Posted: 08 May 2007, 09:17
holyfield and gatti unnafected...what planet are you on?
So, what's your definition of being uneffected? At the moment it seems to be anybody who can make it to stand can make it to a ring?jimmywils wrote:Well,they are both still fighting arent they? Are they being fed by their families because they cant feed themselves?
I think you will find the answer is yes to both questions pal
I didnt mean literally uneffected. Im sure their licences would be revoked if they couldnt walk to the ring.
Totally agreeOld bones Ian wrote:Thing is boxing is a matter of choice, as long as a boxer passes all the medical examinations then he should be allowed to box. I'm not saying i'm keen on people like Holyfield etc boxing , but its their choice.
Other wise boxing will not be able to keep going, look at alot of Journymen, should they still get a licience even though they've lost a few fights in a row. These guys probably take more punches through there career and suffer more knockdowns and knockouts than top level boxers, but they keep going , and don't forget that they are usually used as sparring partners as well.
Boxing is a dangerous sport, but its a free world, if a guy passes the tests then let him box
I disagree with this statement. These journeymen fighters tend to take a lot less punishment, they cannot afford to get knocked out as they won't be able to fight again in the next few weeks.Old bones Ian wrote:Thing is boxing is a matter of choice, as long as a boxer passes all the medical examinations then he should be allowed to box. I'm not saying i'm keen on people like Holyfield etc boxing , but its their choice.
Other wise boxing will not be able to keep going, look at alot of Journymen, should they still get a licience even though they've lost a few fights in a row. These guys probably take more punches through there career and suffer more knockdowns and knockouts than top level boxers, but they keep going , and don't forget that they are usually used as sparring partners as well.
Boxing is a dangerous sport, but its a free world, if a guy passes the tests then let him box
What?.... so a fighter has to be as damaged as Watson or Mcclellen before he is stopped from fighting??.... I hope your not on any boxing boards or doing any promotions mate... Ali could still do some training /sparring in the 90s... would you have given him a license to fight then??....jimmywils wrote:My point being that if Holyfield is able to fight, then he isnt classed as 'disabled'. Yeh, ok , my choice of words (unaffected) may have been a bit naive but regardless of wether he is banned in some states or not, he still fights on and is still ranked in many organisations.
The same cant be said for the G-Man or Micheal Watson
Of course, as you know Leon Spinks & Aaron Pryor were often on the same amateur team for international matches both were very close friends, both had simular styles in the ring both abused their bodies with drugs and drink. Now they are both in a bad way.silkov wrote:Dont forget also long Amatuer careers, Aaron Pryor has the same illness that Jerry Quarry had and puts it partly down to all the amatuer fights that he had...KOJOE90 wrote:It's always so sad to see a fighter suffer with his health when still a relatively young man. This is even more moving when it's such a fine fighter as Tommy Hearns who has given us so many thrills over the years.
Iran Barkley is also talking about making a comeback and there are already ugly whispers of a Hearns vs Barkley III fight, truely horrific thought.
It does sadly appear that all those tough fights have took their toll on Tommy. Add on top of that countess gym wars in the Kronk Gym, which were often by all accounts quite brutal.
Maybe James, or we just don't hear about the journymen when they have retired , its very unusual to read an interview from a journeyman of the 60s or 70's . So these guys could have alot of problems , but we would never know.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I disagree with this statement. These journeymen fighters tend to take a lot less punishment, they cannot afford to get knocked out as they won't be able to fight again in the next few weeks.Old bones Ian wrote:Thing is boxing is a matter of choice, as long as a boxer passes all the medical examinations then he should be allowed to box. I'm not saying i'm keen on people like Holyfield etc boxing , but its their choice.
Other wise boxing will not be able to keep going, look at alot of Journymen, should they still get a licience even though they've lost a few fights in a row. These guys probably take more punches through there career and suffer more knockdowns and knockouts than top level boxers, but they keep going , and don't forget that they are usually used as sparring partners as well.
Boxing is a dangerous sport, but its a free world, if a guy passes the tests then let him box
The biggest danger is older fighters with a lot of wear and tear, competing at top level against young hungry lions looking to put a name on their record.
A guy who comes to mug, survive, and pick up a paycheck, is not in as much danger as an old past it fighter, trading on memory, looking to prove all his critics wrong. Holyfield has always been a warrior, and my major concern would be him getting a title shot against the likes of Wlad Klitchsko, and surviving a horrific beating over the full 12 rounds and taking big punches which are going to worsen his long term prognosis. This isn't beyond the realms of possibility, as Holyfield is still a marquee name, and Wlad has already shown he is quite willing to face off against fighters who are either past it (mercer), or are a level below him in routine title defences. Holyfield is possibly only one win away from a title shot, given the piss poor state of the division.
Hang on a sec champ. First of all, my original point (which seems like many posts ago) was that it only takes one punch to disable or god forbid, kill a boxer. Evander Holyfield has a licence to box, given to him after medical examinations, no matter how dubious those examinations are. Would Ali pass an examination? No. Would Micheal Watson? No.silkov wrote:What?.... so a fighter has to be as damaged as Watson or Mcclellen before he is stopped from fighting??.... I hope your not on any boxing boards or doing any promotions mate... Ali could still do some training /sparring in the 90s... would you have given him a license to fight then??....jimmywils wrote:My point being that if Holyfield is able to fight, then he isnt classed as 'disabled'. Yeh, ok , my choice of words (unaffected) may have been a bit naive but regardless of wether he is banned in some states or not, he still fights on and is still ranked in many organisations.
The same cant be said for the G-Man or Micheal Watson
Which just goes to show that fighters should be judged on more than just the results of a medical exam for their ability to fight... brain damage only shows up when its already too late to save a fighter from mental and physical impairement but most people know the early signs of a boxer going down that road such as slurred speech and diminished reflexes and balance... James Toney can still 'fight' and probably will pass his next medical but you'd be hard pressed to understand what he's saying these days...jimmywils wrote:Hang on a sec champ. First of all, my original point (which seems like many posts ago) was that it only takes one punch to disable or god forbid, kill a boxer. Evander Holyfield has a licence to box, given to him after medical examinations, no matter how dubious those examinations are. Would Ali pass an examination? No. Would Micheal Watson? No.silkov wrote:What?.... so a fighter has to be as damaged as Watson or Mcclellen before he is stopped from fighting??.... I hope your not on any boxing boards or doing any promotions mate... Ali could still do some training /sparring in the 90s... would you have given him a license to fight then??....jimmywils wrote:My point being that if Holyfield is able to fight, then he isnt classed as 'disabled'. Yeh, ok , my choice of words (unaffected) may have been a bit naive but regardless of wether he is banned in some states or not, he still fights on and is still ranked in many organisations.
The same cant be said for the G-Man or Micheal Watson
Would any boxer pass one who couldnt defend himself? No
Thats why there is such a thing as a boxing board of control, to save the likes of me and you from deciding who fights and who doesnt.
And i dont care much for promoting anyway....thanks for the careers advice all the same pal.
Well said.rhino222 wrote:was sad to see the real hitman chatting on tv at the weekend, he voice seems in deterioration and therefore he is showing definate signs of cranial ring wear.
i hope thomas call it a day now while his faculties are still just in tact.
dont spoil your legacy tommy, dont fight again.
you have provided us with fantastic memories and we salute you.