Page 2 of 2

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 17:16
by lvlarc
Roman is sllooww, telegraphing all his punches. Commentator said the HW div is terrible so the world is his (Roman' Oyster) Yeah right.

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 17:27
by steve689
I'm sorry but i don't think Greenberg will amount to anything, maybe a WBF/WBU champion.

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 17:38
by steve689
Your absolutely right Colin

:TU:

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 17:43
by kevo
God that was dull.

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 17:49
by BubiScholz
Greenberg is what I always said: just a piece of meat..... :-?

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 17:59
by Lefthookhappy19
Give the guy a break, he's a 23 year old heavyweight...

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 18:10
by steve689
Kosher? Ok sorry that was a crap joke.

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 18:10
by REAL_DEAL
2 questions

what happened to the hatton fight

and did Usenko really lose, he looked decent on the haye - gurov undercard.

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 18:18
by BubiScholz
Lefthookhappy19 wrote:Give the guy a break, he's a 23 year old heavyweight...
watch Dimitrenko or Povetkin. they are young too, but they have talent

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 18:52
by steve689
Matthew Hatton was on the card? I wondered why his mum was there in the crowd.

Re: Don't forget : Greenberg etc

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 19:04
by WildWaylon
TerribleTerry wrote:
THEBUTCH wrote:Sat 18th March 7.30pm Eurosport UK

LIVE Roman Greenberg v Alex Vassilev
My baby daughter has not been sleeping too well in recent evenings; this is the perfect answer.

Sit her down in front of the great white hype and watch her eye lids become heavy.. :TU:
Bet she sleeps like a log tonight - boring is an understatement, I nearly fell asleep myself

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 19:10
by WildWaylon
Freiheit wrote:The best fight IMO on the card is Christophe Canclaux (28-2, Sauerland boxer) vs Geard Ajetovic (11-0). I really hope Eurosport 1 will show this fight.

The card: http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=484607
They did and as predicted by you it was the best of the night

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 19:17
by WildWaylon
steve689 wrote:The commentary on the Ajetovic fight is very biased towards the Frenchman. Ajetovic isnt doing anything granted but Cancleaux is hitting gloves and arms, not much at all is actually getting through! Or am i seeing it wrong?
I think you needed to look closer at the face of Ajetovic, the punches did land but there were a lot of deflections also - best fight of the night though

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 19:22
by WildWaylon
steve689 wrote:Colin Hart: "I'd much rather complain about a referee letting it go on too long than one stopping it too early"

Steve Holdsworth : "Quite right Colin"

Who needs Duke McKenzie :lol:
I 2nd that and thanks for bringing up the quote

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 19:38
by WildWaylon
steve689 wrote:
Abbo wrote:Steve is sucking up a bit too much here for my liking. I respect Colin Hart for loving his sport, and knowing its history, but it's a bit much..
I haven't sucked up to anyone :o
I started to get confused about the fight I was watching with so much chatter about fights down the ages instead of concentrating on the fight in hand - Respect has been misunderstood for sucking up I think - "Lets not talk too much about blood with people eating" was a comment made and following that it was nothing but stories of bloodbaths - Steve is better on his own, giving interesting facts - They should get him on ITV

Posted: 18 Mar 2006, 19:49
by stujones
I have definately notice Steve is having a mid life crisis in his commentry of late.

These days he often comments on the ring card girls or any smart girls the camera views on in the crowd.

Its quite funny, keep it up - we are all thinking it Steve.

Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 11:07
by THEBUTCH
Greenberg didn't much for me, but a wins a win I suppose.

Couch looked comfortable taking the spoils against the Swiss guy and I was glad to see him get an easier nights work for a change.

Ajetovic was in a good scrap but is off his trolly if he thought he won the fight :o