Page 2 of 24
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 07:29
by J
they are good hey, had those on an email the other day, this was a good toss to lose to ber honest.
Lets see though i refuse to get cairried away until we are have won the series.
one session doesnt make the series. If they get 250 and bowl in similar conditions we wont have a lead.

Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 07:30
by Liam Williams
Good start today then.Australia are 97-5 at lunch.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 07:37
by nickd
England were pretty good this morning. Not sure how much batting is in this wicket though the ball has done a fair bit on the first morning.
Will be interesting to see how England get on if the Aussie batsmen are not doing the business.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 07:51
by J
agreed out top 3 at present are more brittle than Vlad K's chin
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:08
by Liam Williams
I have a confidence in the top order to do the business.Hopefully they will.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:10
by nickd
Also keen to see how Pietersen bats. There's been a lot of talk about him having to change his game for the tests but I really dont see why he cant go out there and get at the bowlers. Whas the point in having him out there dabbing the ball about we have plenty of guys who'll do that already?
Hopefully we can see a bit of excitement with Flintoff and Pietersen in together, especially if they can get the Aussies out today without them scoring too many.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:11
by J
lets not run before we can walk Gilchrist could easily score a hundred and turn it round. Katich is a solid player too warne and lee can bat a bit.
we need to keep at em boys, no good having em 100-5 if they recover to post 300 is it.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:16
by Coconut
J wrote:lets not run before we can walk Gilchrist could easily score a hundred and turn it round. Katich is a solid player too warne and lee can bat a bit.
we need to keep at em boys, no good having em 100-5 if they recover to post 300 is it.
Booooooooooooooooooo
This England side are clearly the best 11 cricketers of all time. Ask anybody who writes about cricket for the Sun tomorrow.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:22
by nickd
J wrote:lets not run before we can walk Gilchrist could easily score a hundred and turn it round. Katich is a solid player too warne and lee can bat a bit.
we need to keep at em boys, no good having em 100-5 if they recover to post 300 is it.
True, cant help being optimistic though with a start like that I dont think anyone expected it. Gilchrist has just whacked 2 fours in succession.

Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:26
by J
it was an excellent toss to lose.
The thinking being that you always bat, however its muggy and overcast and i thought hmmm, its gonna do a bit this am, wouldnt fancy batting in that. (i always think like a batsman as i open).
the ball is getitng older it wont do as much and youve got gil and katich in, expect a fight back. This is opur problem, they can turn to warne when the ball gets older, we haver errrrrrr ashley friggin giles. who is solid but unspectacular at best.
i'd play Keedy myself at least he turns it.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:28
by nickd
Even the Aussie tail average around 20 each!! So it wont be easy. Mind you they're normally coming in to bat with the team in a good position I bet they wont be half as confident if they're coming in with the score short of comfortable - fingers corssed!
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:31
by nickd
YES Gilchrist caught behind bowled Flintoff!
126-6.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:34
by J
NICE ONE THAT WICKET WAS MAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSIVE!
look at freddie's reaction says it all!
go on my son!

Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 08:46
by lvlarc
I have never followed cricket but go on Son!!
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 09:29
by DavidPayne
Harmison....Harmison....have some...
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:09
by Liam Williams
Australia have been bowled all out for 190.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:15
by nickd
England are 10 for no loss at tea. Dodgy 6 overs there lets hope they pick up the pace after tea I guess they were just trying to make it through the remainder of the session without losing a wicket as they didnt look to score much.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:21
by J
GBH AS THEY SAY.
Greivous bodily HARMISON

Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:43
by J
WHO PUT FAITH IN OUR TOP ORDER?
if so could you ask her to leave please

Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:48
by Coconut
They should never have dropped Neil Fairbrother.
I imagine there's some tasty verbals flying right now
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:53
by J
neil fairbrother? u arent being serious.....
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 10:59
by nickd
18 for 3. Vaughan bowled by McGrath.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 11:05
by nickd
They're in real trouble here, not only losing wickets but not scoring either. Before Vaughan was bowled he had several opportunities to have a go at deliveries outside off stump but he just let them go. The difference being the Aussies were hammering those balls for 4.
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 11:07
by Chambers2
I fornicating hate Glenn McGrath
England 18-3, bell end has taken all 3 wickets.
Come on BIG Kev!!!!
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 11:10
by nickd
19-4 McGrath has bowled Bell. England are fucked here.