BoxRec

stujones wrote:What I don't get is the date - if these were taken in May, then why is it only now they are published. Straight after the Mayweather fight surely would have been the better time to sell them.

Also, why the wig - that is not the strippers hair - its the wrong colour. So does Oscar carry a wig and a pair of boxing gloves with him all the time?

Er, because the affair ended maybe?

I' ve seen my fair share of 'fake pic fury' in the sunday sport and I'm sure those photos are legit.

Unfortunately I also believe they're legit. Aside from the technical issues of photoshop, Oscar's lawyers have now released a carefully worded statement that while acting as a denial refrains from the type of language you'd expect if they were absolutely convinced they were fakes. The likes of the News of the World have published today, and you can rest assured that given the type of legal guns the likes of Oscar can bring to bear this would have been thoroughly checked out by News International's lawyers first.
As a related aside, when I was working in Dubai there was an American guy there who used to act as a bodyguard from Oscar, and it's safe to say that the Golden Boy's image is nowhere near as squeaky clean as he likes to present!

Maybe DLH was drunk and he didn't remember what he was doing.

If thats photoshopped then It's good as I don't see nothing fixed.

Some of the funniest photos I've seen in a long while. Wonder what Oscar's misses, Millie, has seen them?

If she has, Oscar could be in the doghouse right now!

The boxing stance looks spot on, to tell you the truth; but there's something about that fishnet whatever-it-is that looks photshopped.

Don't know, they're awful, and I never want to see them again. But, hey, if it's good enough for J. Edgar Hoover, it's good enough for Oscar.

They look a bit too glossy and stagy and professional to be authentic, IMO.

I've never seen a photoshopped picture without a tell-tale join. At one time people were prepared to pay bucketloads for a photoshopped picture of Britney with her tits out but it had to pass the "no visible join" rule. Needless to say the money was safe.

I don't think we'll see any legal action from DLH on this one

He might have to do a Hugh Grant and sit on Parky telling us what silly things you can do when you can do anything.

I knew a hooker in Peckham once who told me about the guys who paid her a lot of money to play sub/dom games with them. It's all about power, control, fantasy, money and secrecy.

Luckily, my life is about 5p a litre off diesel vouchers, direct debits and B+Q value paint brushes. If I had a few million I might be found crawling through the local travel lodge with a blood bubble popping from my nose being whipped by a drunk hooker who looks like fatima whitbread. I live in hope.

I doubt its him, Oscar is a pro boxer and the photos of the guys hands look to tood to be a fighters.

Well at first I thought NO WAY....but that press release seems more than a little defensive, so I'm inclined to think they're probably legit. Plus his haircut looks consistant in the pics, apart from wig shots - and going by his face they all look recent shots, and likely taken at the same time.

He must have been smashed on tequila beyond belief to allow pics like that to be taken, if they're real.

Can you imagine the grin on Hopkins face next time they get together for a business meeting?

Feel really sorry for Oscar having to explain THAT one away to his Mrs..."But darlin', there's a perfectly logical explanation I promise...!!"

If they were 100% fakes i am sure Oscar and his team would be flying out all guns blazing in a suing-everybody-in-sight law suit. But his feeble denial just says to me DLH is a naughty boy.

Fancy allowing these types of pics taken, a bit sloppy for such a pro if you ask me.

The dirty little fecker

Oscar accuser apologizes!
By Lisa Scott
The woman who claimed to have taken racy photos of Oscar de la Hoya is now pulling her punches and changing her story. According to The NY Daily News, the accuser has told that paper's gossip duo, Rush & Malloy, "I cannot personally verify the authenticity of the images," because pictures she still claims she took "were taken from my personal camera and were out of my control." She also states, "I was pressured into going public with the photos by certain individuals who had improper motives and acted solely for their own financial gain." While De La Hoya's powerhouse attorney, Bert Fields, has threatened to use "all legal remedies" to defend his client's good name, the accuser, a 22-year-old Russian immigrant stripper, has insisted her decision to recant some of her statements is hers and that she has "not been approached or paid by anyone or received any other form of compensation to do this." Last week, the woman appeared on Entertainment Tonight claiming she had taken saucy shots of de la Hoya in various poses wearing a fishnet body suit and stiletto heels. The photos, which looked to have been Photoshopped, caused a scandal and eventually found their way to the internet. The woman taped an interview on E.T. that is due to air this evening, in which she denies that pictures had been altered. However, she now says that she lied to them in their interview. "I only agreed to do a television interview, after I received numerous threats from people who were in control of the images," the former Scores stripper finally added, "I apologize to Mr. De La Hoya for any embarrassment I caused him and his family."

