Page 2 of 2

Posted: 16 May 2005, 13:18
by KOJOE90
I think it was a case of a young, hungry, talented fighter beating an old, undermotivated talented fighter who had one foot in retirment.

Just because the favourite loses a close fight it doesn't mean the fight was a 'fix'.

Posted: 16 May 2005, 14:00
by silkov
KOJOE90 wrote:I think it was a case of a young, hungry, talented fighter beating an old, undermotivated talented fighter who had one foot in retirment.

Just because the favourite loses a close fight it doesn't mean the fight was a 'fix'.

Its not just that he lost, its how he lost and the whole vibe surrounding the fight. I saw Kinderlan box our ABA champ just month or so ago and while he wasn't as sharp as at Athens he was about 50% better than he was against Khan on Saturday. He basically didn't look like he was trying!. iF he was motivated enough a month or so ago why was he not motivated against Khan?. And Khan was not much better than in Athens, he had much less to beat last Saturday.

Posted: 16 May 2005, 14:04
by Southpaw Stylist
According to a Cuban contact I know, they expected Kindelan to lose because he wasn't really in shape for this anyway. So it's not that big a shock. If Khan is to be found out, then it will be in the pro game won't it.

Posted: 16 May 2005, 14:33
by Southpaw Stylist
Just watched it again. And in slow motion.

In my opinion, there was no fix about it. Only thing I could see is that Kindelan wasn't really focused, Khan was amped up. And a lot of scoring favoured Khan. But other than that there was nothing untoward in my opinion.