I mean for sheer dominance id go with Joe
If we go with who is the best at every division in some sort of hypothetical tournamenet i wouldnt pick him
At 168 i think rjj beats everyone in history. But he barely fought at that division. If that makes any sense
Undebatable all-time best boxers by division.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5713
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Undebatable all-time best boxers by division.
You could make the case that Andre Ward has Calzaghe beat. I personally wouldn't, but it's not an outrageous argument to make. Those 2 are neck and neck at the top of that division. Similar to Holyfield and Usyk at Cruiser.
Maybe Eder Jofre at Bantamweight? Or Roman Gonzalez at 108?
Re: Undebatable all-time best boxers by division.
You could have similar things with say Tommy Hearns at 154. He didn't have a long history in the division, but it's hard to imagine too many top guys in the divisions history beating him.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025, 14:53 I mean for sheer dominance id go with Joe
If we go with who is the best at every division in some sort of hypothetical tournamenet i wouldnt pick him
At 168 i think rjj beats everyone in history. But he barely fought at that division. If that makes any sense