Sugar Ray Leonard was dull.

Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17007
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Post by Seamus »

Davey Pearl's a good referee. I'm sure he took note of Hearns legs' giving out from just a push from Leonard before the beginning of the big onslaught in the 13th. Obviously in the 50's or even 60's the bout would have gone on longer, but by 81, things had changed.
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: Sugar Ray Leonard was dull.

Post by Collins2000 »

viciousmaussa wrote:
silkov wrote:
viciousmaussa wrote:ok, the first 5 then, feint and run
Its called boxing actually! :TU:
very little punching. i'll bet ppl were shcoked at the time. being that he was called 'sugar' you'd think he would've found a quicker way of adjusting to the superior reach of hearns


Hearns was a pretty awesome boxer / puncher himself at that point. The fact that Leonard DID solve the Hearns riddle and batter him into a stoppage defeat is what really counts.

I do think Hearns deserved the W in the rematch though. But both were a little overdone by then.

:o
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Post by Collins2000 »

Seamus wrote:Davey Pearl's a good referee. I'm sure he took note of Hearns legs' giving out from just a push from Leonard before the beginning of the big onslaught in the 13th. Obviously in the 50's or even 60's the bout would have gone on longer, but by 81, things had changed.
It looked a correct stoppage to me at the time and still does. Hearns was gone. Howard Cosell started ranting it was premature but after the replays he changed his mind. Not that Howard actually knew much about what was happening in a ring. Great interviewer though. And, as been said in here 1000 times, very good at adding gravitas (is that the correct word, boxbuzz?) to a fight.

:o
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

gravitas....weight.....enhanced importance.......I concur.....
Post Reply