Sprott-Harrison 2 and Williams-Skelton 3 ordered

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 14 Sep 2007, 18:18

G0mez wrote:Read this thread on a few forums.... not one person gives a toss about any of them, apart from maybe Matt Skelton.

Seems the trend continues here.

Audley especially comes in for a real bashing.

The only one I give a toss about is a 16 1/2 stone Danny Williams. I think he wipes the floor with all of them in that shape. If not, then he loses.

m1kee50 · Post by **m1kee50** » 14 Sep 2007, 18:19

stujones wrote:
G0mez wrote:Read this thread on a few forums.... not one person gives a toss about any of them, apart from maybe Matt Skelton.

Seems the trend continues here.

Audley especially comes in for a real bashing.
The only one I give a toss about is a 16 1/2 stone Danny Williams. I think he wipes the floor with all of them in that shape. If not, then he loses.

Well said

lvlarc · Post by **lvlarc** » 14 Sep 2007, 18:54

Not sure about that, Gammer gave Danny all he could handle just below that weight didn't he. Audley may get KO'd again but I'd fancy Skelton to do another job on Williams. But really, who cares?

Mario · Post by **Mario** » 14 Sep 2007, 19:29

Audleys the only one with any real class and the only one im really interested in seeing. He should see off Sprott easily this time and then next year finally meet Skelton.

Although the bouts are due to happen in Feb, none of these guys are getting any younger so it would make a lot sense to set them up for November or December.

leforge · Post by **leforge** » 14 Sep 2007, 20:28

Haye would smash these guys ups easily at heavy! What a joke world title my arse!

Syntax Error · Post by **Syntax Error** » 15 Sep 2007, 02:00

I was hoping that this tedious merry-go-round of poor to average British heavyweights would have stopped by now.

They are killing UK heavyweight boxing!

Come in David Haye, we need you!!!!

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 15 Sep 2007, 19:02

lvlarc wrote:Not sure about that, Gammer gave Danny all he could handle just below that weight didn't he. Audley may get KO'd again but I'd fancy Skelton to do another job on Williams. But really, who cares?

Disagree, Danny was in complete control. Thought Danny toyed with him myself. I didn't remember his exact weight vs Gammer - but it was spot on - thats the weight I won't to see Danny in all his fights - no more than 16 1/2 stone.

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 16 Sep 2007, 09:36

I just hope Danny is in good shape still!.... always a worry really.
As for Audely, credit to him for facing Sprott again rather than going in for some 'warm ups' against people noones heard of.... ok Sprott looked shite against Skelton but its still quite an interesting match up imo... a loss for either man at this stage and they might as well just pack it in...

lvlarc · Post by **lvlarc** » 16 Sep 2007, 13:09

stujones wrote:
lvlarc wrote:Not sure about that, Gammer gave Danny all he could handle just below that weight didn't he. Audley may get KO'd again but I'd fancy Skelton to do another job on Williams. But really, who cares?
Disagree, Danny was in complete control. Thought Danny toyed with him myself. I didn't remember his exact weight vs Gammer - but it was spot on - thats the weight I won't to see Danny in all his fights - no more than 16 1/2 stone.

Agree that Danny needs to stay around that weight, doubt it will happen though. As for the Gammer fight, I remember having it 4 rounds a piece going into the 9th before Danny's power and experience took over. Still a tough and entertaining fight. If he's not retiring yet I'd like to see him fight Virchis for the EBU title and then hang em up.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 16 Sep 2007, 13:49

Danny looked like he toyed with Gammer really.

Sky couldn't score that fight for crap, they had It a close fight.

lvlarc · Post by **lvlarc** » 16 Sep 2007, 14:04

But your opinion doesn't count on this matter Max because your English, remember?

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 16 Sep 2007, 20:15

I did a round by round of it is I remember, sure it wasn't wide on the my card... but I do think Danny was in control even if losing some of the rounds. A bit like his performance vs Sprott in the 3rd fight. His mental flaws risked him losing again, but I think he was undoubtedly in control and the better man.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 16 Sep 2007, 20:19

silkov wrote:I just hope Danny is in good shape still!.... always a worry really.
As for Audely, credit to him for facing Sprott again rather than going in for some 'warm ups' against people noones heard of.... ok Sprott looked shite against Skelton but its still quite an interesting match up imo... a loss for either man at this stage and they might as well just pack it in...

