Page 2 of 4
Posted: 28 Mar 2006, 17:22
by lirva33
jamesmcdonnell wrote:are you insane? What on earth would he need a rematch for, it's not like the fornicating first fight was close, these days having all the belts is not that important in determining who the best is.
After all, Larry Holmes never held all the belts, but there was little doubt he was the best heavyweight in the world.
People would argue that Gatti beat Boldomir who beat Judah who beat Spinks who beat Mayorga to be the champ and as such, Floyd isn't the champ.
Posted: 28 Mar 2006, 17:30
by nickd
Floyd will not be a true champ at 147 if he beats the Judah, that IBF belt is not worth a toss after Judah lost to Baldomir. I'm sure if he has to fight Gatti again he'd be happy to take the millions on offer for what is a piss easy fight.
Posted: 28 Mar 2006, 17:37
by lirva33
nickd wrote:Floyd will not be a true champ at 147 if he beats the Judah, that IBF belt is not worth a toss after Judah lost to Baldomir. I'm sure if he has to fight Gatti again he'd be happy to take the millions on offer for what is a piss easy fight.
How can Gatti be the champ over Floyd after what Floyd did to him. Does anyone think Gatti would beat floyd? Isn't is a little bit ridiculous to say Floyd has to give him another easy hiding again?
Posted: 28 Mar 2006, 17:40
by nickd
lirva33 wrote:nickd wrote:Floyd will not be a true champ at 147 if he beats the Judah, that IBF belt is not worth a toss after Judah lost to Baldomir. I'm sure if he has to fight Gatti again he'd be happy to take the millions on offer for what is a piss easy fight.
How can Gatti be the champ over Floyd after what Floyd did to him. Does anyone think Gatti would beat floyd? Isn't is a little bit ridiculous to say Floyd has to give him another easy hiding again?
Because Floyd beat Gatti at 140, if Gatti then beats the true champion at 147 he is the man until he gets beaten. Floyd is fighting a guy who lost his last fight for fucks sake!
Posted: 28 Mar 2006, 17:43
by steve689
Can't believe i missed Vargas-Mosley

Looking forward to Hosegawa-Sahaprom this friday though. Hopefully they will show Edwin Valero as well.
Posted: 28 Mar 2006, 20:12
by The Law
Loynesy wrote:Stream TV can be good, but sometimes the stream is too slow and the reception not too good. If I link my laptop to TV the reception isn't the post, watching it through a direct feed from a TV company is much better quality
Over the last
2 years I've only had problems with one fight on streamtv, which was for Rahman v Toney. The buffering lasted for 5 rounds in that fight, purely due to the bitrate, but this problem was fixed for the remainder of the fight. In my experience this was a one off.
I've watched well over 50 fights on streamtv and that was the only one that buffered for me
Maybe your firewall is interfering with your stream? Or maybe your isp? Or maybe your net speed? Or maybe your antivirus software? etc etc .......
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 01:21
by Timmbo
I also wrote to SKY and asked them to televise Toney Rahman fight and got a reply from them ;-
Dear Tim
Thank you for your email concerning the WBC Heavyweight Championship.
Unfortunately, Sky did not acquire the rights to the above fight and therefore will be unable to broadcast this event.
However, you may find that this match will broadcast on one of the terrestrial channels such as ITV and they can be contacted by telephone on 0870 600 6766.
I regret my response is not more positive. If you require any further help, please contact me at the above address.
If you would like more information on our services and packages, or you simply want to see what is going on in the world of News, Sport, Movies or Entertainment, please log onto http://www.sky.com <http://www.sky.com/>
"What do you want to watch? "
Thank you for taking the time to contact Sky.
Kind regards
Gwen Owenson
Viewer Relations
this is bulls**t as we all know. I dont think any of our emails get past their first line of defense,they just seem to bin them.BSKYB has millions of subscribers,will it really matter to them if a handful of boxing fans threaten to cancel their subscription?Our only hope for proper action is to get people in the trade who come/post on here (ie, commentators,writers,mc's etc) to address this issue directly with SKY on our behalf.
SKY's reply to my letter - Zab Zudah Vs Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 06:22
by Boxing Addict
Sky's reply to me letter;
Thanks for your email to us at Sky regarding boxing.
I was sorry to read of your dissatisfaction with the bouts scheduled to broadcast.
On our dedicated sports channels, we endeavour to screen as diverse a range of sport as possible in order to accommodate all viewers' tastes and interests, although we do appreciate that this may not always be possible. The emphasis of Sky Sports is on live and exclusive coverage of major events, which is often acclaimed. We also make a concerted effort to cover a wide range of minority events.
