Calzaghe has had nine years as a champion. Kessler's in his 2nd year. It's unfair to say that he's had beter comp than kessler. In nine years time will Calzaghe's levekl of comp be close to Kessler's?glahn wrote:Kessler looks good, but let's face it, he's fairly unproven. Beyer and Calzaghe have both faced better opposition than him thus far. So while Kessler might prove to be world class in the long run, there's no way you can say that he's better than Calzaghe yet.
I know Calzaghe's an excellent fighter. But he's been allowed to get away with too much.
Every meaningful fight he had (Eubank, Brewer, Reid, Mitchell, Woodhall, Lacy) was counterbalanced by stooping down to the likes of Pudwill, Ashira, Salem. Let's face it, and let's be cynical: Calzaghe & SN took the fvcking piss out of us all in 2004-5! Kessler doesn't mess about & if you look on his record, he even traveled to the home country of a very difficult opponent.
The year or 2 before he won the title, Kessler has been in serious fights: former middle titlist JC Green, former super middle titlist Thobela, hard headed Andre Thysse (has anyone else stopped this man, wicked puncher Lucian Bute couldn't!), Siaca (a man who was robbed v Byron Mitchell and who beat Mundine), Mundine (who looked great in his last fight &has been a titlist himself), Lucas (whom most felt beat the very good Beyer). & Kessler broke Lucas' face to pieces with the jab.