Posted: 19 Nov 2005, 07:37
this argument will never resolve. Ali was an unbelievablre fighter, mabey as good as Louis, I just cant sit here and read shit like Ali was leagues above Louis. Joe Louis TKO 12 over Ali in their primes.
Well to pick Louis to ko Ali is an insult to Ali... the man fought the hardest punchers the heavyweight division has ever seen and was never koed Louis would never have koed Ali!.... Ali was far too fast, strong, clever and had probably the best chin and recupertive powers of any heavyweight champion. If a fight between them ended in a knockout it would be Louis who would be koed not Ali....sockdollanger wrote:this argument will never resolve. Ali was an unbelievablre fighter, mabey as good as Louis, I just cant sit here and read shit like Ali was leagues above Louis. Joe Louis TKO 12 over Ali in their primes.
A TKO is not the same thing as a KO.silkov wrote:Well to pick Louis to ko Ali is an insult to Ali... the man fought the hardest punchers the heavyweight division has ever seen and was never koed Louis would never have koed Ali!.... Ali was far too fast, strong, clever and had probably the best chin and recupertive powers of any heavyweight champion. If a fight between them ended in a knockout it would be Louis who would be koed not Ali....sockdollanger wrote:this argument will never resolve. Ali was an unbelievablre fighter, mabey as good as Louis, I just cant sit here and read shit like Ali was leagues above Louis. Joe Louis TKO 12 over Ali in their primes.
He fought some of the hardest hitters, but not the best puncher. Shavers and Foreman never but their shots together like Louis or went to the body like Louis. Their punches were telegraphed, Louis seamlessly put jabs, uppercuts, and hooks in sucession. Any fighter can be stopped, especially at heavyweight. Nobody would have picked Ali to stop the iron-chinned Liston in 1 round, but he did. Many factors go into a knockout, and to say nobody could kayo somebody is ridiculous. That's like saying nobody would beat Marciano because he never ever lost, but I bet you pick some heavyweights to beat him!silkov wrote:Well to pick Louis to ko Ali is an insult to Ali... the man fought the hardest punchers the heavyweight division has ever seen and was never koed Louis would never have koed Ali!.... Ali was far too fast, strong, clever and had probably the best chin and recupertive powers of any heavyweight champion. If a fight between them ended in a knockout it would be Louis who would be koed not Ali....
With respect Sherlock I think you're totally wrong... Louis may catch Ali a couple of times but Ali could take a punch like noone else and at his prime he wouldn't be standing still enough for Louis to get him with his combinations. Even the older Ali who took many more punches would not have been koed by Louis. Ali would have been far too fast, and too strong for Louis. People always underestimate how strong ALi was... but this was a big factor in his success. Also Ali was one of the best thinkers inside the ring while Louis never really moved from his fight plan. Against Ali louis would be out-boxed and outfought and I have to say it against a peak Ali Louis would be outclassed!.... his lack of footspeed would make him an almost stationary target for Ali...Sherlock wrote:He fought some of the hardest hitters, but not the best puncher. Shavers and Foreman never but their shots together like Louis or went to the body like Louis. Their punches were telegraphed, Louis seamlessly put jabs, uppercuts, and hooks in sucession. Any fighter can be stopped, especially at heavyweight. Nobody would have picked Ali to stop the iron-chinned Liston in 1 round, but he did. Many factors go into a knockout, and to say nobody could kayo somebody is ridiculous. That's like saying nobody would beat Marciano because he never ever lost, but I bet you pick some heavyweights to beat him!silkov wrote:Well to pick Louis to ko Ali is an insult to Ali... the man fought the hardest punchers the heavyweight division has ever seen and was never koed Louis would never have koed Ali!.... Ali was far too fast, strong, clever and had probably the best chin and recupertive powers of any heavyweight champion. If a fight between them ended in a knockout it would be Louis who would be koed not Ali....