We do appreciate that boxing is a very popular sport. Unfortunately, at the present time, I am unable to confirm our future plans with regard to extending our coverage of this sport. However, it may be that in the future we will be able to provide more coverage.
Lee Haskins v Zolile Mbityi for the Commonwealth Flyweight Title, Simone Maludrottu v Damaen and Kelly for the European Bantanweight Title are two of the events scheduled for broadcast in April on Sky.
Unfortunately, Sky Sports does not currently hold any screening rights to the Zab Judah Vs Floyd Mayweather fight. However, your interest in this event has been noted and passed on to Sky Sports for their information.
Your interesting views and comments have been noted and passed to Sky Sports for their information.
We always welcome feedback and actively encourage viewers to express their observations.
If you would like more information on our services and packages, or you simply want to see what is going on in the world of News, Sport, Movies or Entertainment, please log onto
http://www.sky.com
"What do you want to watch? "
Kind regards
Helen Forbes
Viewer Relations
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 06:27
by nickd
Not looking that rosy. However they have been known to pick up the rights to a fight in the days leading up to it - I guess they can get it a knockdown price then if nobody else in the UK has picked up the rights for it.
Sky would be mad not to pick this one up, with a Hatton v Mayweather PPV looming they need to get as much Mayweather exposure to the casual fan as possible.
Lets push Sky to put it on
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 06:29
by Boxing Addict
In Sky's response they said they have noted my interest for this event, if enough of us request this fight they might do it,
Common everyone do a quick e-mail to sky telling them they must show this fight live!
[/url]
[email protected]
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 06:34
by nickd
Done.
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 07:41
by Max Molyneux
Mattyp151 wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Imagine if Gatti beats Baldomir and Floyd beats Judah!
They'll be calling Mayweather undisputed!

Well, I wouldn't call him undisputed until he beats Gatti for the belts. Yes, he handed Gatti his chin on a platter the first time, and if he has to fight Gatti for the belts again, so be it. But if he does win them, then you can't deny him as the Undisputed Welter champ.
Yeah you won't.
Just maybe the odd fan will saying he won't need to beat him again.
I don't have sky sports so I ain't emailing them and Zab's just lost so this is a pointless title shot to watch.
Moderators sticky this please
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 07:46
by Boxing Addict
Moderators sticky this place
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 08:37
by Cuban Lion
So this is what it's come to.
We are going out of our way just so greedy Sky can show a fight that they should be obliged to show anyway.
ITV have overtook skyand now channel five have overtook sky.
sky have 4 dedicated sports channels!!
They only show 1 fight a week on 4 channels,that's 2 hours a week.
Why not show Lamon Brewster this saturday(he's NEVER even been shown on sky)
Betting
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 10:24
by Boxing Addict
Judah losts to Baldomir for a reason -
Now Judah is a massive underdog with the bookies and odds against, a lot of money can be made if he wins!
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 11:04
by jamesmcdonnell
lirva33 wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:are you insane? What on earth would he need a rematch for, it's not like the fornicating first fight was close, these days having all the belts is not that important in determining who the best is.
After all, Larry Holmes never held all the belts, but there was little doubt he was the best heavyweight in the world.
People would argue that Gatti beat Boldomir who beat Judah who beat Spinks who beat Mayorga to be the champ and as such, Floyd isn't the champ.
?They might, but they would be talking out of their arses. If the fight was competitive then they'd have a point, but as Mayweather used him as a punch bag, it's a silly point of contention.
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 11:22
by nickd
Will Sky be televising Floyd Mayweather v Zab Judah on April 8th? I am really interested in seeing this bout.
With a Ricky Hatton v Mayweather pay per view looming surely it makes sense to broadcast this fight to maximise PPV numbers later?
Regards,
Nick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Nick
Thanks for your email regarding the Floyd Mayweather v Zab Judah fight.
Sky Sports do not have the rights to broadcast this event. However, your interest in this fight and your comments have been noted and passed to Sky Sports for their information.
Thanks for taking the time to contact Sky.
Kind regards
Helen Forbes
Viewer Relations
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How about buying the rights then?
No other UK network is showing the fight so it must be available.
How on earth do you expect sports fans to pay out £15 for every Ricky Hatton fight when you wont even show his future opponents fights? Scandalous.
Regards,
Nick
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 11:27
by jamesmcdonnell
In other words, no.
Great, I wasn't prepared to pay PPV for this, but a delayed telecast would have been nice.
Screw it, I'm cancelling sky then.
Posted: 29 Mar 2006, 12:59
by MightyWarrior
"
However, you may find that this match will broadcast on one of the terrestrial channels such as ITV and they can be contacted by telephone on 0870 600 6766. "
In other words.....f*** off.

