Posted: 23 Feb 2007, 11:47
allegedly, Michael Pass and the Poster might have called Ricky a world champion.... but Ricky never did.
He still counts the WBU as a world title hes held, didn't he say him versus Tyszu would be 2 world champions meeting? Maybe Hatton actually believed WBU was a legit title as he still counts it as a belt hes heldstujones wrote:allegedly allegedly, Michael Pass and the Poster might have called Ricky a world champion.... but Ricky never did.
Exactly, it's an absolute joke.don't call it a comeback wrote:I'm sorry but thats a laughable comparison.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Ricky fought bums for 30+ fights whiole calling himself a world champion - thats the defintion of a fraud. As is calling yourself the best in the world while avoiding top comptition and blatantly avoiding your top domestic rival while prefering the Urangos of this world. Hattons hyped himself up in his own little way and had his trainer claiming Rickys the best British fighter ever. As for bad mouthing opponent - is Audley even that bad at that and Hattons badmouthed Witter a fair bit.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Last time I checked Ricky Hatton was the ring magazine's #1 140 lb fighter, and he beat Kostya Tszyu.
Ricky also never made wild and extravagant claims about himself, he's never bad mouthed his opponents, and he is always humble when he wins. He's more humble when he wins, that Audley is in defeat.
I don't hate Audley, I've never even met the man, he might be a lovely bloke, but his public persona has been irritating in the extreme, and his career has been a shambolic farce.
At least Audley fought his top British rivals![]()
Hatton and Audley have marketed themselves in the exact same way, Audley wasn't quite good enough to pull off the hype. Rickys pulled off the hype by avoiding the best competition but they're both hype jobs one beloved and one hated. To me there from the same cloth.
I cannot remember him ever saying 2 world champions meeting to describe his fight with Tszyu. Sure he did say on other occasions - WBU belt and defending the WBU belt. But he never said "I am a world champion" I am making a defence of my world title.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:He still counts the WBU as a world title hes held, didn't he say him versus Tyszu would be 2 world champions meeting? Maybe Hatton actually believed WBU was a legit title as he still counts it as a belt hes heldstujones wrote:allegedly allegedly allegedly, Michael Pass and the Poster might have called Ricky a world champion.... but Ricky never did.
Exactly, good post - Thing is AH is not really the brightest light on the Christmas tree is he.nickd wrote:He should have said
"I put my hands up, I wasn't good enough on the night but I will try and fix things in the gym, imrpove and look to come back better and stronger"
That would have been acceptable and humble.
Not this shit which smacks of "I don't wanna make excuses BUT...."
Only you could post such tripe, but congratulations on again turning another thread into a pro Witter, Anti Hatton rant.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Ricky fought bums for 30+ fights whiole calling himself a world champion - thats the defintion of a fraud. As is calling yourself the best in the world while avoiding top comptition and blatantly avoiding your top domestic rival while prefering the Urangos of this world. Hattons hyped himself up in his own little way and had his trainer claiming Rickys the best British fighter ever. As for bad mouthing opponent - is Audley even that bad at that and Hattons badmouthed Witter a fair bit.
Your missing the point, I'm not claiming Audley is P4P as good as Hatton because he clearly is not. What I'm saying is they are both bype jobs, claiming to be the best while fighting mediocre competition. Hatton had not fought a top10 opponent prior to Tyszu and it could be argued hasn't since. They are both claiming to be something they clearly aren't but that is what the boxing business is about and most products we buy claim to be something they aren'tjamesmcdonnell wrote:Exactly, it's an absolute joke.don't call it a comeback wrote:I'm sorry but thats a laughable comparison.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote: Ricky fought bums for 30+ fights whiole calling himself a world champion - thats the defintion of a fraud. As is calling yourself the best in the world while avoiding top comptition and blatantly avoiding your top domestic rival while prefering the Urangos of this world. Hattons hyped himself up in his own little way and had his trainer claiming Rickys the best British fighter ever. As for bad mouthing opponent - is Audley even that bad at that and Hattons badmouthed Witter a fair bit.
At least Audley fought his top British rivals![]()
Hatton and Audley have marketed themselves in the exact same way, Audley wasn't quite good enough to pull off the hype. Rickys pulled off the hype by avoiding the best competition but they're both hype jobs one beloved and one hated. To me there from the same cloth.
Magee and Thaxton, two of Hatton's earlier career wins, are better than anything Audley has achieved. Thaxton is at least on sprott's level, and Magee was superior in terms of class.
Hatton's wins over Tackie, Stewart, Maussa, Urango and Tszyu absolutely annihilate anything Audley will or ever did achieve.
Hatton has never once that I can think of given it the big one before or after a fight, and as rightly pointed out, he never called himself a world champ, at least not to my knowledge, until after he beat Tszyu.
I'm sorry, but you're clutching at straws here, there's no comparison between either the public conduct or achievements of ricky Hatton and Audley Harrison, it's like comparing a set of roller skates and a ferrari.
