BoxRec

Kevin wrote:

boxingchat wrote:Maybe so, but it get's you lot talking and my topic always make 2 pages!!!

The trouble is the majority of the people on here DON'T know their stuff, they just think they do.

Agree with the last comment but a lot of the time we just don't get to here the real facts as is the way with a lot of businesses.

One of the things I wanted to do was get a better insight of how the board works and some of the rules and regulations, but even the board seem to want to play their cards close to their chests.

It would be great to do a series of features like a week in life of a promoter/manager/matchmaker or even press officer!

Kev
http://www.britishboxing.net

So why don't you contact them and ask. Would be interesting for all of us.

boxingchat wrote:Back to tne original subject, why did my topic get deleted? Do Waterman and Hobson have an unhealthy influence on Box Rec?

If not, put it back up in the interests of democracy.

Other Promoters and people get sluaghtered on here, without censor, so why are Steptoe and Son exempt?

And............................................?

See, two pages again..................

boxingchat wrote:See, two pages again..................

shit stirrer

boxingchat wrote:

Kevin wrote:

boxingchat wrote:Maybe so, but it get's you lot talking and my topic always make 2 pages!!!

The trouble is the majority of the people on here DON'T know their stuff, they just think they do.

Agree with the last comment but a lot of the time we just don't get to here the real facts as is the way with a lot of businesses.

One of the things I wanted to do was get a better insight of how the board works and some of the rules and regulations, but even the board seem to want to play their cards close to their chests.

It would be great to do a series of features like a week in life of a promoter/manager/matchmaker or even press officer!

Kev
http://www.britishboxing.net

So why don't you contact them and ask. Would be interesting fo
r all of us.

I e-mailed a few earlier in the year and no one seemed interested in doing it. I'll have another go in the new year

knockout wrote:

boxingchat wrote:See, two pages again..................

shit stirrer

I know, but what can you do?

Kevin wrote:

boxingchat wrote:

Kevin wrote: Agree with the last comment but a lot of the time we just don't get to here the real facts as is the way with a lot of businesses.

One of the things I wanted to do was get a better insight of how the board works and some of the rules and regulations, but even the board seem to want to play their cards close to their chests.

It would be great to do a series of features like a week in life of a promoter/manager/matchmaker or even press officer!

Kev
http://www.britishboxing.net

So why don't you contact them and ask. Would be interesting fo
r all of us.

I e-mailed a few earlier in the year and no one seemed interested in doing it. I'll have another go in the new year

Who declined you...miserable bastards?

No-one declined, no one bothered to reply!

Kevin wrote:No-one declined, no one bothered to reply!

With 5 or 6 promoters going for Froch Vs Magee they won't want to encourage anyone else to take it up

My T Sharp wrote:

Kevin wrote:No-one declined, no one bothered to reply!

With 5 or 6 promoters going for Froch Vs Magee they won't want to encourage anyone else to take it up

Or show people how many screw-ups they make in one day, aye Robert W?

Well it wasn't me either. I take it is very similar to the latest post you created.

so let me get this straight on the one hand you can come on here and bash FA to the ends of the earth but posters on here arent even allowed to post frank warrens name without allegedly appearing in front of it.... who are the commies?

Wales wrote:so let me get this straight on the one hand you can come on here and bash FA to the ends of the earth but posters on here arent even allowed to post frank warrens name without allegedly appearing in front of it.... who are the commies?

This allegedly thing is done by BoxRec I think. FA (That's fornicate All not Fight Academy) to do with me.

boxingchat wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Ahem.....presumably Steven Heath would agree with that...?

Who's he?

To answer your question.

http://www.boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16861

boxingchat wrote:

Wales wrote:so let me get this straight on the one hand you can come on here and bash FA to the ends of the earth but posters on here arent even allowed to post frank warrens name without allegedly appearing in front of it.... who are the commies?

This allegedly thing is done by BoxRec I think. FA (That's fornicate All not Fight Academy) to do with me.

(ref: commie quote earlier)
never said it was anything to do with you, it was SN lawyers who demanded people on here stop bashing allegedly all the time, but then you said boxrec were commies for removing a post in which you bash another promotional outfit, incidentally one that is just starting out and trying to find its feet in the boxing world. Or should we only have the one outfit, or would that be back to being a "commie" again.

