Posted: 17 Jan 2007, 07:40
thats fast for a big man but i can well believe it.
sprint king michael johnson has a theory that even with modern diets and training the athlete`s these days arent that much faster than the athlete`s back in the day.
he took the example of harold abrhams who won the 1924 olympics in a time around 10.2 or 10.3 (i forget exactly)
then he looked at the fastest men now who run 9.77 or thereabouts.
thats only half a second difference in almost a century and johnson said that half a second could easily be accounted for by the use of proper starting blocks, fast rubberised surfaces as opposed to cinder tracks and better footwear and clothing.
in the old days sprinters used to take a trowel onto the track and dig themselves a couple of holes to start from.
interesting theory.
sprint king michael johnson has a theory that even with modern diets and training the athlete`s these days arent that much faster than the athlete`s back in the day.
he took the example of harold abrhams who won the 1924 olympics in a time around 10.2 or 10.3 (i forget exactly)
then he looked at the fastest men now who run 9.77 or thereabouts.
thats only half a second difference in almost a century and johnson said that half a second could easily be accounted for by the use of proper starting blocks, fast rubberised surfaces as opposed to cinder tracks and better footwear and clothing.
in the old days sprinters used to take a trowel onto the track and dig themselves a couple of holes to start from.
interesting theory.