Its about comparing 2 similar situations - read the rest of my thread I was defending Audley and simply poiting out other fighters like Hatton who fans like yourself are completely in love with are guilty of the same behaviour. I haven't got anything against journeyman, but 'bum' is the phrase used in the boxing business to describe the zero threat competition Hatton faced pre-Tyszu.Twinkle Toes wrote:Only you could post such tripe, but congratulations on again turning another thread into a pro Witter, Anti Hatton rant.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Ricky fought bums for 30+ fights whiole calling himself a world champion - thats the defintion of a fraud. As is calling yourself the best in the world while avoiding top comptition and blatantly avoiding your top domestic rival while prefering the Urangos of this world. Hattons hyped himself up in his own little way and had his trainer claiming Rickys the best British fighter ever. As for bad mouthing opponent - is Audley even that bad at that and Hattons badmouthed Witter a fair bit.
But worse than that you should never call a boxer a bum - A boxing fan, you certainly are not.
Williams by been domestic class is a league above Mike Stewart - I'm being pedantic I know. Williams career isn't a bad 1 and if he was actually condition IMO would be world class. Wins over Tyson (faded or not), Sprott, Meehan (who was robbed against Brewster), Skeleton, Potter, Francis alongside a valiant effort against Vitali make him possibly top10 at career best. At Williams best he'd twat Sinal Sam - what did he have wrong with him shingles?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Bollocks mate, Danny has never been anything more than domestic class. He beat a faded Mike Tyson, in a career best performance, but he wasn't good enough to beat even Samil Sam. I like Danny, he's a gutsy bloke, but he was never anywhere near world class, and by the time Audley beat him, was in awful mental and physical shape......jog on.
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:One again I'm not comparing them as fighters I'm comparing them as selling a product thats much poorer than it is hyped up to be. And to say Hatton has only avoided Witter simply isn't true
They are not similar situations at all though - So your comparison is hugely floored, and you know it. Trouble is you've spouted some shite in your continued effort's to discredit Hatton and now don't know how to back track your way out of it.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Its about comparing 2 similar situations - read the rest of my thread I was defending Audley and simply poiting out other fighters like Hatton who fans like yourself are completely in love with are guilty of the same behaviour. I haven't got anything against journeyman, but 'bum' is the phrase used in the boxing business to describe the zero threat competition Hatton faced pre-Tyszu.
Yes you are a Hatton lover because you can't take any Hatton criticism. If you examine my post history you'll find I give plenty of credit to Hatton who if you examine my posts I actually sometimes pick to beat Witter - yes shock horror. At the moment I think Witter would beat him handilly. I go back on forthon that 1 but its not like we'll ever get to see it.Twinkle Toes wrote:They are not similar situations at all though - So your comparison is hugely floored, and you know it. Trouble is you've spouted some shite in your continued effort's to discredit Hatton and now don't know how to back track your way out of it.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Its about comparing 2 similar situations - read the rest of my thread I was defending Audley and simply poiting out other fighters like Hatton who fans like yourself are completely in love with are guilty of the same behaviour. I haven't got anything against journeyman, but 'bum' is the phrase used in the boxing business to describe the zero threat competition Hatton faced pre-Tyszu.
As for the Hatton lover comments?
First and foremost I am a boxing fan and I would put my house on it that I have been to more boxing shows than you have, and ironically I'd lay the same stake that I have been to more Witter shows than you.
You're a typical armchair viewer hence the loose tongue when describing a fighter as a bum, So congratulations on labeling 'fighters' like Magee and Thaxton with that brush - Do you feel so clever now? - Because you certainly don't look it.
Very good, but how dare he be better off than fighters such as Jesus Chavez and Joel Casamayor - geniune world titlist and geniune hard men.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:This point has got out of hand. I was defending Audley with the comparison. The sports about hype and its about believing your the best and about fighting fights for the most amount of money. Audleys done his best on limited talent, he was never world class but why be angry at him for making good money from limited talent? Because he dared to trash talk the great Skeleton before they squared off, how dare heor is it because hes richer than most people here, how dare he
I think that's true to a degree. Certainly against Williams first time round he was hugely over cautious. I mean even with the KD he could've won that fight if he'd maintained a decent workrate through the earlier rounds. His downfall this time was probably a case of throwing caution to the wind. He got involved with Sprott when he could've controlled the fight-- with a good workrate-- from the outside.nickd wrote:I don't think Harrison ever really did believe in himself, hence his overcautious attitude. He always knew his chin would let him down at some stage.
The point was already out of hand when you tried to make the Hatton/Harrison comparison. If you want to defend Harrison, by all means do so on its own merits. He hustled good money out of his Olympic success and good on him for that. If that’s how he wants to be remembered I’d give him a slap on the back. But I’d doubt that he would appreciate it. His problem lay in the grand canyon-like gap in what he said and what he believed and in what he was able to deliver.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:This point has got out of hand. I was defending Audley with the comparison. The sports about hype and its about believing your the best and about fighting fights for the most amount of money. Audleys done his best on limited talent, he was never world class but why be angry at him for making good money from limited talent? Because he dared to trash talk the great Skeleton before they squared off, how dare heor is it because hes richer than most people here, how dare he