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Oscar isn't a particularly muscular or thick set guy though is he?

If you look at the pose in James's picture, above, and the pose Oscar pulls in the picture, it's identical. Either somebody has done a great job of photoshipping the fishnets, the panties and the wig, or somebody's done a great job of finding an Oscar body-double and then photoshopping the wig, or they're real.

stujones wrote:Oscar accuser apologizes!
By Lisa Scott
The woman who claimed to have taken racy photos of Oscar de la Hoya is now pulling her punches and changing her story. According to The NY Daily News, the accuser has told that paper's gossip duo, Rush & Malloy, "I cannot personally verify the authenticity of the images," because pictures she still claims she took "were taken from my personal camera and were out of my control." She also states, "I was pressured into going public with the photos by certain individuals who had improper motives and acted solely for their own financial gain." While De La Hoya's powerhouse attorney, Bert Fields, has threatened to use "all legal remedies" to defend his client's good name, the accuser, a 22-year-old Russian immigrant stripper, has insisted her decision to recant some of her statements is hers and that she has "not been approached or paid by anyone or received any other form of compensation to do this." Last week, the woman appeared on Entertainment Tonight claiming she had taken saucy shots of de la Hoya in various poses wearing a fishnet body suit and stiletto heels. The photos, which looked to have been Photoshopped, caused a scandal and eventually found their way to the internet. The woman taped an interview on E.T. that is due to air this evening, in which she denies that pictures had been altered. However, she now says that she lied to them in their interview. "I only agreed to do a television interview, after I received numerous threats from people who were in control of the images," the former Scores stripper finally added, "I apologize to Mr. De La Hoya for any embarrassment I caused him and his family."

What does that mean? Sounds like a retraction......but odd. Will the stripper's body be found at the bottom of the river?

E wrote:

stujones wrote:Oscar accuser apologizes!
By Lisa Scott
The woman who claimed to have taken racy photos of Oscar de la Hoya is now pulling her punches and changing her story. According to The NY Daily News, the accuser has told that paper's gossip duo, Rush & Malloy, "I cannot personally verify the authenticity of the images," because pictures she still claims she took "were taken from my personal camera and were out of my control." She also states, "I was pressured into going public with the photos by certain individuals who had improper motives and acted solely for their own financial gain." While De La Hoya's powerhouse attorney, Bert Fields, has threatened to use "all legal remedies" to defend his client's good name, the accuser, a 22-year-old Russian immigrant stripper, has insisted her decision to recant some of her statements is hers and that she has "not been approached or paid by anyone or received any other form of compensation to do this." Last week, the woman appeared on Entertainment Tonight claiming she had taken saucy shots of de la Hoya in various poses wearing a fishnet body suit and stiletto heels. The photos, which looked to have been Photoshopped, caused a scandal and eventually found their way to the internet. The woman taped an interview on E.T. that is due to air this evening, in which she denies that pictures had been altered. However, she now says that she lied to them in their interview. "I only agreed to do a television interview, after I received numerous threats from people who were in control of the images," the former Scores stripper finally added, "I apologize to Mr. De La Hoya for any embarrassment I caused him and his family."

What does that mean? Sounds like a retraction......but odd. Will the stripper's body be found at the bottom of the river?

Hmm. I think it's rather obvious what's happened here. A representative of Oscar's has paid her a visit with a briefcase stuffed with cash in order to get her to change her story.

