Page 2 of 2
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 08:27
by jamesmcdonnell
I reckon it could be genuine, there were some rather scathing words from Peter Harrison and Scott too with regard to Maloney and Warren's calls for him to move up in weight.
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 08:34
by Max Molyneux
Isn't Harrison moving up after this one and said this would be his last at feather?
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 08:38
by jamesmcdonnell
The last I heard, Harrison said he would move up when he was good and ready, I don't recall him saying he had any plans to move up at all.
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 08:40
by Max Molyneux
Accordng to this he wanted to fight Guzman first then move up.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/boxing/4420550.stm
I think Super Feather is too much though as it's only another 4 pounds. At least Lightweight or Light Welter weight would be the best move up.
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 08:47
by jamesmcdonnell
At lightweight Harrison would be facing some much heavier punchers though, the likes of Castillo and Corralles for instance, who hit much harder than anyone Harrison has ever faced. Harrison was almost out on his feet against Polo, and Polo isn't a banger.
Of course, part of the reason he may have been out on his feet is that he killed himself to make weight, hard to say really.
Look at how easily Morales was handed at lightweight, for all his brilliance at the lower weights.
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 09:08
by Max Molyneux
Scott would be big at lightweight though and wouldn't look so drained. At Super feather it's only a 4 pound difference so he'd be still drained at that weight.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 06:02
by MightyWarrior
This must be about SN putting on Williams/Skelton in London on same date - 25th Feb - both scheduled for ITV.
Not treating their world champion with very much respect are they....
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 07:00
by stujones
Harrison will have his arse handed to him against proven commodities like Corrales and Castillo. It would be a mismatch.
I think Guzman is going to win, but the only reason I am not categorically stating its a mismatch is because Guzman isn't a proven commodity.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 07:15
by jamesmcdonnell
Without weight and strength advantage Harrison would be like a sitting duck against Castillo and I think Corralles, though a bit chinny would bang too hard and too often for Harrison to hang with him.
Looking at Guzman's record, he looks a class act, but at featherweight he isn't proven yet, and I do wonder how strong he is. He can obviously box and has a history as a puncher, though not as much recently..
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 07:21
by TerribleTerry
Max Molyneux wrote:At Super feather it's only a 4 pound difference so he'd be still drained at that weight.
Fighters often say its those last 2 or 3 pounds that are the hard ones to shift.
Super Feather may just be the aswer - as someone else said Lightweight contains some serious power punchers.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 07:33
by jamesmcdonnell
Precisely, 4 lbs is a lot when you have to absolutely kill yourself to shift them. If you weigh around 126 then 4 lbs is nearly 5% of your bodyweight.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 08:07
by Smit
MightyWarrior wrote:This must be about SN putting on Williams/Skelton in London on same date - 25th Feb - both scheduled for ITV.
Not treating their world champion with very much respect are they....
Harrison fight has been moved back to March

Posted: 05 Jan 2006, 06:50
by MightyWarrior
I was wondering if this fight had just faded away, but boxrec have is listed as 25th March, Glasgow. Anyone confirm it's a goer?
Someone said this was just about the best fight you could make at feather, and I think they're right.
Posted: 05 Jan 2006, 12:17
by jamesmcdonnell
Doug Fisher at maxboxing said it...
What's happened to In-Jin Chi?
Posted: 05 Jan 2006, 17:35
by stujones
Fighting the end of the month, James.
Fighting this fellow.
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=015336