Ezzard wrote:One thing about Ali's taunts was that he usually kept them for black fighters. Ali knew that pulling the 'what's my name' trick on white boxers would not be recieved too well.
That's untrue, Ali did taunt white fighters. That said, it is true that Ali would get angrier when black fighters would call him "Cassius Clay". Bonavena called him "Cassius" but Ali didn't get quite as angry. It seems to me, going by Ali's comments, specifically to Terrell, that he seemed to expect black people to respect his name, while he didn't seem to be too surprised when it was a white opponent calling him "Cassius." But that's just my interpretation of it.
dempseyfire wrote:Yes, the gorilla comment was very racial. Ali made Frazier into the image of the dumb black Uncle Tom, who said 'yessir' to the white man, living off his strength but no brains. Frazier didn't understand why the son of a sharecropper who rose from the South into the HW championship wouldn't be elevated in the black community above a middle-class, half-white loudmouth from Louisville.
I would have prefered it if you had addressed my reply, rather than ignoring it, but that's fine. Either way, I disagree. "Uncle Tom" is a racial slur, but I think you are jumping to conclusions about Ali's intentions in calling Frazier a "gorilla." Ali made up names for many of his opponents (rabbit, bear, acorn, washer woman) and I don't know that "gorilla" was meant by Ali to be a slur related to race. It certainly was an insult to Frazier's intelligence, I wouldn't disagree there.
dempseyfire wrote:I don't believe this is some pathetic grab at "attention" (the comments he made were always to low-level boxing writers and in informal conversation)
That's obviously not true. Champions Forever, Ali's biography, the HBO documentary on Ali-Frazier I, ESPN's biography on Frazier, and now this article by ESPN. Frazier has hardly been low key about it. Not to say he should be, but after all this time I do wonder if Joe likes the attention it brings him.
Ezzard wrote:Well, it's one that rumbles on... I think 60-70% is nto really representative. Ali would never have had an easy time with Frazier.
Ali was better than 60-70% against Frazier in the first fight, but Frazier was also better than 60-70% in the rematches, too. I've said this in the past, but it works both ways; If Ali doesn't have any excuses for the first fight, Frazier has no excuses for the rematches either. I don't see the logic in saying that Frazier beats Ali at their best. It seems to me that the Ali-Frazier rematches have been downplayed in the past few years, along with the significance of Ali's ring rust in the first fight. People so much like the idea of Frazier making Ali pay in the first fight for his comments, and knocking him down in the process, that they don't want to have to spoil it by recognizing that Frazier lost the trilogy. The rematches are inconvenient to the story, people want the story to end with Frazier shutting Ali up.
As to Robinson's idea that Ali's status is blown up and exagerrated by his fans and popularity... one could say that of any famous fighter; Louis, Dempsey, Marciano, Holyfield, Leonard, Chavez, Duran. No?