I don't believe those pictures are fake, but of course, it's not easy to prove either way. Those pictures looked to me to be of someone who at the least was a very close body double of Oscar, there are so many similarities.

My guess, she's got what she wanted, and is now retracting her story.

even if them pics were real, why the hell would anyone want to believe they were.
For goodness's sake that thought is much more palatable than the thought of DLH, who loads of us have admired in the boxing ring so many times, was really prancing around like that - and worse got photographed !! Ouch !!!
But then again the guy's so hard - does he really give a toss (apart from Mrs DLH of course) what Joe public thinks of him.

One little thing though for those who are inclined to think they're real - if the idea was just to make DLH look like a big kinky get - why the first innocent snaps of him in normal fella's clothes - whole thing has a look of "one thing led to another.........". Unless they want you to think that and it makes the sauce look more genuine.
I prefer to think the whole thing's a fake personally - and even if they ain't - doesn't make the guy any less a legend in my eyes.

They have to be fake, there is no way that picture with the Boxing Gloves stance is real Did he bring the Boxing Gloves in his hand bag for the photo shoot

The Hawk wrote:They have to be fake, there is no way that picture with the Boxing Gloves stance is real Did he bring the Boxing Gloves in his hand bag for the photo shoot

It's hardly beyond the realms of possibility is it.

Personally, I have no problem if Oscar is a kinky sod, the world is full of perverts, why should he be any different. Why would anyone even be surprised by it, christ, I've got up to more depraved scenes than that myself, though it didn't involve dressing up.

Whatever floats his boat, I just find the whole thing quite amusing.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

The Hawk wrote:They have to be fake, there is no way that picture with the Boxing Gloves stance is real Did he bring the Boxing Gloves in his hand bag for the photo shoot

It's hardly beyond the realms of possibility is it.

Personally, I have no problem if Oscar is a kinky sod, the world is full of perverts, why should he be any different. Why would anyone even be surprised by it, christ, I've got up to more depraved scenes than that myself, though it didn't involve dressing up.

Whatever floats his boat, I just find the whole thing quite amusing.

Thats true, if he was to dress like that I guess the hand bag would not be out of the question for the Boxing Gloves

I think they look very funny, but I just don't see them as being real. When looking at them, to my eye they don't look 100% true, they look very well done fakes from what I can see in certain pictures. I think the Boxing Glove stance is one of the most fake looking ones of the heap.

I'm not saying that its impossible that Oscar is into these kinks, he could well be for all I know but I just see those pictures as very well done fakes, its not impossible to make them like that.

Wonders never cease. Just come back from holiday to read this thread!

Can't tell if they are the goods or not, there are a lot of people out there who really hate DLH though so somebody might have gone to exceptional lenghts to fake them?

In or out of the ring, Oscar has never turned me on.

I don't know if this has already been mentioned, but I've just got round to watching the episode of Contender III where DLH and SRL have a bet over who will win when their respective fighters clash (Mora, Forbes, ouma and Bojado). SRL suggests that the loser should have to perform the ring girls duties for a round, well you oughta seen DLH's eyes light up, he nearly snatched Sugar Rays hand off ......and there my honour is conclusive proof that the pictures of Oscar De La Hoya in the fishnet stockings are in fact real. Case closed!!


I've not been a massive fan of the Contender series, but this series looks alot better from the little I've seen, they seem to have got rid of alot of the slow-mo's and crowd shots from the fight scenes, but tbh I don't think we should be too critical of the production as its targetting new fans (rather than us anoraks) to the sport in a more commercial and fan-friendly way, in the same way that Twenty20 is for cricket.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

The Hawk wrote:They have to be fake, there is no way that picture with the Boxing Gloves stance is real Did he bring the Boxing Gloves in his hand bag for the photo shoot

Why would anyone even be surprised by it, christ, I've got up to more depraved scenes than that myself, though it didn't involve dressing up.

nice to see you are about to "come clean" about the viagra and the donkey James :P

Your memory fails you, you were wearing a pantomime cow suit, not a donkey one....

bennie wrote:In or out of the ring, Oscar has never turned me on.

No pun intended? ;)