Page 2 of 2

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Posted: 09 Nov 2013, 16:28
by HomicideHenry
Duran just had more than LaMotta in everything. The only benefit LaMotta would of had is that he was able to slip punches better than people acknowledge, and that he was often fighting at light heavyweight--- too big and strong and too tough to be hurt by Duran. It would go all 15 rounds, maybe with a 8-3-1 decision for the Hands of Stone.

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Posted: 09 Nov 2013, 17:04
by SaadOffTheDeck
HomicideHenry wrote: It would go all 15 rounds, maybe with a 8-3-1 decision for the Hands of Stone.
:lol:

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Posted: 09 Nov 2013, 17:07
by ThatOne
Duran was a great fighter but he wouldbe fighting too far out of weight to prevail over a natural middleweight as good as the Bronx Bull.

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Posted: 09 Nov 2013, 17:30
by Giancarlo
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote: It would go all 15 rounds, maybe with a 8-3-1 decision for the Hands of Stone.
:lol:

That's epic.

:lol:

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Posted: 09 Nov 2013, 17:40
by SaadOffTheDeck
Hank is comic gold.

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 17:10
by HomicideHenry
Lol, just noticed my mistake, was thinking 12 rounds instead of 15.

In 12 rounder, 8-3-1 Duran

In 15 rounder, 10-4-1 Duran