Posted: 06 Oct 2007, 17:43
Apparently we ARE getting to see the Pryce fight. No looking at the results page now!
me too lol. Is he related to that other fighter Concepcion?Deserter wrote:Too late, already had a look :(
Ill say one thing --- Mugabis opponents in those fights have more losses than KhansKO Artist wrote:Khan, an olympic silver, at 135, 14-0. They are billing him as a world champ.
Compare his record to another 14-0 olympian at 147 and see the difference in the standard of boxing
1983-05-15 155 Roosevelt Green 152 19-2-0
Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States W TKO 1 0
1982-10-23 164 Doug Demmings 31-10-1
Berlin, Germany W TKO 5 0
1982-09-15 155½ Steve Williams 155½ 6-6-0
Madison Square Garden, New York City, New York, United States W TKO 6 10
1982-05-02 153¾ Curtis Ramsey 152¼ 21-10-5
Playboy Hotel & Casino, Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States W KO 1 0
1982-03-26 Curtis Taylor 12-10-0
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany W KO 2 0
1981-12-26 157¾ Sammy Floyd 157¾ 6-18-1
Gelsenkirchen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany W KO 2 0
1981-11-16 Darwin Brewster 6-0-1
Mayfair, London, United Kingdom W KO 6 0
1981-10-31 John Mwansa 1-0-0
Lusaka, Zambia W KO 1 0
1981-09-25 154½ Ronnie Ford 155½ 3-4-1
Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany W KO 1 0
1981-05-30 157 Pedro Guerrero 0-5-0
Showboat Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States W TKO 2 0
1981-05-11 Dennis Pryce 17-13-3
Mayfair, London, United Kingdom W KO 1 0
1981-04-10 154¾ Mauricio Da Cruz 156¾ 2-26-2
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany W TKO 4 0
1981-02-13 154 Giampaolo Piras 4-61-8
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany W TKO 2 0
1980-12-05 149½ Oemer Karadenis 149½ 1-3-3
Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany W TKO 1 0
Come on Mikee mate, have you seen who they fought? Have you seen the fights?MIKEE wrote:Ill say one thing --- Mugabis opponents in those fights have more losses than KhansKO Artist wrote:Khan, an olympic silver, at 135, 14-0. They are billing him as a world champ.
Compare his record to another 14-0 olympian at 147 and see the difference in the standard of boxing
1983-05-15 155 Roosevelt Green 152 19-2-0
Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States W TKO 1 0
1982-10-23 164 Doug Demmings 31-10-1
Berlin, Germany W TKO 5 0
1982-09-15 155½ Steve Williams 155½ 6-6-0
Madison Square Garden, New York City, New York, United States W TKO 6 10
1982-05-02 153¾ Curtis Ramsey 152¼ 21-10-5
Playboy Hotel & Casino, Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States W KO 1 0
1982-03-26 Curtis Taylor 12-10-0
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany W KO 2 0
1981-12-26 157¾ Sammy Floyd 157¾ 6-18-1
Gelsenkirchen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany W KO 2 0
1981-11-16 Darwin Brewster 6-0-1
Mayfair, London, United Kingdom W KO 6 0
1981-10-31 John Mwansa 1-0-0
Lusaka, Zambia W KO 1 0
1981-09-25 154½ Ronnie Ford 155½ 3-4-1
Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany W KO 1 0
1981-05-30 157 Pedro Guerrero 0-5-0
Showboat Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States W TKO 2 0
1981-05-11 Dennis Pryce 17-13-3
Mayfair, London, United Kingdom W KO 1 0
1981-04-10 154¾ Mauricio Da Cruz 156¾ 2-26-2
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany W TKO 4 0
1981-02-13 154 Giampaolo Piras 4-61-8
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany W TKO 2 0
1980-12-05 149½ Oemer Karadenis 149½ 1-3-3
Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany W TKO 1 0
If you havent seen the fights to compare them, pure numbers dont really say much at alljamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah, I thought that too. Hardly that impressive, aside from the manner of their destruction.
James, I think you are as unimpresed with Mugabi, as I am impresed with him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah, I thought that too. Hardly that impressive, aside from the manner of their destruction.
jamesmcdonnell wrote:What's with the flesh coloured microphone? I thought he had a fekking massive wart on his face when it first came on, he looks like bloody grotbags.
an honorable victory might be better lolDioufy wrote:Would an honorable defeat to Michael Katsidis or Yuri Ramonev stand Khan in good stead for his career.