Lets not give him credit untill the fight is made. They have just been order by the BBBoC. Nobody has said they are definately one. Audley (like Catley has just done for the Super Middle title) could not accept this fight. I don't think Audley has particularly forced the issue, all that has really happend so far is a panel has declared Audley and Sprott should meet.

Although I suspect he will face the Reading fighter, he did have Sprott in a Spot of bother in the opener. It was a one in a million punch that Sprott landed, don't know if he will do it again.

Tunney · Post by **Tunney** » 16 Sep 2007, 23:09

Why do they keep on fighting each other? They should be fighting European heavyweights:

Skelton vs. Virchis
Harrison vs. Dimitrenko
Sprott vs. Platov
Williams vs. Bidenko

These would be more meaningful and interesting matchups.

Or perhaps American heavyweights:

Skelton vs. Ruiz (hugfest)
Harrison vs. Arreola
Sprott vs. Brewster
Williams vs. Rahman

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 18 Sep 2007, 06:00

I think people will only go to see these fights if there is a good top of the bill - We have yet to see Skelton/Harrison though.

Big Pussy · Post by **Big Pussy** » 18 Sep 2007, 06:56

The BBB of C can order as many matches as possible but it's television who pays. If Setanta shell out for these joke matches they deserve all the 200 viewers they get!

In a perfect world, I would like to see

Skelton fight for the European title- nothing less
Sprott to ply his trade on foreign soil and try to pick up some good wins as an opponent like he did before.
Harrison to get done by Vegas journeymen...far, far away from these shores and with no television.
Williams to retire. A result against Gammer doesn't prove anything and he's mugged people off with his weight and lack of training in the last few years.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 18 Sep 2007, 07:43

audley harrison is to fight sheffields paul king on the clinton woods bill

Syntax Error · Post by **Syntax Error** » 18 Sep 2007, 07:51

Big Pussy wrote:The BBB of C can order as many matches as possible but it's television who pays. If Setanta shell out for these joke matches they deserve all the 200 viewers they get!

In a perfect world, I would like to see

Skelton fight for the European title- nothing less
Sprott to ply his trade on foreign soil and try to pick up some good wins as an opponent like he did before.
Harrison to get done by Vegas journeymen...far, far away from these shores and with no television.
Williams to retire. A result against Gammer doesn't prove anything and he's mugged people off with his weight and lack of training in the last few years.

100% agree.

The UK HW scene is totally depressing, with the exception of David Haye.

I'm hoping Haye can cement his legacy at cruiserweight, then step up & KO all these average (Skelton & Williams) & poor (Harrison, Sprott & Gammer) heavyweights in Britain, then we will all know where we stand in this country.

I just do not see the logic behind an endless succession of poor fights between this useless lot!

oliverfennell · Post by **oliverfennell** » 18 Sep 2007, 07:57

Chambers2 wrote:audley harrison is to fight sheffields paul king on the clinton woods bill

This had better be sarcasm!

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 18 Sep 2007, 09:41

oliverfennell wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:audley harrison is to fight sheffields paul king on the clinton woods bill
This had better be sarcasm!

A bloke on the Doghouse reckons hes a mate of Paul Kings and he told him, so it's not gospel. I'm not opposed to a 'get your eye in' fight for the BIG man after the lay-off

oliverfennell · Post by **oliverfennell** » 18 Sep 2007, 11:07

People would have criticised Audley for fighting King on his DEBUT, never mind now!

Sure, I'm all for a "rehab" fight too, but he can do better than this.

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 18 Sep 2007, 18:22

I must admit, I prefer WayneKing to Paul King

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 18 Sep 2007, 19:32

Decline.

This is one merry-go-round that I want to get off.

No interest in these match ups what so ever.

Coco · Post by **Coco** » 18 Sep 2007, 21:04

WildWaylon wrote:I must admit, I prefer WayneKing to Paul King

Wayne is a good fighter, gotta great shot!

nickd · Post by **nickd** » 19 Sep 2007, 06:03

If Haye beats Mormeck I doubt we'll see him in with any of the domestic heavies and rightly so. Why would a WBC champion then go up in weight and back to domestic level? I guess there's a chance he will do that if he loses to Mormeck.