IMO, Louis versus a 67 Ali ends in a 7th round KO. A very even fight, but Louis feints with a left, times Ali's pulling back and nails him with a right cross and left uppercut for the count. Louis versus a 71 Ali lasts longer, a competitive bout until Louis takes control late and stops Ali by TKO in 12.
Louis did not have the speed to corner to get close enough to prime Ali to land effective combinations. Louis also did not have the chin to take the hard continous counter shots the early 70's Ali would land. Either version of Ali too much for the Brown Bomber.Louis seamlessly put jabs, uppercuts, and hooks in sucession.
Ali was just as dominant in the 60s and throughout most of the 70s as Louis. Louis was koed in his prime!. Also Ali's opposition was far better than Louis. Guys like Norton, Shavers, Lyle, Foreman, Bonavena, Quarry etc would have given Louis a lot of trouble too... do you think Louis who was floored by Galento, Baer, Braddock etc would have stood up to the punches of Frazier, Foreman, Liston, and Shavers?... I think not!.Cojimar 1945 wrote:Ali was highly durable but it is clear that he was far less dominant over his contemporaries than Joe Louis was. This is not up for debate. Guys like Frazier and Norton were not annihilated in rematches whereas with Louis everyone he rematched in his prime was brutally ko'd.
they are both fighters no doubt but a 67-68 ali KO's louis in the mid rounds. I cant see louis winning. Louis against a post-layoff Ali then u see one winning by UD. probly ali imosockdollanger wrote:this argument will never resolve. Ali was an unbelievablre fighter, mabey as good as Louis, I just cant sit here and read shit like Ali was leagues above Louis. Joe Louis TKO 12 over Ali in their primes.
Nobody would ko Ali! noone... especially not so slow Joe. I love Louis a lot but Ali was a different class and I'm not afraid to say it.BoxBuzz wrote:I can see where Sherlock is coming from and I agree that Louis could knock him out, but after the lesson of Hnr'ys Hammer I think Ali found out what he could handle and what he could not handle and his reflexes became his best friend. He could keep the dynamics within that critical range from that point on and he was fast enough to get that job done....and indeed he did for his entire carreer. Had he not had that fight when he did I do not think he would have become the fighter he became.
Yes, but Ali also had probably the best chin of any heavyweight champion.... thats why I can't see him being koed by anyone. The shots he took from Norton after his jaw was broken would have stopped 99% of fighters... Ali had a mixture of a great chin, heart, and recupertive powers that made him one of the most durable fighters ever, but he seldom gets praise for this...BoxBuzz wrote:Silkov I think you can see that we agree, I think the lesson of Hnry's Hammer is just one of the reason's why we agree. He was a learning and a fighting machine, Frazier couldnt do it, Foreman couldnt do it Norton couldnt do it even though he broke his jaw early on. Not because it couldn't be done but because Ali knew how to keep it from happening.
Oliver McCall(WBC) and Larry Holmes.silkov wrote:Yes, but Ali also had probably the best chin of any heavyweight champion...
That doesnt mean you cant make opion objectively who fought better competition. If you switch them up, I see Ali having a vastly easier time against Louis's competition than Louis would have had against his.The arguement about what competition they faced is highly subjective. Both faced the best fighters available in their era.
I dont think Louis would or could use that tatic to fight Ali. The strategy worked so well for Norton because it benefited his particular style of fighting.I believe Louis would win a UD from Ali over 15 rounds and it would be by virtue of his jab. Follow me on this. Eddie Futch had a knack for sorting out Ali's weaknesses and teaching fighters to capitalize on them. H e noticed that when Ali jabbed his right hand did not stay at home to block or parry the other man's return jab. That is why he told Norton to (A)jab when Ali jabbed and (B) to keep his right hand at home to deal with Ali's jab.
Now, Louis was known for having a tremendous jab and if you watch tape of him he religiously kept the right hand where it should be. When Ali jabbed Louis would catch it in his right glove or parry it; simultaneously he would land his jab which was noted for its forcefulness, because Ali did not keep his right in place. With his pattern disrupted whart would Ali turn to next?