Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 12:52
Didn't Riddick Bowe get away with several low blows against Pierre Coetzer ?
CollinsCollins2000 wrote:Was that an intentional butt by Benn or just a clash of heads? What round was it in?Seamus wrote:OK fight fans, what were the most blatant-illegal-vicious fouls in boxing history, in which the perpetrator got away with his dirty deeds without being disqualified ?
Some off the top of my head from fairly recent memory.
1. Vasili Jirov rabbit punching Joe Mesi
2. Nigel Benn rabbit punching and headbutting Gerald McClellan.
3. Nigel Benn for landing two shots to the head after Iran Barkley was down the first and second times.
4. Roberto Duran thumbing Davey Moore in the eye.
5. Donald Curry (usually a clean fighter) thumbing James "Hard Rock" Green in the eye.
Remember, only fights where the guy got away with it.
Benn doesn't seem to get much credit for beating McClellan who many, even now, consider some sort of great. Personally, apart from crushing a couple of well past their prime good fighters, I never saw what the fuss was about Gerald. He was a decent fighter but there were many decent fighters around that weight at the time. But Benn ought to get some sort of credit.
Deca ... I've never read Tosche's book, so I have no opinion on the "contract buy out" theory other than that, between insiders and fans alike, there are enough people in and around the sport of boxing that it seems more people would have knowledge of said buy out, if in fact this buy out actually occurred. I guess I've never been one to believe a lot of things I read just because a biographer is presumed an expert on the subject matter. Lot of biographical accounts are quite tainted by the agendas and biases of their authors.Decagon wrote:Shit. Thanks for clearing that up. I should have known not to take anything in that book at face value after the part that says Moore took a dive against Marciano. With the contract evidence, Tosches's argument isn't that strong, although I bought into the idea that Liston surely didn't look anything like the fighter he'd been in earlier fights.Jaclem wrote:...the "liston camp buying ali's contract" story is in nick tosche's book "the devil and sonny listion". as far as i know it's a rumor and nothing more...can't find any documentation and tosches is not a reliable source. not saying it didn't happen...just asking for a better source and if anyone here knows of one, print it.
And now that the 1930 census has been made public, Tosches's theory that Liston was born in the 1920s has been blown to pieces as well.
I think it's not a matter of whether Ali literally couldn't see anything! It's more a matter of Ali's eyesight being impaired, kind of like anyone's would be if some kind of liniment got rubbed in there. If it had been applied to Liston's gloves between rounds, all he'd have had to do is manage to touch his gloves on Ali's face (very easy to do in a clinch) and Ali could've later spread it into his own eyes. Fighters touch their faces with their own gloves all the time to wipe away sweat.Decagon wrote:I know, but he's not hitting a guy who can't see. It's hard to understand how a blinded fighter - even Muhammad Ali - can defend himself better than all those guys Liston fought in 1958 through 1962.
For most of the 5th round Ali wasn't really defending himself, but was more in survival mode. As noted, he wasn't completely blinded, but had blurred vision, so he got on his bicycle to avoid being hit. He wasn't the first, nor the last fighter to "fight" like this, and it worked quite well as his vision improved later in the round so he could continue his beat down on the big, slow bully.Decagon wrote:I know, but he's not hitting a guy who can't see. It's hard to understand how a blinded fighter - even Muhammad Ali - can defend himself better than all those guys Liston fought in 1958 through 1962.