it counts as a good win. williams was 31-1 at the time . however it doesnt count as much as beating a prime cleveland williams.You certainly count Satterfield's win over Cleveland Williams as a good win?
who do u take prime for prime williams vs satterfield
And Satterfield hit harder than Weaver, Coezee, Page etc? Umm no. Satterfield power is a myth
now we will defintley have to disagree with that. satterfield was one of the hardest hitters of all time.
i will go dig up a cyberboxingzone satterfield article for you to read
I didn't say the alpha champs only had a punchers chance. They would dominate Johnson, and ko him.
you must be joking right?
if harold johnson can beat eddie machen, whos better than most of the alpha champs, how the well will johnson be dominated by the alpha champs?
Johnson schooled Clarence Henry, who you think was a hard hitting heavyweight? Well, first of all Johnson won a Split Decison, thats not not schooling someone. Seconly, Henry was a very small heavyweight, not much bigger than Johnson. He wasn't a big puncher. He only had 19 kos in his whole career, only two over anyone noteworthy. who were the 2, Baker and Satterfield.
that because one judge was off mark, it happens.
henry scored 19 KO out of 34 wins. henry was a very skilled underated heavyweight who could wack with both hands
u forgot he knocked out irish bob murphy
You say skill beats size? Sometimes. It matters how how big of a difference the size is and how big a difference the skill level is. The alpha champs weren't the best champs but they all had decent skills, and were much bigger. Johnson wasn't that hard of a puncher for a lightheavy, they would walk through his punches
johnson had enough power, besides he was far too skilled and smart for the a lot of the alpha champs. johnson was extremley difficult to hit
