Page 2 of 2

Posted: 18 May 2006, 12:54
by kerrminator
The 1st postponement was nothing to do with Scott or Guzman, it was Warren who had messed up by double booking the Harrison v Guzman fight and the Skelton v Williams fights on the same night then told both camps that the Harrison v Guzman was to be postponed.

The 2nd postponement was due to a mouth abcess/gum infection (agony may i add) where Scott recieved dental surgery.

The 3rd postponement was Guzman deciding he was not wanting to fight just 2 or 3 weeks before fight night (hardly the actions of a confident challenger)

Posted: 18 May 2006, 13:26
by nickd
Well there is no denying he made the right choice or he'd be high and dry for a third time this week with no fight.

...

Posted: 18 May 2006, 19:14
by Unknown
The 1st postponement was nothing to do with Scott or Guzman, it was Warren who had messed up by double booking the Harrison v Guzman fight and the Skelton v Williams fights on the same night then told both camps that the Harrison v Guzman was to be postponed.


What are you talking about? Both fights were suppose to be on the same card.

Oh and by the way it sure seems to have been planned. Warren and Maloney DIDN'T want Harrison to fight Guzman. Taht was publically revealed.