Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 17:27
I reckon that's the way to beat Paul Williams too.
Sosa and Brussles, I agree with. Mitchel was okay in a role to test the waters at 147 - pretty much on a par with the unproven Collazo in that respect.Carbo wrote:That's one thing that people forget. Some criticise Hatton's opposition, but it's been a huge amount better than Mayweather's over their respective last six.
Judah was acceptable, but not much more given his huge inconsistencies. Oscar was a good choice, but he's well past his best, and the fight was more about the size difference than anything. What was astonishing was that is was the first time Mayweather had faced an opponent with a realistic chance of beating him for 5 years.
Sosa, Brussles, Mitchell -- all of them might have been acceptable as a one off, as would Gatti, as a crowd pleasing, money making affair. But in combination they're abysmal for a man of Floyd's exceptional ability.
With that I agree with, I was dissapointed that Mayweather hadn't fought Cotto, Hatton, Tsyu at 140... That was a cracking devision. However, I think it edges Hatton who now might even be considered #3 P4P.. so his comp must improve also.Carbo wrote:Perhaps I have been a little harsh, especially when considering Baldomir. I don't agree with your assessment of Mitchell -- who was sliding fast and was pretty cynical -- Gatti, who got the fight because of the fans and money he brought to the table, or Judah, who had been exposed as a front runner who would fold if things weren't going his way.
Anyway, I concede the point that I have judged harsly, but it's still not a good run for a supposed P4P number 1, especially when you consider Sosa and N'Dou before that. Mayweather effectively skipped 140.
Agree with all of that.Terry D wrote:I think the commentary was very poor. Williams won round eight for me whilst the US-team carried on talking about Margarito's momentum from the previous round and they seemed to effectively give Margarito every middle round based on this perception.
Williams won because he had tough rounds in the 7th and 11th then came back and won the next round.
I like Williams, I wish he was an orthodox fighter, he would be awesome to watch like that.
No no no no no! Gatti is just TOTALLY unaccepable! Their is no spin that you can put on it to say that he was a decent opponent. The absolute FACT is that Gatti has never beaten a world class opponent in his whole career. Ffs ESPECIALLY when Floyd fought him. DO NOT bring up a old and fat JJ Leija.stujones wrote:Sosa and Brussles, I agree with. Mitchel was okay in a role to test the waters at 147 - pretty much on a par with the unproven Collazo in that respect.Carbo wrote:That's one thing that people forget. Some criticise Hatton's opposition, but it's been a huge amount better than Mayweather's over their respective last six.
Judah was acceptable, but not much more given his huge inconsistencies. Oscar was a good choice, but he's well past his best, and the fight was more about the size difference than anything. What was astonishing was that is was the first time Mayweather had faced an opponent with a realistic chance of beating him for 5 years.
Sosa, Brussles, Mitchell -- all of them might have been acceptable as a one off, as would Gatti, as a crowd pleasing, money making affair. But in combination they're abysmal for a man of Floyd's exceptional ability.
Baldomir was the MAN at 147 - whether you like him or not.. to be in the "reckoning" to be the #1 at 147, he needed to beat him. Note, thats different than proving himself beyond doubt the #1... cause in that case he needed to beat Mosley, Margarito etc aswell. However, beating Mosley/Margarito etc alone would mean he would still be considered #2 untill he beat Baldomir.
Shane Mosley aside, Zab Judah was considered the most skill full of the Welters - a bit of a toss up between him, Mosley and Margarito as too who will give him the most problems. Judah vs Mayweather was considered a battle of the pound 4 pounders when it was originally signed (before Zab lost).
DLH was and is a legend and a fantastic Light Middleweight - some of his finest wins and performances have come at that weight. Irrespective of if you think DLH is a part time fighter and not in love with the sport anymore... his performance vs Mayweather showed he wasn't there to make up the numbers and he is still very much in the premiership of fighters and should be easily in the P4P top ten.
Gatti, whilst not near considered too Hatton/Tszyu in terms being the #1 in the devision was an exiting fighter IN GOOD FORM and beating some decent names. Lets not forget, he was early in his career in many P4P top 10 lists - and many people seemed to think he was back in that form. Aside from Tszyu/Hatton, who else could Mayweather have faced... Gatti was more established, fighting equally and impressive vs similar level opponents as Cotto... and was generally more established and better than Harris/Mitchell.
So all in all, whilst I don't think Mayweather has matched the Tszyu win and his opponents could have been better... I think they compare favourably to Hatton's last 6.
Judah more proven than Collazo, Gatti better than Maussa and Urango.. It could be argued that DLH was younger, fresher and overall more dangerous than Tszyu (cause he had a size advantage) - although not as universally recongised as the #1 in the devision granted. Brusseles and Olivera are on a par... Castillo was a great win, no doubt - but again was he caught at the right time and at the wrong weight.
Lets look at their last 6 opponents.
Hatton
Olivera - Tough, limited fighter over the hill.
Tszyu - Cannot fault #1 in the devision and in the P4P hunt.
Maussa - Champion - but simply was loaning a spot in the top 10... Realistically not Top 20... Not ever considered the main champion.
