Page 2 of 2
Re: Ezzard Charles vs. Michael Spinks at 175
Posted: 25 Aug 2013, 15:36
by Rover
BoxBuzz wrote:lol yep that's what I meant.....however I think that particular fighter was better than Charles as well, but I'm afraid I have no solid proof since said fighter went 0 for 3 against Charles. I think Pep was better than Saddler as well, but the numbers don't back me up.
But we are talking about the 3 best LHW's ever here. Though one has gone thus far un named.
I'll name him: Archie Moore.
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
As for Pep/Sadler, there was that plane crash issue that gives a good counter to the numbers.
Re: Ezzard Charles vs. Michael Spinks at 175
Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 13:45
by Ambling Alp II
I think if you throw out the head to head between Moore and Charles, Moore was slightly better at lightheavy. However, with Charles going 3-0 vs Moore, I think Charles was slightly better, though arguable either way. Those two, Spinks, Tunney, maybe Langford if you count him as lightheavy, are the best and are very close.
Spinks-Charles would have been close and interesting.
Re: Ezzard Charles vs. Michael Spinks at 175
Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 15:27
by Giancarlo
Absolutely
Re: Ezzard Charles vs. Michael Spinks at 175
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 18:33
by elmersalsa
I'll pick the great Ezzard Charles on this one.