Posted: 25 Aug 2006, 15:35
No doubt.evndrbsn wrote:I'll go out on a limb and say 90's Foreman had faster handspeed than Marciano too.
BoxRec
Foreman 1973 vs. Foreman 1991
Page 2 of 2
Posted: 25 Aug 2006, 15:46
DEFINTLEY!The Great John L wrote:No doubt.evndrbsn wrote:I'll go out on a limb and say 90's Foreman had faster handspeed than Marciano too.
Foreman
Posted: 26 Aug 2006, 13:14
Youth must be served
Forty year olds don't beat 20 year olds, unless the 40 year old is so vastly supertor in talent that the age factoe doesn't come into play. Everything being equal the 40 year old, even on steroids has no chance.
Boxing is a young mans game. Only the very best are able to compete into their forties. The Foreman of the 70's an easy winner.
Forty year olds don't beat 20 year olds, unless the 40 year old is so vastly supertor in talent that the age factoe doesn't come into play. Everything being equal the 40 year old, even on steroids has no chance.
Boxing is a young mans game. Only the very best are able to compete into their forties. The Foreman of the 70's an easy winner.