I have no ties with FA by the way, just annoying when everyone disses promotionsal outfits (not just FA) who are trying to put on competative matches. I think its good that Warrens finally got some competition. The monopoly has been broken.

boxingchat wrote:Why did my post stating 100% the truth regarding yesterday's purse offer get deleted.

Isn't free Speech is the essence of democracy?

Because everyone knows you are full of shit and you only use this site in your capacity as FW arse wiper.

fornicate off.

boxingchat wrote:See, two pages again..................

Congratulations! With only 16 of your own posts!

You da man!

boxingchat wrote: Makes a mockery of free speech.

There are 2 announcements are the top of the British Forum page.
Read the second one to find out who is making a mockery of free speech around here.

boxingchat wrote:

My T Sharp wrote:

Kevin wrote:No-one declined, no one bothered to reply!

With 5 or 6 promoters going for Froch Vs Magee they won't want to encourage anyone else to take it up

Or show people how many screw-ups they make in one day, aye Robert W?

I think your boss made the biggest cock up by trying to secure Hatton on what can only be described as the most crude attempt at drafting a contract in the history of business.

Very slack.. Very slack indeed.

KO Atrist wrote:

boxingchat wrote:

My T Sharp wrote: With 5 or 6 promoters going for Froch Vs Magee they won't want to encourage anyone else to take it up

Or show people how many screw-ups they make in one day, aye Robert W?

I think your boss made the biggest cock up by trying to secure Hatton on what can only be described as the most crude attempt at drafting a contract in the history of business.

Very slack.. Very slack indeed.

I assume by your opinion and knowledge that you are a fully qualified High Court Judge who has seen all the evidence and witness statements beofre making your opion known on here?

If you are a HC Judge, shouldn't you be tied up in a Brothel having your butt smacked by a fat wrinkly at this time of day instead of being on here?

Bad Boy now off to bed with a bruised bottie!

And, contrary to popular opion, FW is not my boss and I know as much about the real facts of this case as you do = Sweet fornicate All.

Twat!

So who exactly are you then. You seem to be amazingly well informed about all matters Sports Network for someone not employed by them?

Perhaps you are scared to admit to being a SN employee, in case your comments bring a lawsuit down on your paymasters head?

So who pays your wages?

Perpetual Solutions, I sell IT Training, you can look them up on the internet perpetual-solutions.com. I'm a sales executive....

I am not affiliated with any promoter/fighter/manager in any shape form or fashion. I write for maxboxing as a sideline, nothing more. I've had some stuff published in boxing news, and briefly worked on a fledgling magazine along with Mr McNeilly called uppercut, which incidentally featured Danny Williams on it's cover...at our request...

So, that's me answering....what about you?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Perpetual Solutions, I sell IT Training, you can look them up on the internet perpetual-solutions.com. I'm a sales executive....

I am not affiliated with any promoter/fighter/manager in any shape form or fashion. I write for maxboxing as a sideline, nothing more. I've had some stuff published in boxing news, and briefly worked on a fledgling magazine along with Mr McNeilly called uppercut, which incidentally featured Danny Williams on it's cover...at our request...

So, that's me answering....what about you?

Self-Employed, I pay my wages!

boxingchat wrote:

KO Atrist wrote:

boxingchat wrote:
Or show people how many screw-ups they make in one day, aye Robert W?

I think your boss made the biggest cock up by trying to secure Hatton on what can only be described as the most crude attempt at drafting a contract in the history of business.

Very slack.. Very slack indeed.

I assume by your opinion and knowledge that you are a fully qualified High Court Judge who has seen all the evidence and witness statements beofre making your opion known on here?

If you are a HC Judge, shouldn't you be tied up in a Brothel having your butt smacked by a fat wrinkly at this time of day instead of being on here?

Bad Boy now off to bed with a bruised bottie!

And, contrary to popular opion, FW is not my boss and I know as much about the real facts of this case as you do = Sweet fornicate All.

Twat!

I have seen the witness statements and trial bundle, I have also seen some very interesting documents relating to your boss.