BoxRec

lirva33 wrote:

Max Molyneux wrote:Floyd's a phony who doesn't want the best. .

Could you possibly be any dumber?

Max Molyneux wrote: Hatton KO's him..

i guess I just got my answer to that question.

Max Molyneux wrote: He may have proved himself at Lightweight which I doubt .

Actually I wasn't right, you are completely dumb.

Max Molyneux wrote:but he ain't proved himself at Lightwelter .

Has Cotto? Has Maussa? Has Harris? Has Gatti? Or are only the people who have beaten Tszyu proved themselves?

Max Molyneux wrote:or Welter .

Who said he had proved himself at welter? He had one fight. Give him a chance.

Max Molyneux wrote: Hatton's style can work and beat Floyd, he didn't need it for Maussa although he did it anyway with him..

He got hit by Maussa many times. That was a poor performance by Hatton.

Max Molyneux wrote: Hatton did say after Maussa he wanted him didn't he? That look into my eyes stuff he was saying..

have you read the comments in the interview?

Your asking for a verbel beating and I'm one of the few who hasn't had a go at over a petty bet.

No Floyd hasn''t proven himself at either.

Hatton beat Tszyu who was the man and proved that he is the real deal. FLoyd beat a batter champ clubfighter.

One fight at welter isn't proven himself as the best there although Mitchell was better than that statue Gatti. Gatti was made for him and Brusseles was so easy he was even talking to the commentators while beating him!

HBO, Showtime and america need to stop fornicating with boxing.

I stuck up you for as well.

The interview was crap until proven Hatton did mention Mayweather. Yes it should of been better but Harris didn't Ko Maussa now did he and Cotto took longer.

Mayweather has a chance but he wants guys who'll make him look good. Fighting Zab Judah for christs sake.