Collazo - Good, put unproven boxer at the new weight.
Urango - Read Maussa.
Castillo - Number 2 in the devision, but former Super Feather and the wrong side of 30 with many miles on the clock.
Mayweather
Brussles - Not much cop, frsher than Olivera but with less pedigree.
Gatti - Arguably #2 in the devision (see Castillo), in a good run of form, naturally bigger than Mayweather... two aspects that Castillo didn't have.
Mitchell - More proven than Collazo, but on the slide no doubt.
Judah - Considered one of the finest offensive fighters out there, could give (and did give) the sometimes considered light punching Mayweather problems. Whilst not the man at the devision at the time, was considered arguably the most skilled of the champions
Baldomir - Wouldn't argue that he could be seen as similar to Maussa and Urango in terms of ability... However, he was considered the main champion - a fundenmental difference.
DLH - Legend.
Overall, I give Mayweather the edge as a course of 6 fights.
Talk about spinning, Gatti was ona pretty impressive run of form. ever heard of Dorin? Some ranked him the top lightweight after Mayweather, the 1 Mayweather was accused of avoiding. Gatti ko'd him in the second with a bodyshot. Gatti ko'd Leija. He'd previously beat Ruelas, Patterson, Ward.Lefthookhappy19 wrote:Gatti really hasn't beat a world class opponent. I'd hardly call Ruelas and Patterson world class. Nothing but decent fighters. It's funny that you refuse to see the facts that are staring you right in the face. Journeymen that got dealt with by real world class fighters used to give Gatti HELL.
And Oscar isn't much cop these days and its easy to see. Its on paper as well actually.
And Margarito was the man until the weekend. I don't want to even think of the mess that Antonio would have left your boy Gatti in had they ever fought. The names in this division stayed the eff away from Antonio and thats why he doesn't have that big name win on his record.
The difference is Antonio doesn't have the pick of who he fights unlike the Mayweathers, Gatti's and Judah's of the world.
So you just stay in your own little world were Gatti is world class, Mayweather has fought good opponents and Oscar is still a great fighter.
Gatti is proven not to be world class at 147, so of course Margarito would have beaten him. However, he was a 140.Lefthookhappy19 wrote:Gatti really hasn't beat a world class opponent. I'd hardly call Ruelas and Patterson world class. Nothing but decent fighters. It's funny that you refuse to see the facts that are staring you right in the face. Journeymen that got dealt with by real world class fighters used to give Gatti HELL.
And Oscar isn't much cop these days and its easy to see. Its on paper as well actually.
And Margarito was the man until the weekend. I don't want to even think of the mess that Antonio would have left your boy Gatti in had they ever fought. The names in this division stayed the eff away from Antonio and thats why he doesn't have that big name win on his record.
The difference is Antonio doesn't have the pick of who he fights unlike the Mayweathers, Gatti's and Judah's of the world.
So you just stay in your own little world were Gatti is world class, Mayweather has fought good opponents and Oscar is still a great fighter.
Hold on there, Margarito's workrate - for whatever reason was pretty dire vs Williams.... He was completely outworked.Lefthookhappy19 wrote:Dorin was a fat lightweight. Who had Dorin beat btw? His claim to fame was drawing with Paul Spadafora.
My point is this. Everyone is telling us how great Mayweather is, how he will go down in the hall of fame, he's took on all comers....ect. Its total bullshit! We have to listen to how great this guy is when he has hardly ever even fought anyone. When I bring up Margarito, a guy who actually poses a great threat to him stylewise he just gets dismissed. The last guy with a high workrate and decent power that Floyd fought gave him hell and imo beat him. It seems to go over peoples heads that a giant welterweight with a big punch, granite chin and non stop workrate will beat him.
Exactly, he's a mid tier champion - always has been. Spinks, Forrest would have outboxed him also.Kilburn wrote:Margarito has lost to Williams, Santos, and would lose to a Clottey in a rematch. I think it's time to look towards the more serious matches.
Mayweather v Cotto is the one I want to see.
Dorin didn't draw with Spadafora, he beat Spad silly and was robbed.Lefthookhappy19 wrote:Dorin was a fat lightweight. Who had Dorin beat btw? His claim to fame was drawing with Paul Spadafora.
My point is this. Everyone is telling us how great Mayweather is, how he will go down in the hall of fame, he's took on all comers....ect. Its total bullshit! We have to listen to how great this guy is when he has hardly ever even fought anyone. When I bring up Margarito, a guy who actually poses a great threat to him stylewise he just gets dismissed. The last guy with a high workrate and decent power that Floyd fought gave him hell and imo beat him. It seems to go over peoples heads that a giant welterweight with a big punch, granite chin and non stop workrate will beat him.
Williams isn't great - BUT who beats him at 147-154?Autobarn wrote:It's necessary to balance quality and quantity. I felt Margo was landing the punches that counted and felt 7-5 to him or 6-6 in rds would have been fair with his aggressiveness. Williams threw loads of shots but many were rubbish arm punches and a lot were blocked. Tony sunk in good rights to the body and stung PW with some excellent straight rights late on.
Williams isn't great. He's just big, southpaw and fit.