Posted: 05 Aug 2006, 07:12
Norris was a far better all round fighter than Vargas, who must be the most overrated fighter of the past 20 years imo...
I'm not supportive that Norris was more versatile then Vargas, but I have constantly thought of Fernando Vargas as an overestimated fighter. He is a warrior no doubt about it, but not as good as most people assert.silkov wrote:Norris was a far better all round fighter than Vargas, who must be the most overrated fighter of the past 20 years imo...
Norris in his prime was a far better boxer and much faster than Vargas... the only thing they really have in common is fighting at 154...AndreWardFan2006 wrote:I'm not supportive that Norris was more versatile then Vargas, but I have constantly thought of Fernando Vargas as an overestimated fighter. He is a warrior no doubt about it, but not as good as most people assert.silkov wrote:Norris was a far better all round fighter than Vargas, who must be the most overrated fighter of the past 20 years imo...
~A.W.F~
Norris didn't box anyone's ears off in that fight .overhand_right wrote:
Still say Norris is infinitely more skilled than flat footed slow moving right hand happy Vargas though. Ive never seen Vargas box someones ears off like Norris did Simon Brown in the rematch- awesome.