Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Did the ref stop it too quick?

Yes
49
69%
No
16
23%
Unsure
6
8%
 
Total votes: 71

craig_minter
Super Middleweight
Posts: 72
Joined: 13 Dec 2012, 18:30

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by craig_minter »

Would go for a yes on this occasion.

There was a dip in the legs, and the pressure was there, but hardly any of those punches were landing. It shows the benefits of being a home fighter more than anything else, but this is what you expect from Howard Foster.

That being said, Cameron could've taken a knee and he got a decent payday anyway, and Whittaker was going to cruise to a win... so, although I think the stoppage was early, it was only going to happen at some point.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9216
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by Controversial »

Cyclops wrote: 22 Apr 2025, 03:50
golden_labrador wrote: 21 Apr 2025, 08:04 how many voted Yes because they wanted to see Whittaker lose?
The ropes held him up, so give the lad a count.
I think it's a bit of a stretch to say the ropes held him up. The ropes held Fury up in the Usyk fight, he fell backwards into them and they stopped him falling over, had they not been there he would've dropped but Cameron only touched them for a split second as the ref jumped in. But could the ref have given him longer, maybe, but I think it would've just prolonged the stoppage as Whittaker was unloading on him.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9216
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by Controversial »

deadpan wrote: 21 Apr 2025, 11:10 Compare rounds 3 and 8. Home cooked British refereeing par excellence.

You can say this for most countries to be fair, Germany and Italy were renown for looking after the home fighter
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by Ezzard »

The way Britian is if Ali had fought over here his rope-a-dope would have seen him lose by TKO about half-a-dozen times.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6530
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by JamesPhilips »

Ezzard wrote: 22 Apr 2025, 10:35 The way Britian is if Ali had fought over here his rope-a-dope would have seen him lose by TKO about half-a-dozen times.
Also Ali’s Boxrec would’ve read L-TKO4 Henry Cooper
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3170
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by deadpan »

Controversial wrote: 22 Apr 2025, 09:19
deadpan wrote: 21 Apr 2025, 11:10 Compare rounds 3 and 8. Home cooked British refereeing par excellence.

You can say this for most countries to be fair, Germany and Italy were renown for looking after the home fighter
Yes, definitely regarding Italy & Germany, the ol' "knock them out to get a draw" mantra. The UK seemed to have the moral high ground back then. I'd say since the nineties we are just as bad, if not worse.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Was it stopped too early? Whittaker vs Cameron poll

Post by Ezzard »

It is tough. I don't ant someone to siffer long lasting injuries. On the other hand all the bets fights have guys who are close to being stopped only to come back. Fighters punching themselves out ae part of the to-and-fro. Without the seesaws in momentum then the excitment is gone.

I watched thinking Cameron is hurt but okay. He's moving to avoid shots. And Whittaker might be blowing his load too early. All that nervous energy being burned too soon.

But then it was over.
Post Reply