It's times like this I love the forum. They do the work a competent journalist should have done already
Nothing but conjecture. He’s in the same camp as Conor, was training with him on the Isle of Wight and isn’t in the WBC too 15 where you need to sign up to VADA to be part of.
was coming here to say this. sadly the majority of boxing journalists are blind cheerleaders with their beaks open waiting to be fed. also, who would be brave enough to uncover all this stuff when boxing is so tied to the ‘criminal world’ ?ThereByTheGrace wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 04:46 It's times like this I love the forum. They do the work a competent journalist should have done already
Well, The Sun lead with a two page spread attacking Hearn in the sports pages.golden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:11was coming here to say this. sadly the majority of boxing journalists are blind cheerleaders with their beaks open waiting to be fed. also, who would be brave enough to uncover all this stuff when boxing is so tied to the ‘criminal world’ ?ThereByTheGrace wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 04:46 It's times like this I love the forum. They do the work a competent journalist should have done already
and honestly would the public be surprised by any of this? would anything change?
someone on Twitter wrote in the comments something like:
“It would be mad not to be on PEDs in boxing.”
100%, a bit like a lot of social media in general, paid promotions, biased reporting and influencers who say what they need to say for their career or what they are told to saybripez wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 07:32 A problem is that a lot of the people boxing fans read/watch are not actual trained journalists or members of the NUJ.
They are paid on views rather than a salary and they therefore need access to boxers and others in the sport - they therefore end up just writing nice positive stuff to maintain their access as they know if they report other stuff they will be frozen out
.
what i mean is really pulling the carpet upmickey1975 wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:38Well, The Sun lead with a two page spread attacking Hearn in the sports pages.golden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:11was coming here to say this. sadly the majority of boxing journalists are blind cheerleaders with their beaks open waiting to be fed. also, who would be brave enough to uncover all this stuff when boxing is so tied to the ‘criminal world’ ?ThereByTheGrace wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 04:46 It's times like this I love the forum. They do the work a competent journalist should have done already
and honestly would the public be surprised by any of this? would anything change?
someone on Twitter wrote in the comments something like:
“It would be mad not to be on PEDs in boxing.”
I don't believe that. Any serious criminal involved in boxing is there as a fan or a money launderer. Either way they aren't putting a journalist in the sights for uncovering a doping scandal that at best would shame a few fighters, managers and promoters and perhaps see a doctor struck off.
that is what i’d like to believe, and you know a hell of a lot more about this sport than I do. hopefully it is the case because it’s already hard to stick with boxing as it is.jimmystone wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 09:07I don't believe that. Any serious criminal involved in boxing is there as a fan or a money launderer. Either way they aren't putting a journalist in the sights for uncovering a doping scandal that at best would shame a few fighters, managers and promoters and perhaps see a doctor struck off.
mate if the Sun isn't your gold standard for Investigative journalism, you're surely a tough crowd....golden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 08:44what i mean is really pulling the carpet upmickey1975 wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:38Well, The Sun lead with a two page spread attacking Hearn in the sports pages.golden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:11
was coming here to say this. sadly the majority of boxing journalists are blind cheerleaders with their beaks open waiting to be fed. also, who would be brave enough to uncover all this stuff when boxing is so tied to the ‘criminal world’ ?
and honestly would the public be surprised by any of this? would anything change?
someone on Twitter wrote in the comments something like:
“It would be mad not to be on PEDs in boxing.”
The Sun article got this part right:Counter-puncher wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 09:22mate if the Sun isn't your gold standard for Investigative journalism, you're surely a tough crowd....golden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 08:44what i mean is really pulling the carpet upmickey1975 wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:38
Well, The Sun lead with a two page spread attacking Hearn in the sports pages.
nicely put, i always thought there was some thwarted literary talent waiting to come out in some Sun journosgolden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 09:31
“ This is a sport which operates like the Wild West, but where the outlaws seem genuinely stunned when the Sheriff dares to flex his muscles.”
like a fart in the bath. might be a while till the nextCounter-puncher wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 09:34nicely put, i always thought there was some thwarted literary talent waiting to come out in some Sun journosgolden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 09:31
“ This is a sport which operates like the Wild West, but where the outlaws seem genuinely stunned when the Sheriff dares to flex his muscles.”
Your youtubers and such, maybe. Not print journalists, such as Matt Christie and your Donald McCrae.golden_balls wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:11was coming here to say this. sadly the majority of boxing journalists are blind cheerleaders with their beaks open waiting to be fed. also, who would be brave enough to uncover all this stuff when boxing is so tied to the ‘criminal world’ ?ThereByTheGrace wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 04:46 It's times like this I love the forum. They do the work a competent journalist should have done already
and honestly would the public be surprised by any of this? would anything change?
someone on Twitter wrote in the comments something like:
“It would be mad not to be on PEDs in boxing.”
Like Bunce and Davies he'll probably accept the bullshit explanations that Matchroom and UKAD will put out to explain the 'adverse findings'.Counter-puncher wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 10:17 Christie was calling for 'an investigation to see how this got into (Benn')s system' as if there was a whole range of possibilities, so I'm not sure he's that much better than 'he sounds to me like he's telling the truth' Bunce and his ilk.
I wouldn't be so sure, he's a cut above those two but unfortunately and undesevedly has less reach.Monzon83 wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 10:36Like Bunce and Davies he'll probably accept the bullshit explanations that Matchroom and UKAD will put out to explain the 'adverse findings'.Counter-puncher wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 10:17 Christie was calling for 'an investigation to see how this got into (Benn')s system' as if there was a whole range of possibilities, so I'm not sure he's that much better than 'he sounds to me like he's telling the truth' Bunce and his ilk.
Doesn't matter about the dates.. Yes, it might help, but the fact will still remain.. he failed!a force wrote: ↑08 Oct 2022, 08:38 Bunce was talking bollocks on the five live podcast.
‘We need to know what dates the UKAD tests were & how close they were to the VADA test’
No we don’t. It’s irrelevant. The whole point of microdosing is that it’s out of your system quickly.
I was surprised that he spoke about Fury’s failed nandrolone test. It’s barely had a mention by anyone in boxing.