Page 2 of 2

Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 08:17
by J
nioce to see the ame old double standards still knocking aorund, so Witter is allowed to bad mouthy Hatton but Hatton isnt allowed to reply ?

And Nick come on if you are serriously suggesting the likes of Colin lynes are up there then you youve been out on it a bit too much mate :lol:

anyway too boring for words all this really. Im past caring whehter they fight or not..id be happy with castillo next at the expense of witter and so should most real boxing fans. :TU:

Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 10:02
by J
search wrote:
J wrote:nioce to see the ame old double standards still knocking aorund, so Witter is allowed to bad mouthy Hatton but Hatton isnt allowed to reply ?

And Nick come on if you are serriously suggesting the likes of Colin lynes are up there then you youve been out on it a bit too much mate :lol:

anyway too boring for words all this really. Im past caring whehter they fight or not..id be happy with castillo next at the expense of witter and so should most real boxing fans. :TU:
people like J mention the lines fight continually but do they forget the carlos wilfredo vilches fight when hatton was just in it to make money and was saying in his corner, "I don't feel too good" etc. Do they forget the Thaxton fight when Hatton should have been stopped on cuts? Do they forget when he got belted around the ring against Collazo and lost the fight on a lot of ringside scorecards and ran from a rematch? Should I go on?
:roll: the vilches fight was how long ago, the lynes fight was last year. im sure you can see the point I could go on to make or shoudl I go on.
:TU:

Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 12:56
by Twinkle Toes
Search is Lirva - Dont take the bait.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:10
by J
thanks :TU: knew that already hence i havent been. :wink: