Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 06:04
caster wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Because he is a coward
Because he is a coward
Page 2 of 2
Because he is a coward
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 06:16
jangeorg wrote:caster wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Because he is a coward
.....and Kessler is a kujon!!
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 06:58
caster wrote:jangeorg wrote:caster wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Because he is a coward
.....and Kessler is a kujon!!
How can he be this,Kessler offer Calzaghe $3,4 to fight him and Calzaghe refuse the offer,so who is a coward/kujon
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 13:26
You seriously rate him above Lennox Lewis???caster wrote:In my opinion, he's the best British boxer I've seen (but I'm only 41). When I saw him as an amateur I thought he'd be something special.
Well, at least Kessler is waiting to fight him.I think he would beat Kessler and Hopkins, but I agree his record should have been populated with wins over some of the bigger names.
He doesn't give them a chance to realize.I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 19:33
Aye, but people focus more on the opposition he fights than his talent.I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Sometimes Opposition doesn't say how good you are in some cases, he's shown how good he is though. People thought Hatton was overated and would of been beaten when he stepped up and made Tszyu quit.
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 21:24
When?Max Molyneux wrote:Aye, but people focus more on the opposition he fights than his talent.I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Sometimes Opposition doesn't say how good you are in some cases, he's shown how good he is though.
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 21:37
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 22:22
Ah, I guess you mean the Bika fight.Max Molyneux wrote:
Posted: 31 Dec 2006, 22:30
Bika was solid opponent and Vicious Maussa was right but no I don't mean Bika. When he kept to his skills he showed he was in leagues about Bika.
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 08:19
On the contrary - I WAS WRONG.Max Molyneux wrote:Bika was solid opponent and Vicious Maussa was right but no I don't mean Bika. When he kept to his skills he showed he was in leagues about Bika.
Unless - Bika goes on to do big things.
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 11:34
So know your going against what you said? He was strong in the fight.
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 13:37
NOW. YOU'REMax Molyneux wrote:So know your going against what you said? He was strong in the fight.
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 13:51
Does it matter if I made a spelling mistake? 
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 13:59
No. The spelling mistake does not matter.Max Molyneux wrote:Does it matter if I made a spelling mistake?
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 14:10
Not really Max. I'm just pissed. But poor spelling and grammar really get my goat, as it were. In vino veritas and all that.Max Molyneux wrote:Does it matter if I made a spelling mistake?