He won't beat those fighters just yet though, and it beat pissing on fighters like Lawton, Earl and Limond.MIKEE wrote:an honorable victory might be better lolDioufy wrote:Would an honorable defeat to Michael Katsidis or Yuri Ramonev stand Khan in good stead for his career.
I didnt realise we were talking about RIGHT NOW.... IMO beating Earl would be on a par with getting spanked by Katsidis.Dioufy wrote:He won't beat those fighters just yet though, and it beat pissing on fighters like Lawton, Earl and Limond.MIKEE wrote:an honorable victory might be better lolDioufy wrote:Would an honorable defeat to Michael Katsidis or Yuri Ramonev stand Khan in good stead for his career.
I think you're spot on with all of this Terry, particularly with regards to the 5-6 shot flurries, as it's the one time where he does still appear to square up with his chin hanging out. Against someone who can time him coming in he could easily get clocked... bad habit from the amateurs that they need to erase.Terry D wrote:He looked good tonight. Surprised Lawton ditched the jab, or was unable to use it, as he landed it a few times when he let it go. It was his best defence and he was a sitting target without it.
I think Khan will be better if he ditches 5-6 shot flurries, as he did in this fight. Why not throw 1-2-3 then take a step to the side and throw another trio. Same amount of shots but he gets to switch the angles and avoid a straight shot coming his way.
Oliver has him doing this and it seems his style is settling down a little bit in every few fights or so.
Flurrying against Earl could allow Earl to swing one in so I hope he picks his shots from now on. James Toney used hand speed and steps between combos well in his best bouts.
Well, not quite idolise, but he was a terrific fighter, and great fun to watch.KO Artist wrote:James, I think you are as unimpresed with Mugabi, as I am impresed with him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah, I thought that too. Hardly that impressive, aside from the manner of their destruction.
I recall that you and I are about the same age, you should idolise the beast
Now JUST now, but within his next three fights. I don't think Kasidis would spank Khan but I don't think Khan would be Katsidis.MIKEE wrote:I didnt realise we were talking about RIGHT NOW.... IMO beating Earl would be on a par with getting spanked by Katsidis.Dioufy wrote:He won't beat those fighters just yet though, and it beat pissing on fighters like Lawton, Earl and Limond.MIKEE wrote: an honorable victory might be better lol
What a great counter that was by Pryce! fantastic shot
If Katsidis can stop Earl, he can stop Khan, if Limond put Khan on Judah-legs, then Katsidis can rock him for sureDioufy wrote:Now JUST now, but within his next three fights. I don't think Kasidis would spank Khan but I don't think Khan would be Katsidis.MIKEE wrote:I didnt realise we were talking about RIGHT NOW.... IMO beating Earl would be on a par with getting spanked by Katsidis.Dioufy wrote: He won't beat those fighters just yet though, and it beat pissing on fighters like Lawton, Earl and Limond.
What a great counter that was by Pryce! fantastic shot
You're right, Khan's tendency to throw quick flurries coming forward carries his momentum right into his opponents range and opens him up for short counters. Against an opponent who can dig, Khan will have to come through a some sticky moments.Terry D wrote:He looked good tonight. Surprised Lawton ditched the jab, or was unable to use it, as he landed it a few times when he let it go. It was his best defence and he was a sitting target without it.
I think Khan will be better if he ditches 5-6 shot flurries, as he did in this fight. Why not throw 1-2-3 then take a step to the side and throw another trio. Same amount of shots but he gets to switch the angles and avoid a straight shot coming his way.
Oliver has him doing this and it seems his style is settling down a little bit in every few fights or so.
Flurrying against Earl could allow Earl to swing one in so I hope he picks his shots from now on. James Toney used hand speed and steps between combos well in his best bouts.
Usually, I would bow to your superior knowledge, but as I have seen every single pro and olympic fight of mugabi, I will beg to differ here.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Well, not quite idolise, but he was a terrific fighter, and great fun to watch.KO Artist wrote:James, I think you are as unimpresed with Mugabi, as I am impresed with him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah, I thought that too. Hardly that impressive, aside from the manner of their destruction.
I recall that you and I are about the same age, you should idolise the beast
My point is that there's nothing spectacular about that list of opponents. Mugabi was rightly called the beast and was as murderous a puncher as I've ever seen, but he wasn't fighting anyone special in his first 14 fights.