What a brush off that is....
Anyway, these muppets replying wont have a clue who PBF & Judah are anyway. It'll be decided by the money men nearer the time, in an effort to get it at cut rate.
Wonder how much King was gonna ask for rights before Zab blew his world title, must be due a 50% discount after that disaster....
Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 05:11
by nickd
Looks like a definite no.
WHAT A FOOKING COP OUT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Nick
Thank you for your email regarding the Floyd Mayweather v Zab Judah fight.
I was sorry to hear of your disappointment with our previous response.
You may wish to enquire to ITV at
[email protected] or call 08700 100 222 as this channel has been broadcasting boxing on a regular basis at the weekends.
As previously advised your interest on this event has been passed to Sky Sports.
Thank you for your interest in Sky.
Kind regards
Audrey McCann
Viewer Relations
Definate No
Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 05:14
by Boxing Addict
Sky's responce : DEFINATE NO
Dear Bhuta
Thank you for your e-mail about the Zab Judah v Floyd Mayweather fight.
Unfortunately, there are no plans to broadcast this fight on Sky Sports or Box Office. However, all points raised in your e-mail have been noted and passed on to Sky Sports for their information.
I regret my response was not more favourable.
Thank you for your interest in Sky.
Kind regards
Gordon Smith
Viewer Relations
My second letter -
Why doesn't SKY buy the rights to screen this fight. SKY haven't shown a big fight live for a long while?
SKY should be able to buy the UK rights because no one else is showing it. What I don't understand, and please explain is that in some years SKY show all the big fights live but then this year all the big fights have been missed. SKY should be consistent, either show all the big fights live or nothing at all !
This is probably the biggest fight this year along with Castillo Vs Corrales III and Pacquio Vs Morales III (If it happens).
SKY should leave the fights from Japan and so what if SKY miss out a few Friday slots at least the cream of the crop, the main prize-fights , the big fights are shown live then boxing fans will be happy. Even if SKY don't show fights every week but only show the big fights....
If SKY want the British public to buy the next Hatton fight which is at the same weight then surely they should screen this one, merely as an advertising tool for the inevitable Hatton Vs Mayweather fight, which probably will be massive PPV. (You always showed Barrera fights before Hamed fought him and the interest in that fight was massive, nearly the whole of the UK watched it).
With allegedly leaving SKY and moving to ITV, I thought SKY would have a lot of extra money and would pick and choose the big fights, but what I have seen so far is less big fights and more concentration on better domestic fights, which is good but SKY cannot miss out on the major fights from the capital of boxing; USA.
Both Zab Zudah and Floyd Mayweather are well known worldwide, have been shown on SKY (LIVE) a good few times and I bet you my life that other countries in Europe are showing it live. Undercard is brilliant as well. How can SKY SPORTS not show these major fights. SKY is the only chance the British fans can see these fights. Do it on Box Office !
All the major wrestling events are shown, be it some on box office. Why not boxing events ? The major fights are the major fights. Its all good saying that SKY will only show British, commonwealth and European fights along with some overseas fights but in boxing there are pound for pound great fighters, undisputed world champions who draw massive audiences worldwide and British fans should have the right to watch these like the rest of the world.
All the fights on this card involve exciting, talented fighters, some pound for pound the best fighters in the world. It is a MUST SEE for boxing fans. I just can't believe SKY are not screening this one.
The reason why I complain is that I remember over the last couple of years all the major fights have been shown on SKY either live or a days delay, but this year has been really disappointing, no big fights at all apart from Morales Vs Pacquio (days delay) and Mosley Vs Vargas (3 weeks delay). Which makes British boxing fans really sad to live in the UK.
I have to say the recent Calzaghe Vs Lacy fight on ITV was done very well and hope that they show the big, major fights again.
I will definitely be cancelling my SKY subscription if SKY don't screen this great prize-fight.
Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 05:19
by lirva33
We should find a place where we can all DOWNLOAD the fight without KNOWING THE RESULT. perhaps a website?
Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 05:28
by lirva33
http://www.worldboxingvideoarchive.com/
Nickd says we can all downlod iit here on sunday morning??
Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 05:48
by nickd
You can download a torrent of the fight on there yes. You'll need a torrent client on your PC, just download and install Azureus if you dont already have one. Search for it on google. Then find the fight on worldboxingvideoarchive and download the torrent from there. Sometimes they can be on there within a few hours of the fight finishing.
E-Mail SKY
Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 06:08
by Boxing Addict
Why don't everyone e-mail SKY and make them understand their getting the boxing all wrong and the interest in these big fights is massive.
A quick e-mail requesting Zab Judah Vs Floyd Mayweather will do
Common
[email protected]